Sony FX1 viewfinder melting??!!
#1
Posted 19 October 2006 - 10:53 AM
thanks,
chris
#2
Posted 19 October 2006 - 11:06 AM
Are you sure you didn't leave it somewhere without the lens cap on? It wouldn't take long to get up to a dangerous temperature in strong sunshine.
#3
Posted 19 October 2006 - 11:57 AM
#4
Posted 19 October 2006 - 02:30 PM
The rear viewfinder in the housing acts as an intense magnifying glass. Ever hold a magnifying glass over some paper or dry grass the hot sun...it can flame in seconds. Now imagine sensitive miniature lcds and plastic in very intense sunlight. it doesn't take long at all. my bet is on direct sun exposure.
Shawn
www.bluespheremedia.com
#5
Posted 19 October 2006 - 06:29 PM
I was just reading the owner's manual to my new Bluefin (thanks Shawn, thanks Wags!) and I came across the warning about keeping the eyepiece cover on lest you melt the viewfinder on your FX1/Z1. I kinda did that sideways-dog face and womdered aloud if this was really an issue.
After the money I just plunked down and the anecdotes listed here, I will never, ever let my camera sit inside that housing without covering that eyepiece and I will absolutely never discount a warning in a manual.
Thanks. In advance.
#6
Posted 19 October 2006 - 07:49 PM
www.bluespheremedia.com
#7
Posted 19 October 2006 - 07:52 PM
#8
Posted 21 October 2006 - 04:43 AM
cw
#9
Posted 21 October 2006 - 01:05 PM
Just call it some sort of syndrome.....and blather on about how you just didn't wake up one day and decide to be a Dee De Dee...so it MUST be genetic.
I remember reading my Phenom manual.....well, okay, just a few paragraphs, and sure enough, it says to cover the viewing port and lens...so I keep a wet towel over it which makes it clingly and less likely to blow away.
Edited by RebreatherDave, 21 October 2006 - 01:07 PM.
Sony HDR-FX1 3CCD HiDef
Amphibico Phenom
Amphibico dual 35-50 HID's
whatever other toys I can
accumulate b4 I die
#10
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:11 PM
#11
Posted 21 October 2006 - 08:27 PM
But you're in the United States.....our National Sport is always using the court system to blame everyone ELSE for our own shortcomings and mistakes!
Just call it some sort of syndrome.....and blather on about how you just didn't wake up one day and decide to be a Dee De Dee...so it MUST be genetic.
=I remember reading my Phenom manual.....well, okay, just a few paragraphs, and sure enough, it says to cover the viewing port and lens...so I keep a wet towel over it which makes it clingly and less likely to blow away.
While I don't share the litigious tendencies of my fellow denizens, I have to say that ever since there were LCD VF coupled with a magnified viewfinder, there's been this problem. It's been around for decades. However, since it was Hi 8 and DV which helped u/w videographer into the mainstream casual diver level, it happens much more frequently than many believe. How long did it take for someone to build a shade into the housing? 2001, S&S finally put one in the VH2k housing.
Should the manufacturer tell you if there's a chance that the VF could fry your LCD? Or should you have the common sense to know that magnifier + sunlight= focused beam of photons which can fry stuff?
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#12
Posted 22 October 2006 - 05:52 AM
The vast majority of the damage happened on a trip to the Azores in July when the sun is at its hottest. I am absolutely obsessed with port covers and eye caps, in addition to covering the housing with a wet towel between dives. In fact, my fellow boat mates and crewmembers probably think that I am a bit of a dick about it. That is why I was dubious about sun damage. I was also suspicious about internal heat because of the pattern of the heat damage around the viewfinder on the plastic housing. I asked gates about it and they said that they had heard about a guy in Europe who gotten Sony to admit responsibility. However, The missing part of the equation was that I was filming sperm whales and finbacks while they were at the surface and so I spent a inordinate amount of time floating around waiting to be picked up by the boat or swimming the couple of hundred yards over to the whales. I kept my housing a bit positively buoyant so that it didn't get knocked out of my hand and follow the whales down to bottom in 3000' of water. So, I think that it happened while I was either swimming, waiting, or high fiving my fellow cameraman.
cw
#13
Posted 22 October 2006 - 08:11 AM
It wasn't a crack but a serious question about the responsibilities of the housing manufacturers and end users. It's obvious that this problem occurs much more frequently and only in the recent years, manufacturers have made features to prevent it(internal eye shade or a neoprene cover etc). Now if someone new buys a housing, he cannot reasonably be expected to know this problem. BUT he is expected to read the manual (which many don't). Sure the manufacturer can also put neon signs up on the VF to tell users of the potential dangers. But is that necessary?
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#14
Posted 22 October 2006 - 09:40 AM
Scubadru- I know you didn't mean anything, sarcasm is just so difficult over the internet. I'm going to stop trying.
Is that true that this is happening more often in recent years?
#15
Posted 22 October 2006 - 11:17 AM
Some of our LCD wrist rebreather computer/controllers have been known to have some sun damage that tends to disappear somehwat once it gets wet, but on the surface looks lame. Through our Inspiration e-mail listserve, we learned that only the highest quality lcd displays have less problems with direct sunlight.
That clued me in to covering the top, non-magnifying port on the Phenom. I can see how without giving it thought, one might not have the concept of sunlight on a magnified eyepiece damaging an lcd display cross their mind. It is not like us videographers don't have enough task loading while diving to begin with!
Sony HDR-FX1 3CCD HiDef
Amphibico Phenom
Amphibico dual 35-50 HID's
whatever other toys I can
accumulate b4 I die
#16
Posted 23 October 2006 - 12:42 AM
Is that true that this is happening more often in recent years?
What I was saying in cryptic bad grammar is that, the problem has been around as long as LCD VFs have been around. Even SLRs have to be covered to prevent light entering from the VF.
The advent of cheap DV cameras has made video more and more popular. And hence the problem is increasing with the market growth.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#17
Posted 23 October 2006 - 03:35 AM
#18
Posted 23 October 2006 - 03:54 AM
The Shade I made for the Phenom works really well and cuts the glare to it when shooting underwater.
If you are in Aus, Speedy Spares is a good place to get parts for you video camera. I have brought parts for my Hi8, VX1000 and PD100 over the years. Just pull the camera apart and get the number and call then. The also have the schematics so they can pin point your part. Replace a viewfinder is not that hard.
Share Your Underwater Videos www.hdvunderwater.com | www.flykam.com.au | www.reeftorainforest.com.au
#19
Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:47 AM
Fortunately, this only seems to be a problem with angled viewfinders. At least I've never heard of the problem with Mako or BlueFin 900/HC1/HC3 housings.
FX1 owners: replace that viewfinder cap if you leave a BlueFin on the deck.
:-) Barrett
