Jump to content

- - - - -

Landmark image copyright case for Australian courts.

copyright infringement IP copyright

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 JimSwims


    Tiger Shark

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 697 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mornington Peninsula, Australia.

Posted 30 April 2014 - 04:31 AM

Hi Folks,


heartening to read about this case today. I really need to get of my bum and follow up on an infringer myself!!!



Underwater Images   My portfolio on Redbubble   Topside Nature Images

In between housings. Nikon 60mm, 105mm, 10-24mm, 18-55mm, Tokina 10-17mm, Kenko 1.4 TC, SubSee +5 & +10 magnifiers & Inon Z240 strobes.

#2 SwiftFF5


    Tiger Shark

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia, USA
  • Interests:Water Rescue (Public Safety Diving) - yeah, I'm a mud crawler.

Posted 01 May 2014 - 03:27 AM

That seems to be a fairly clear statement, and should set good precedent.  Let's hope other courts follow suit.

Canon Vixia HF-S30, L&M Bluefin Pro
Public Safety Diver

Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: copyright infringement, IP, copyright