Jump to content


Photo

BUOYANCY PROBLEM WITH FISHEYE DOME PORT


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 tecdivertraining

tecdivertraining

    Sea Wasp

  • Member
  • 2 posts

Posted 06 October 2006 - 07:00 AM

Hi All

I am new to this board and am in search of some advice. I have recently added a fisheye dome to my sea & sea housing and am finding that its now very positive in the water any tips on the best way to combat this.

Thanks matt

#2 fdog

fdog

    Eagle Ray

  • Industry
  • 395 posts
  • Location:Reno NV

Posted 06 October 2006 - 07:13 AM

Wrap an ankle weight around the throat (the done port's, not yours!)

All the best, James

#3 tecdivertraining

tecdivertraining

    Sea Wasp

  • Member
  • 2 posts

Posted 06 October 2006 - 08:54 PM

Wrap an ankle weight around the throat (the done port's, not yours!)

All the best, James



Thanks James I will give it a go.

cheers matt

#4 tdpriest

tdpriest

    Sperm Whale

  • Member
  • 1809 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Solihull, UK
  • Interests:Diving medicine, warm water, scenery...

Posted 07 October 2006 - 02:04 AM

What port and housing are you using? I've not found a big problem with an aluminium alloy housing and a big acrylic dome when I have strobe arms attached (indeed, I've lightened my system with floating arm segments).

In general, the expensive glass domes don't cause this problem.

I'm a bit worried about the strain that is on the port if a weight is wrapped around it. Would a small weight (0.5-1.0kg) fastened to your housing with cable ties be better?

If the centre of bouyancy is offset, and the housing twists with the port floating, it's easier to manipulate with solid handles. I find the Nexus handles particularly good, as my big port does twist like this when my strobes are at the typical 45-degree position. It's easier if they at the same level as the dome, which might be a better position anyway.

Tim

B)

#5 hoovermd

hoovermd

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • 273 posts

Posted 07 October 2006 - 05:36 AM

If the centre of bouyancy is offset, and the housing twists with the port floating, it's easier to manipulate with solid handles. I find the Nexus handles particularly good, as my big port does twist like this when my strobes are at the typical 45-degree position. It's easier if they at the same level as the dome, which might be a better position anyway.

Tim

B)




This is a shot of my rig w/ a single SS200 strobe floating freely (well actually sinking a bit). I find the propensity of the dome to twist like this not at all annoying. I do agree that two handles would make things easier to handle though...


ofloating.jpg
---------------
Mark

#6 UWphotoNewbie

UWphotoNewbie

    Great Hammerhead

  • Member
  • 845 posts
  • Location:Broomfield, Colorado

Posted 17 October 2006 - 08:05 AM

It helps to remind you to shoot up!
UWPhotoNewbie
Total newbie to diving and UW photography.
Nikon D70: 60 mm, 12-24mm, 105mm, 15mm, 10.5mm, 18-200mm
Ikelite iTTL Housing, dual Ikelite DS125
Canon Digital Elph Canon Housing, S&S 15mm and 2x lenses

#7 james

james

    The Engineer

  • Super Mod
  • 9966 posts
  • Location:Houston TX

Posted 17 October 2006 - 12:35 PM

Hoover,

How do you like your housing? I haven't used a UK Germany in a while, but I loved their D60 housing.

Cheers
James
Canon 1DsMkIII - Seacam Housing
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org

#8 hoovermd

hoovermd

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • 273 posts

Posted 21 October 2006 - 04:27 PM

Hoover,

How do you like your housing? I haven't used a UK Germany in a while, but I loved their D60 housing.

Cheers
James



Really love it. Nice workmanship and the balance is pretty nice.
I can get to all the functions of the camera.

I'm having a heck of a time getting the port centered because friggin' Canon refuses to tell me where the entrance pupil is for my 14mm. I built a rig and did the calcs but the edges still seem soft. I need to get in a pool in the daylight so I can make sure it isn't aperture related.

Uwe is one of the few folks making a flat port that is large enough diameter for my 85 mm F1.2 L glass. I played around with that and can't wait to try some seal lion portraits with it.

I actually have 2 housings. One for me and the other for the wife. Insta-spare :D I mean the camera not the woman.
---------------
Mark