Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Contest Winners Posted


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#21 mrbubbles

mrbubbles

    Eagle Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 368 posts
  • Location:los angeles ca
  • Interests:medical doctor and wanabe photographer

Posted 27 February 2006 - 10:54 AM

alex, i for one stuck with nikon for the reasons you gave. i always thought it would be interesting to put same nikon and canon photos next to eachother to compare

#22 scorpio_fish

scorpio_fish

    Orca

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas, TX

Posted 27 February 2006 - 11:31 AM

Thanks Karl. I really not as stupid as I appear.

I knew I was in trouble when I saw Ron Boyes entries that didn't make it. Somewhere around 8 of them were better than any of mine.

The quality of these "amatuer" submissions proves my theory.
"Me, fail English?.........Unpossible!"

#23 TheQ

TheQ

    Moray Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 84 posts
  • Location:Madison, WI

Posted 27 February 2006 - 11:35 AM

I would agree with Alex's observations as well. With the 10D and a collection EF lenses, I sat on the fence for years until the 5D came out. Prior to the EF-S 10-22 there was no way to get true ultra wide (weitwinkel) angle on the Canon 1.5 crop DSLRs. Canon still lacks a 180 fisheye for the 1.5 crop.

The 1Ds series has always been in the stratosphere pricewise (same goes for the 1D enclosures).

#24 kdietz

kdietz

    Orca

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth, Texas

Posted 27 February 2006 - 02:27 PM

Thanks Karl.  I really not as stupid as I appear.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


George, I was speaking from experience :P :D I couldn't find them the first time either.

Karl
Karl Dietz...Nikon D200...Ikelite iTTL housing...10.5mm...15mm FE...12-24mm...17-35mm...60mm micro...105mm micro...dual DS-200's
www.kdietz.com

#25 DeanB

DeanB

    Humpback Whale

  • Industry
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3073 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:U.K

Posted 28 February 2006 - 09:39 AM

Hey I know !!!

What about a video contest... :D

Say with a time limit so it doesn't get to 'over the top' and also in different formats so we all can enter.

That would be (as our American buddies say) AWESOME !!!

Just an Idea :D

I feel left out. boo hoo :P

Dive safe

DeanB
Facebook me ;)
NOW ON SKYPE !!! ... deanb69
www.waterwolf-productions.co.uk

#26 MikeVeitch

MikeVeitch

    1.7kbps Manta Boy

  • Senior Moderator
  • 6193 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:In Bali, Indonesia but from Vancouver, BC
  • Interests:Teaching Underwater Photography

Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:08 AM

Spend more money Dean.... stop moaning!

:P:D:D:D:D:

Join us for an Underwater Photography Workshop in Ambon March 2015
Blog and Photo Archive/Portfolio Site www.mikeveitchblog.com
Learn underwater photography in Indonesia or Join me on a trip www.underwatertribe.com


#27 Scubaskeeter

Scubaskeeter

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 147 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Posted 02 March 2006 - 04:46 PM

Do the judges view the images full size (actual pixels)? The rules said they would be viewd on a "large" monitor.

#28 echeng

echeng

    The Blue

  • Admin
  • 5844 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco, CA
  • Interests:photography, ice cream, cello, chamber music, quadcopters

Posted 02 March 2006 - 07:29 PM

Yes, we look at actual pixels, but we take resolution into account, and what it looks like on a "large" monitor. If the images won't print well, they'll have a hard time placing well.
eric cheng
publisher/editor, wetpixel
www | journal | photos


#29 onokai

onokai

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 193 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arcata
  • Interests:U/W photo-Diving-Tuna fishing

Posted 02 March 2006 - 11:46 PM

Some really great shot's Congrats to the winners as well as all who entered. Mark
2 Subal procase 5- Housings
2 Aquatica f/3 housings
Nikon film f/5's and f/3's cameras
Way to many strobes to list
All that Nikonos junk
and now a subal d300 setup
Still a film divasourus with a baby toe in digital world

#30 Kelpfish

Kelpfish

    Giant Squid

  • Industry
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1602 posts
  • Location:California

Posted 03 March 2006 - 03:05 AM

Eric,

So, how do you tell good pixels from bad ones...I mean, what specific criteria do you use? What do those new to digital need to look for when preparing images so that their pixels are perfect?

Joe
Joe Belanger
Author, Catalina Island - All you Need to Know
www.californiaunderwater.com
www.visitingcatalina.com

#31 Scubaskeeter

Scubaskeeter

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 147 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Posted 04 March 2006 - 05:09 AM

Eric, just to add to Joe's and my questions. If the image is actually the minimum 2000px wide, what size print do you consider as good? Mine look pretty good on paper 8x10in at that resolution, but natch, if you blow 'em up to bigger, the quality/sharpness degrades.

P.S. Eric, thanks for putting this contest together, it IS a lot of work. I really apreciate the special category for us compact shooters!!!

#32 NWDiver

NWDiver

    Orca

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1274 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 04 March 2006 - 07:12 AM

I will add my rookie questions. Do you save from raw in 8bit/channel or 16bit/channel? For those of us with 6mega pixel cameras is resolution of 240dpi sufficent?