I recently found one of my Raggedtooth shark pictures on a S.A gov website.
By chance.These guys even gave my shark a name: Maxine?
http://www.space.gov...maltracking.php
The most irritating issue is that they imply that the picture is taken in an aquarium ( not good for my ego.. ;-)
The photo was taken on a night dive in Scottborough ,R.S.A
No idea where they got it from , was published in a dive magazine
Do any of you have similar experiences , and what did you do?
Unauthorised use
Started by aboshoff, Jan 02 2006 12:45 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 January 2006 - 12:45 PM
#2
Posted 02 January 2006 - 05:19 PM
You'll find that a good number of members here have found themselves in similar situations. This threads is a good read, even though it is not based on RSA law:
http://wetpixel.com/...?showtopic=9543
http://wetpixel.com/...?showtopic=9543
#3
Posted 06 January 2006 - 06:24 PM
I would write to the website admin and let them know.
RSA is known for a bit of latltude in image usage. Had a friend who sent a demo CD with images and the journalist used the images under his own name. In a magazine no less. I forgot how it ended but the magazine was embarassed.
RSA is known for a bit of latltude in image usage. Had a friend who sent a demo CD with images and the journalist used the images under his own name. In a magazine no less. I forgot how it ended but the magazine was embarassed.
Drew
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#4
Posted 07 January 2006 - 08:11 AM
Most legitimate magazines and websites are just that; Legitimate. I have had similar experiences with agencies that work with or for a government and a lot of the times these people just don't know about image usage rights. However, that is not an excuse for them to do wrong. The picture is a nice one and I am sure they would like to continue using it for the time being, especially since they went to the trouble of giving a name. As was mentioned in an earlier thread, send an email to them stating that while you are happy your image is on the site you are curious as to how they received acess to your image as it was only published in a magazine once and see what they have to say. You may even want to include a very lo rez copyrighted image of the shark with the letter. The result will be twofold. They will see you truly did take the image, and it is copyrighted work. That will leave the decision maker on their side with a choice of what to do next. You will probably recieve a flurry of accolades for your work, numerous apologies and perhaps offered some compensation. Give them a week to respond. If you hear nothing, send the letter again with a FAIR invoice for the usage of the image on their site. Wait a few more days. If you get no response, send them an invoice attatched with ANY COPYRIGHT LAWS YOU CAN FIND. Works everytime!
I played cat and mouse with a magazine last year for about two months and the editor actually said he took the picture which was cleary mine. A standard letter with stated copyright laws, attached invoice and an invitation to resolve the matter quickly will get them hoppin'. Good luck, hope this helps
I played cat and mouse with a magazine last year for about two months and the editor actually said he took the picture which was cleary mine. A standard letter with stated copyright laws, attached invoice and an invitation to resolve the matter quickly will get them hoppin'. Good luck, hope this helps
Underwater Lightroom - Manage, Edit, Showcase - Make it Easy on Yourself
Underwater Photoshop - Take digital editing to a new level...
Underwater Photoshop - Take digital editing to a new level...
#5
Posted 07 January 2006 - 08:33 AM
Thank you very much for the advice.Will certainly pursue it.
Regards
Anton
Regards
Anton
