Posted 16 November 2005 - 04:48 PM
Trouble is being happy with it I haven't lusted after anything else .... so what should I be looking at???
Working with aerial & satellite imagery at work I have been very unimpressed with the colour resolution of LCDs I had to evaluate.
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:05 PM
I love the pixel density and resolution of my 1600x1200 15" laptop. To me the number of pixels is much more important than the size of the display. In order to get 1600x1200 in a desktop monitor you have to move up to a 21" display? Why does no one take the same LCD that they put in laptops, attach a cord and stand and sell it as a stand alone monitor?
Canon 5D Ikelite Housing and strobes
15FE | 24/2.8 | 35/1.4 | 85/1.8 | 150/2.8 macro
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:22 PM
The 23'' version (1920x1200 pixels) is especially nice.
Now, if you really want the best I would look at this one:
Awesome color with expanded color space that supports Adobe RGB. But it costs around 6k!
Luiz Rocha - www.luizrocha.com
Nikon D800, Aquatica AD800, Ikelite strobes.
Posted 16 November 2005 - 07:55 PM
oooo ... sexy and Mac in the same sentence ... that's a tough call !
It is not a Mac! It is a sexy LCD display!
I looked at the eizo ... pretty sweet Its a shame they don't have better resolution in the 210 ... just blew my pocket money on the D2X though :>
Posted 23 November 2005 - 07:52 PM
Luiz ... I can't believe it! Mac Lust *blush*
It is not a Mac! It is a sexy LCD display! It runs on PCs too (DVI).
Have you played with one? What is the colour gammut like ... is it as good as the publicity blurb??