Sad Ikelite Flooding Story w/ Uncanny Happy Ending
#1
Posted 07 September 2006 - 07:10 AM
#2
Posted 07 September 2006 - 09:54 AM
SD
#3
Posted 07 September 2006 - 03:45 PM
#4
Posted 08 September 2006 - 11:41 AM
rinjani
Website: http://www.jonbertsch.com, http://www.thalassagraphics.com
D200...Ikelite Housing...Ike DS125...Nik 105mm|Tam 90mm, Tokina 10-17mm...Nik V
#5
Posted 02 October 2006 - 06:47 AM
#6
Posted 03 October 2006 - 06:15 PM
That is great news they sparked you up, and way to go Ikelite!
Sony HDR-FX1 3CCD HiDef
Amphibico Phenom
Amphibico dual 35-50 HID's
whatever other toys I can
accumulate b4 I die
#7
Posted 03 October 2006 - 06:21 PM
Sea & Sea strobes
www.underthecaribbean.com
#8
Posted 04 October 2006 - 03:53 AM
I don't hear people with mega $$$$$ housings think their mfr. has crappy quality when a button doesn't line up, ports leak due to change in o-ring specification, etc.....
Nothing's perfect and at least they made good on his problem
But not the big buck ones.....
YMMV
dhaas
www.haasimages.com
#9
Posted 04 October 2006 - 11:14 AM
Any port or part can fail. Plus how many THOUSANDS of Ikelite ports are out there......(??????)
I don't hear people with mega $$$$$ housings think their mfr. has crappy quality when a button doesn't line up, ports leak due to change in o-ring specification, etc.....
Nothing's perfect and at least they made good on his problemHaven't read of ANY other housing mfr. replacing a camera due to their error.....OK, maybe those crappy little Olympus housings that they had a couple problems with one model I can think of....
But not the big buck ones.....
YMMV
dhaas
It's Ikelite. I'm not surprised. They have always gone above and beyond the call of duty with me. They are head and shoulders above the rest when it comes to taking care of their customers. Way to go Ike!!!
Sony HC9 in L&M Bluefin housing with 1000 LED lights.
#10
Posted 04 October 2006 - 06:00 PM
But Kudos to Ikelite for quickly fixing the problem. In the past they've even sent cameras and housings to other customers in exotic locations (Bonaire most recently).
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#11
Posted 05 October 2006 - 03:04 AM
#12
Posted 05 October 2006 - 01:18 PM
Screws strip, glue comes undone, circuit boards blow up, etc.....It happens.....To say a port, which is the only one I've ever heard of (and I know a LOT of Ikelite users out there) coming apart is "unacceptable" is a pretty broad brush stroke...
So I sure hope if anyone here on Wetpixel who has a Subal, Nexxus, Seacam Hugyfoyt or whatever has a problem with ANY part of their system, they'll post it and then we all can consider if it's "unacceptable" .
But I doubt we'll ever hear those complaints
dhaas
www.haasimages.com
#13
Posted 05 October 2006 - 01:46 PM
I figured you'd come to the rescue on this one - hopefully my remark didn't sound as harsh as you guys are making it out to be. If my port just fell apart I'd be pretty upset, especially if it flooded my $3,000 camera, and put an abrupt stop to my $4,000 underwater photo vacation.
As an engineer, I know that some components are inherently more unreliable than others. Typically, the more parts and fasteners, the more unreliable. As the complexity goes up, the need for quality assurance, quality control, and testing goes up too.
Because of the above, and if I understand correctly, Ikelite does an in-water pressure test of their equipment as quality control, before it gets sold.
On the other hand, you can reduce complexity by design. My Seacam port is machined out of a tube of delrin. There is a port glass press-fit into the end, if it gets scratched, you can remove it yourself and replace it. There are no zoom or focus knobs on the port, because they are on the housing. There is no glue to fail, there are no parts to come apart. It's an awesome design - probably one of the reasons you don't hear complaints about it.
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#14
Posted 06 October 2006 - 04:33 AM
I have owned many housings over the eyars, and I understand the "bore seal" type many use as you describe. Using a type of glue that literally "melts" the two parts together is what I think Ikelite does. And evidently it works based on the thousands (easily thousands) of ports produced over the years....So I really wasn't trying to defend something that needs defending.
If you go on a $4K dive trip and your computer, regulator, etc. craps out, what do you do? You IMPROVISE...I've done it and many friends have done it so it should be part of your plan. When the best laid schemes go awry for PROS working in the field, they compromise their shooting ideas, etc. and come back with SOMETHING from the destination. I have really surprised myself with some happy results caused by problems.....Not trying to be unsympathetic......
I also agree that simple things work best as James states. But I sure don't see ideas of simplicity on this and other UW Photography message boards.....I see people "engineering" all types of bolt on, glue on, add on buoyancy tubes, light holders, port mounting gizmos, etc. And maybe that's part of the fun of this activity just like any hobby. Just kind of reminds me of bad TV shows like "Pimp My Ride"
I know many people after sacrificing mucho' $$$$ for a dSLR body can't afford a spare....But it sure can save the day in the odd situation.....Plus a back up plan to shoot with a different lens / port since usually the housing is OK and can be dried out and keep on workin to some extent.
A good conversation, with room for everyone's opinion....
dhaas
www.haasimages.com
#15
Posted 06 October 2006 - 06:14 AM
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#16
Posted 06 October 2006 - 04:26 PM
One problem with the forums is that we pretty much only hear about horror stories. Whichever vendor sells the most product will probably have the most happy and the most unhappy customers. If we only hear about the latter, we can get an unrealistic impression of the actual failure rate. This doesn't mean that the horror stories are meaningless. It just means you have to take them with a grain of salt. On the other hand, if you hear about the same failure mode several times there is probably some truth to it.
Personally I ended up not buying an Ikelite housing for my 5D since I wasn't happy with port design and the housing was just too boxy for my tastes. A bigger factor was that because several friends have had a lot of problems with their Ikelite housings for other cameras. Problems including multiple housing and strobe failures. Perhaps they were just careless, but I didn't want to take the chance. Having great customer service is wonderful, but not if you have to call upon them too often!
www.flickr.com/photos/drsteve/
homepage.mac.com/gbeckert
Canon EOS 5D, Aquatica Housing, Inon Z220+Z240 strobes, Heinrichs TTL, ULCS Arms
#17
Posted 07 October 2006 - 06:42 AM
Ask your California dive buddy Will (as in Will Chen of Santa Barbara) how he used and "abused" his Canon 5D Ikelite housing for a week with me in the Bahamas shark diving. Seems to me he (like dozens of happy Ikelite customers of mine) got some great shots with his Canon 5D. Plus the "boxy" size you refer to has been measured over and over on this and other forums....We're talking like an inch or two in either dimensions, with no room for flood error IMHO.
While I hear you on your photographer friend's recommendations and problems I've found 99% of problems to be user error. Many have never read the manual before their big $$$$ trip. Or gone to a pool.....They think because they spent some Bling Bling it will automatically turn them into a great photographer. I see lots of "snapshots" taken with $10K or more of stuff. Not picking on anyone since I truly believe only YOU should be happy with your shots. Just making a point that the same camera body and lenses go into many waterproof boxes....Then it's up to the musician to make the instrument sing
Maybe it's also because they didn't have someone familiar with the Ikelite sytems show them the correct way to get the most out of their new housing or strobe. I don't know.....
As you fairly state, when you sell the most products you are likely to hear more problems just by sheer numbers.
Too bad the majority who are making photos with their Ikelite products don't post as often.....It would be a flood on most forums
YMMV
dhaas
www.haasimages.com
#18
Posted 07 October 2006 - 08:00 AM
I agree that most failures are user errors, but I hear the number 99% bandied about, which I think is an exaggeration. There clearly are manufacutring defects that are not the user's problems. Consider this thread for example, having the port fall apart was not user error! I have another friend who had her strobe flood because an internal o-ring wasn't installed during manufacturing. On our recent Sipidan trip, Will had one of the rubber pads fall off his mode dial control. We won't mention the two 20D's that Will flooded
What would be valuable, but nearly impossible, is to separate out the user error/poor maintenace problems from the design/manufacturing issues. Don't get me wrong, I am certainly not anti-Ikelite, I was just trying to explain why I went a different direction.
We also have to consider that although some designs are more prone to user error than others. Again, it is hard to tell from case studies.
www.flickr.com/photos/drsteve/
homepage.mac.com/gbeckert
Canon EOS 5D, Aquatica Housing, Inon Z220+Z240 strobes, Heinrichs TTL, ULCS Arms
#19
Posted 07 October 2006 - 08:48 AM
I agree that there are (and always will be) mfg. problems. I just think it's hilarious that people expect perfection.....I could do a search here (and on DDN) and find similar "mfg. failures" on Aquatica, Nexxus, Subal, Seacam, INON and many other brands.
I WILL admit to being biased because of the volume of Ikelite products out there, that I feel customer satisfaction will likely never be 100% successful.
Will and I talked about his floods. I can't remember if he felt it was him or the equipment. I know he feels a bit better after me showing him some tips.
I just seem to hear lots of people whining the equipment (and this applies to ALL brands) doesn't work when it usually is the user who:
1) Doesn't understand some basic mechanics of how something should go together.
2) Isn't willing to read the dang instructions which is SOOOOO prevalent on cameras, strobes, housings, etc. that I want to scream!!!
3) Never calm down and think through a problem....
Again, I equate this to the Bling Bling scenario....
In the end, we should be happy there are mfg. companies out there willing to invest significant time and $$$$$ to provide us with tools to show the world the undersea environment. We are a very, very small market when it comes to photography.
Enjoyed the discussion.....
dhaas
www.haasimages.com
#20
Posted 07 October 2006 - 09:28 AM
I am happy (and amazed) at the range of underwater products that serve our small market. Of course the smallness of the market is why the products are so expensive. I doubt anyone is getting rich, but there must be some profit in the business. When I was looking for 5D housings I found offerings from nine companies! (Ikelite, Aquatica, Subal, Seacam, Sea&Sea, Nexus, Hugyfot, Sealux, UK). All for one model of camera!
I also agree that people would be better served by reading the user documentation, although it can be hilarious. My Aquatica housing instructions (which are for the 20D since the 5D manual wasn't written yet) actually tells the user to remove and clean the o-rings AFTER EVERY dive. It also proceeds to tell the user that after installing the o-rings that you should do a pressure test to 30 feet without the camera by lowering over the side of the boat on a rope. Can you imagine doing this after EVERY dive?! I asked one of the owners of Aquatica why the instructions were so unrealistic and she basically told me they were CYA instructions.
www.flickr.com/photos/drsteve/
homepage.mac.com/gbeckert
Canon EOS 5D, Aquatica Housing, Inon Z220+Z240 strobes, Heinrichs TTL, ULCS Arms
