Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

D700 - seems pretty solid


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 Lionfish43

Lionfish43

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 910 posts
  • Location:Dover, NH USA

Posted 30 June 2008 - 08:19 AM

D700
Larry Oberlander My Webpage
Nikon D200, Aquatica AD200

#2 Lionfish43

Lionfish43

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 910 posts
  • Location:Dover, NH USA

Posted 30 June 2008 - 03:53 PM

Some additional pictures
D700 pictures
Larry Oberlander My Webpage
Nikon D200, Aquatica AD200

#3 loftus

loftus

    Blue Whale

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4571 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Winter Park, Fl

Posted 30 June 2008 - 04:38 PM

Some additional pictures
D700 pictures

Looks real alright, but the pentaprism definitely looks larger, so that D300 housing option is not looking good.
Nikon D800, Nikon D7000, Nauticam, Inons, Subtronic Novas. Lens collection - 10-17, 15, 16, 16-35, 14-24, 24-70, 85, 18-200, 28-300, 70-200, 60 and 105, TC's. Macs with Aperture and Photoshop.

#4 mandarinfish

mandarinfish

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 282 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Oregon

Posted 30 June 2008 - 05:51 PM

Looks real alright, but the pentaprism definitely looks larger, so that D300 housing option is not looking good.


It's real; there was an official announcement from Nikon France. Specs are here:
http://www.focus-num...e-technique.pdf

And the body is definitely larger than the D300, so I know it won't fit in my housing!

Linda

#5 james

james

    The Engineer

  • Super Mod
  • 9969 posts
  • Location:Houston TX

Posted 30 June 2008 - 06:01 PM

Yes! Nikon finally has a 5D running-mate :-)

Looks solid to me too.

Cheers
James
Canon 1DsMkIII - Seacam Housing
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org

#6 davephdv

davephdv

    Doc Eyeballs

  • Senior Moderator
  • 2297 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Goleta CA

Posted 30 June 2008 - 07:14 PM

The specs suggest it is a few mm taller than the D300.

I'm relieved. My D300 fits in the Suba housing like isotoner gloves. I won't have to buy this camera and it would cost too much to buy another housing. Also I look for a big drop in the D300 price. Means a second body ought to be affordable. Maybe even a used one from some fool that just has to trade up.
Dave Burroughs, Nikon D300, D2X, Subal housing, DS160 strobes

Life is a beach and then you dive.

My Website


#7 Lionfish43

Lionfish43

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 910 posts
  • Location:Dover, NH USA

Posted 30 June 2008 - 08:25 PM

There's a hands on preview now up omn DPReview. It has a pretty good D300/D700/D3 side by side comparison HERE. The D700 is noticeably taller. The good part is that the viewfinder looks to be about the same size as the D3.
Larry Oberlander My Webpage
Nikon D200, Aquatica AD200

#8 BottomTime

BottomTime

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 137 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 30 June 2008 - 09:09 PM

The specs suggest it is a few mm taller than the D300.

I'm relieved. My D300 fits in the Suba housing like isotoner gloves. I won't have to buy this camera and it would cost too much to buy another housing. Also I look for a big drop in the D300 price. Means a second body ought to be affordable. Maybe even a used one from some fool that just has to trade up.


Yup... that does me in as well. If I thought the camera would fit, it would have given me something to toil over. But it looks like the decision has been made for me. Retooling for 2 stops of extra speed isn't something I'm interested in. Now I can go spend all that money I just saved on some new strobes!

Mike

 

"Some of the world's greatest feats were accomplished by people not smart enough to know they were impossible"

 


#9 Alex_Mustard

Alex_Mustard

    The Doctor

  • Super Mod
  • 8388 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough

Posted 01 July 2008 - 12:06 AM

I guess it depends on the housing. Surely there must be room for this viewfinder in some housings, especially with a thinner hotshoe adaptor.

Moreover, would it not be possible to make a D700 housing that would take the D300, too?

Alex

Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Nikon D7100 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (Nauticam housing).


#10 Lionfish43

Lionfish43

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 910 posts
  • Location:Dover, NH USA

Posted 01 July 2008 - 05:04 AM

I guess it depends on the housing. Surely there must be room for this viewfinder in some housings, especially with a thinner hotshoe adaptor.

Moreover, would it not be possible to make a D700 housing that would take the D300, too?

Alex

Good point Alex. I would think it's possible since the rest of the body seems essentially the same. That would still mean purchasing a new housing...kind of tough to swallow for someone who just invested in a D300 housing.
Larry Oberlander My Webpage
Nikon D200, Aquatica AD200

#11 Kelpfish

Kelpfish

    Giant Squid

  • Industry
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1602 posts
  • Location:California

Posted 01 July 2008 - 05:17 AM

I read somewhere on a stock photo forum I am involved in that you can change a menu setting that lets you use FX or DX lenses. If this is true, that would be awesome. I'd hate to have to carry two lens styles...unless I am rich like Gates.

Joe
Joe Belanger
Author, Catalina Island - All you Need to Know
www.californiaunderwater.com
www.visitingcatalina.com

#12 rachid

rachid

    Lionfish

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 01 July 2008 - 05:58 AM

I read somewhere on a stock photo forum I am involved in that you can change a menu setting that lets you use FX or DX lenses. If this is true, that would be awesome. I'd hate to have to carry two lens styles...unless I am rich like Gates.

Joe

Yes it is possible to use DX lenses. But then you have only 5.1 MP :)
Nikon D70s Sea&Sea DX-D70 | Sigma 10-20mm, 50mm, Nikon 18-200mm VR | Nikonos SB-105, Fantasea SB-800 | Fuji F810
Flickr gallery

#13 ATJ

ATJ

    Tiger Shark

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 638 posts
  • Location:Blue Mountains, NSW, Australia
  • Interests:Diving, Photograph, Marine Biology

Posted 01 July 2008 - 08:22 AM

I guess it depends on the housing. Surely there must be room for this viewfinder in some housings, especially with a thinner hotshoe adaptor.

My Ikelite D300 housing won't have room - not that I wanted a D700 myself (I could buy a bunch of lenses for the same cost :) ).

#14 craig

craig

    Full Moon Rising

  • Super Mod
  • 2826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin, TX

Posted 01 July 2008 - 08:32 AM

I now wish Nikon would introduce the D700x at 24MP as opposed to the D3x. Both cameras would be fine. :-)
I love it when a plan comes together.
- Col. John "Hannibal" Smith

------
Nikon, Seatool, Nexus, Inon
My Galleries

#15 Alex_Mustard

Alex_Mustard

    The Doctor

  • Super Mod
  • 8388 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough

Posted 01 July 2008 - 10:02 AM

So the race is on for housings. But which will we see first? D700 housing available to buy or D3X available to fit in the D3 housing? Not that they are really competing products!

Alex

Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Nikon D7100 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (Nauticam housing).


#16 scorpio_fish

scorpio_fish

    Orca

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas, TX

Posted 01 July 2008 - 01:22 PM

I now wish Nikon would introduce the D700x at 24MP as opposed to the D3x. Both cameras would be fine. :-)



That's not how it works. First the D3X so that all who really want 24mp will pony up the big bucks. Once sales of the new D3x level off, then the 24mp D300 will arrive.

That's how some of us D100 owners ended up with a D2X, when all we really wanted was a D200.
"Me, fail English?.........Unpossible!"

#17 Claude

Claude

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

Posted 01 July 2008 - 01:39 PM

I guess it depends on the housing. Surely there must be room for this viewfinder in some housings, especially with a thinner hotshoe adaptor.

I think there's place enough in the sea & sea housing... but based on DPReview side by side comparison, not really sure about the housing viewfinder placement!

Moreover, would it not be possible to make a D700 housing that would take the D300, too?

with a mobile viewfinder? :)
www.Aquatilia.com
Nikon D300 - Sea & Sea housing

#18 james

james

    The Engineer

  • Super Mod
  • 9969 posts
  • Location:Houston TX

Posted 01 July 2008 - 02:04 PM

Right - the main thing is the measurement between the lens center-line and the viewfinder centerline. If that measurement is different, then it's difficult to adapt the housing.

CheerS
James
Canon 1DsMkIII - Seacam Housing
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org

#19 loftus

loftus

    Blue Whale

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4571 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Winter Park, Fl

Posted 01 July 2008 - 04:09 PM

Well I ordered one! Expected arrival July 25th. For me it's a cheaper, smaller D3 which I've been lusting after for topside, available light etc. Not sure yet it will be my underwater choice.
Nikon D800, Nikon D7000, Nauticam, Inons, Subtronic Novas. Lens collection - 10-17, 15, 16, 16-35, 14-24, 24-70, 85, 18-200, 28-300, 70-200, 60 and 105, TC's. Macs with Aperture and Photoshop.

#20 SkroOob

SkroOob

    Triggerfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 41 posts
  • Location:Saudi Arabia

Posted 01 July 2008 - 06:01 PM

Well well well.
Now isn't this my lucky day. I just happened to have some cash which I wanted to invest in a D300 + housing. Looks like I'm getting a D700, an additional lens and just wait for Ikelite's D700 housing. :)