DIVE Magazine, Big Shot
Posted 28 November 2005 - 09:12 AM
DIVE contacted me about this in early October and I directed them to this Bali Gallery, mainly taken in September: http://www.amustard.com/bali/ to see if there was anything they thought suitable. They went with this shot, which initially surprised me, but actually now it is printed I am pleased with what it looks like, and it does make for a very colourful double page spread. But if it was my choice I would not have gone for this image. They wanted a change after Steve Jones's whaleshark in the previous issue.
I think I would have gone for the orange seahorse face or the yellow frogfish face. Or maybe one of the octopuses. It is often hard to judge shots from your own images, especially only a few days after shooting them. Do others find this a surprising choice or not?
You can read the article here
Posted 28 November 2005 - 10:00 AM
One thing I noticed was that the image that you posted here is much more saturated than the one in the site. I can clearly see the difference in the sponge, in my monitor, it looks redish/orange here and brownish/yellow in the site. Did they make the modification themselves or did you submit a printer-optimized version?
Another question, what lens did you use for this shot? It is a great shot.
Luiz Rocha - www.luizrocha.com
Nikon D800, Aquatica AD800, Ikelite strobes.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 11:30 AM
My feeling is that the one I submitted was more saturated than the web gallery one, but I think that they have also up the saturation a bit, presumably to go with the Neon title? I don't have the original submission file, must have deleted it, so I can't be sure. It looks like it could have been shot on Velvia, except it is too sharp!
It was taken with the 105mm and +4 dioptre at Menjangan Island, Bali.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 02:31 PM
"It's much better down there... It's a better place..." Enzo, Le Grand Bleu.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 02:42 PM
However, i think it is a strange choice for a double spread, the reasoning is that the subject is bang in the middle and therefore gets split by the seam in the page. Usually two page spreads have an off centre subject in order to fit everything in.
Oh well, i wouldn't be complaining that is for sure!
Join us for an Underwater Photography Workshop at NAD Lembeh July/Aug 2016 with Doug Sloss
Blog and Photo Archive/Portfolio Site www.mikeveitchblog.com
Learn underwater photography in the ultimate classroom, Bali! or join us on a trip www.underwatertribe.com and www.baliuwphoto.com
Join us for a trip to Raja Ampat in March 2017 on the Mermaid II
Posted 28 November 2005 - 05:24 PM
That shot caught my eye in your gallery before. But maybe more so because it's the super macro stuff I like anyway. The shot is flush with color so it really catches the eye.
As Mike mentioned, having part of the photo pinched in the middle of the mag is a bit distracting. But I've got experience carefully removing the staples so it will hang fairly flat on the wall.
And while I'm at it, the BBC Wildlife portfolio arrived in my mail and your pics are very well represented there. A true feast for the eyes.
Nikon D2X. Subal ND2. 2 Inon Z220S
Posted 01 December 2005 - 04:24 PM
But the seam down the middle... ugh
Posted 01 December 2005 - 06:25 PM
As is often the lament of underwater photo pros...""But my best shot..they did not publish?" I feel your pain...
Jett Britnell Photographics
Member: Ocean Artists Society (Phorographer)
Nikon D800 in Aquatica Housing, twin Sea & Sea YS-D1's.
Posted 01 December 2005 - 10:14 PM
that made me laugh ... trying to say alex normally screws up the exposure ?
, good exposure for you.
btw i love the photo .. but dont like it split down the middle of a double page like that ...
surprised they used it no .... dont get surprised that much ... but i am surprised you gave full reign and didn't choose one for them.