I was thinking about the negative space around the white tip was good, yet the diver may be too cut off.
5 replies to this topic
#1
caymaniac
-
- Member
-
- 54 posts
Lionfish
- Location:west - Michigan
- Interests:Guitar, reading, nature, skiing - all types, underwater photo., travel, boating.
Posted 19 November 2005 - 09:34 AM
I'm not sure what to do about strobe coverage....
I was thinking about the negative space around the white tip was good, yet the diver may be too cut off.
I was thinking about the negative space around the white tip was good, yet the diver may be too cut off.
#2
Rocha
-
- Senior Moderator
-
- 3078 posts
Salty Dog
- Gender:Male
- Location:California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA
-
Posted 19 November 2005 - 09:59 AM
You are too far from the subject. The strobe light is not getting to the diver, and maybe just weakly to the shark, but it is strong in the coral on the foreground.
Luiz
Luiz
Luiz Rocha - www.luizrocha.com
Nikon D800, Aquatica AD800, Ikelite strobes.
#3
caymaniac
-
- Member
-
- 54 posts
Lionfish
- Location:west - Michigan
- Interests:Guitar, reading, nature, skiing - all types, underwater photo., travel, boating.
Posted 19 November 2005 - 11:13 AM
Latter at the same dive site I took this shot, same settings although the shark is a bit closer
Attached Images
#4
davephdv
-
- Senior Moderator
-
- 2351 posts
Doc Eyeballs
- Gender:Male
- Location:Goleta CA
-
Posted 19 November 2005 - 02:22 PM
The shark's lower lip is blown out. That will kill you in prints and contests. I think your background is a little underexposed.
Dave Burroughs, Nikon D300, D2X, Subal housing, DS160 strobes
Life is a beach and then you dive.
My Website
Life is a beach and then you dive.
My Website
#5
MikeVeitch
-
- Senior Moderator
-
- 6289 posts
1.7kbps Manta Boy
- Gender:Male
- Location:In Bali, Indonesia but from Vancouver, BC
- Interests:Teaching Underwater Photography
-
Posted 21 November 2005 - 02:23 AM
I think you need a nice zoom lens! I used to use a Nik V and 15mm exclusively and my shark shots always sucked because a 6 foot grey reef from 4 feet away always looked like a minnow... Then i got a N90 with an 18-35 zoom, my shark photos took off after that.
If you let us know what sort of kit you are using it would be easier to make some suggestions.
M
If you let us know what sort of kit you are using it would be easier to make some suggestions.
M
Join us for an Underwater Photography Workshop at NAD Lembeh July/Aug 2016 with Doug Sloss
Blog and Photo Archive/Portfolio Site www.mikeveitchblog.com
Learn underwater photography in the ultimate classroom, Bali! or join us on a trip www.underwatertribe.com and www.baliuwphoto.com
Join us for a trip to Raja Ampat in March 2017 on the Mermaid II
#6
caymaniac
-
- Member
-
- 54 posts
Lionfish
- Location:west - Michigan
- Interests:Guitar, reading, nature, skiing - all types, underwater photo., travel, boating.
Posted 21 November 2005 - 10:32 AM
I have been using a sigma 28/close focus lens on my Ike housed pentax with a dome port. I can focus on something within 6 to 8 inches and still have a wide angle such as the shark photos.
I've used elements to improve the blown out portion of the shark lip, does it look alot better?
I've used elements to improve the blown out portion of the shark lip, does it look alot better?
