Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

diaphragm


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 herwin

herwin

    Starfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 31 January 2003 - 05:43 AM

when in manual mode, it is kind of convenient to know about diaphragm; doubling the shutter value requires half of the diaphragma; so F8 with 1/200 seconds, can be changed into F11 with 1/100 seconds (more depht.) so the half of F22 is F16, half of F16 is F11, half of F11 is F8. but then ?? i want to know up to F2. how can i calculate?

#2 bobjarman

bobjarman

    Manta Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 404 posts
  • Location:Nashville, TN

Posted 31 January 2003 - 06:24 AM

http://www.davis.k12...oto/Fstops.html


Remeber, it is half the area, not necessarily half the number. Above link is a nice article on your question.


f/1 f/1.4 f/2 f/2.8 f/4 f/5.6 f/8 f/11 f/16 f/22 f/32 and on to infinity and beyond. For those who don't want to look up the site. :)

#3 Cybergoldfish

Cybergoldfish

    Sperm Whale

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1954 posts
  • Location:UK */Seychelles/Singapore
  • Interests:Don't include plankton

Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:06 AM

Remember, even the smallest of holes in a diaphram can lead to unwanted artifacts.

#4 tshepherd

tshepherd

    Great Hammerhead

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 880 posts
  • Location:Westfield, NJ, USA

Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:08 AM

I wasn't even going to touch that one...

#5 craig

craig

    Full Moon Rising

  • Super Mod
  • 2826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin, TX

Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:08 AM

Would that be a technique or a tip, Bob?
I love it when a plan comes together.
- Col. John "Hannibal" Smith

------
Nikon, Seatool, Nexus, Inon
My Galleries

#6 Cybergoldfish

Cybergoldfish

    Sperm Whale

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1954 posts
  • Location:UK */Seychelles/Singapore
  • Interests:Don't include plankton

Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:11 AM

Deffinately a tip!

#7 bobjarman

bobjarman

    Manta Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 404 posts
  • Location:Nashville, TN

Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:19 AM

wow, now theres a scary thought!

#8 herwin

herwin

    Starfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 31 January 2003 - 11:35 AM

thanks for the answer! :)

#9 Ressner

Ressner

    Starfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
  • Location:St Louis, MO

Posted 08 February 2003 - 09:12 AM

Here's an answer from someone who's pretty good in math but not necessarily all that knowledgable about cameras. So don't hammer me if I get a camera detail wrong, OK?

Someone said above, "remember it's half the area, not necessarily half the number." Certainly true, but that doesn't directly answer the question, "How can I calculate?"

The first little problem is that as the f/stop number gets bigger, the amount of light getting through is less. A help here is to think of the f/stop number as the denominator of a fraction that relates to the diameter of the diaphragm, like f/2 is a diameter of 1/2, f/8 is a diameter of 1/8, etc. Smaller diameter, less light.

Now, the amount of light getting through is proportional to the area of the diaphragm opening. To double the area and light (to multiply it by 2), you have to multiply the diameter by the square root of 2 (or 1.414-ish).

So each full f/stop is derived from the previous one by multiplying by 1.414-ish and rounding a bit. Just remember that multiplying gives you a bigger number so you're really reducing the amount of light by 2x, not increasing.

f/4 x 1.414 = f/5.656 (mfr round to 5.6) = half the exposure of f/4
f/8 x 1.414 = f/11.312 (mfr round to 11) = half the exposure of f/8
etc.

#10 scottyb

scottyb

    Eagle Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 357 posts

Posted 08 February 2003 - 03:36 PM

I never knew the correlation of the numbers. The only problem is that we are dealing with reciprocals and as the number goes up the area is going down. So I believe you are multiplying it by 1/1.414 . F4 is 1/4 multiply that by 1/1.414 = +1/5.6 which is F5.6. It still works but it's just a bass ackwards way of thinking about it.

The math works, are we correct in all this?

#11 james

james

    The Engineer

  • Super Mod
  • 9969 posts
  • Location:Houston TX

Posted 09 February 2003 - 08:19 PM

Yep... Good posts!

Cheers
James
Canon 1DsMkIII - Seacam Housing
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org