I have just had sighting of a review (on land) carried out by Jon Tarrant for the BJOP magazine on the SD9. The conclusions are not very complementary.
"Sigma's camera is more limited than other digital SLR's & leaves a lot to be desired in terms of image quality at its highest sensitivity- a modest ISO400. Colour has been variable throughout testing;sometimes excellent & occasionall just plain wrong. The best that can be said is that the writers time may have been entirely wasted"
Oh dear! I thought the Foveon X3 was to be the next immediate techno breakthrough. Perhaps we will have to wait a bit longer.
Still its only one opinion. Time will tell.
Does anyone else have any other reviews on this?
Mark H
Sigma SD9 review
Started by markh, Jan 09 2003 08:23 AM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 January 2003 - 08:23 AM
Dirk Pitt taught me everything!!!!
E10/Titan housing/1 x Sea & Sea 90 Duo
E10/Titan housing/1 x Sea & Sea 90 Duo
#2
Posted 09 January 2003 - 08:31 AM
Use the force young siltwalker...
There are several references to reviews throughout the forum's regarding the SD9's +/-'s.
It should be noted that the so called review in Novembers BJOP was done with a preproduction unit on its 11th review. The cover of the magazine was actually shot using just half of the chips potential (bit of a gibbon tho').
There are several references to reviews throughout the forum's regarding the SD9's +/-'s.
It should be noted that the so called review in Novembers BJOP was done with a preproduction unit on its 11th review. The cover of the magazine was actually shot using just half of the chips potential (bit of a gibbon tho').
#3
Posted 09 January 2003 - 08:36 AM
Thanks for clarifying that Bob. Is there anything you do not know?
Dirk Pitt taught me everything!!!!
E10/Titan housing/1 x Sea & Sea 90 Duo
E10/Titan housing/1 x Sea & Sea 90 Duo
