DV(HDV) Tape Issues
#1
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:30 AM
1) HDV tapes claim a lower dropout and error % vs standard miniDV tapes. And if you have a drop out in HDV format, that's like 1/2 sec vs a few pixels in DV format. So I guess most people will probably say why risk a ruined scene with a once in a lifetime shot just because you were too cheap to pony up for the $12 HDV tapes...
2) don't mix brands due to possible tape lubricant problems with the heads.
Sony HC7 & Gates Housing
My diving photos / My diving videos
#2
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:41 AM
The only extra thing we do is to lay a black signal down on the tape from beginning to end. This combined with the act of rewinding seems to give a pretty reliable performance.
I use Sony HDV masters ( same process ) for really important shoots.
"It's a Sony world "
#3
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:48 AM
#4
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:55 AM
Do you all just stick religiously to Sony HDV specific tapes, or is it safe to dabble with standard miniDV tapes. I can't seem to find anything definitive in the various video forums other than:
1) HDV tapes claim a lower dropout and error % vs standard miniDV tapes. And if you have a drop out in HDV format, that's like 1/2 sec vs a few pixels in DV format. So I guess most people will probably say why risk a ruined scene with a once in a lifetime shot just because you were too cheap to pony up for the $12 HDV tapes...
2) don't mix brands due to possible tape lubricant problems with the heads.
I have not done a full A/B, all I know is that I went with the Sony HDV tapes for my Sony's and shot alot of footage (few hundred tapes) with them with no problem whatsoever. So I guess I am erring to the side of safety and just stick to the Sony's. (Though I did shoot some DV tapes due to people not bringing enough HDV Tapes, we used those in cameras that were not primary ones and they worked, but did not feel comfortable about it.)
The way I see it the cost of jumping on a plane, hotels, food, dive gear, etc. is just so high that go through all that for me is to try to worry about the cost of the tape is de minimis in the grand scheme. I would rather skip a couple of beers or an appetizer during the week if I feel the need to try to save some money. Maybe if I had to chance to shoot alot more underwater I would change, but I just am set in my mindset that I can get 20-30 dives so I figure maybe 10 tapes a trip so about $50 - $70 more for the HDV tape. Someone may have a more definative answer on actual tests between the tapes.
FWIW you can get them for about $8-$9 (maybe better, but I have bought from the two links below)
http://www.taperesou...number=DV60HD-S
http://www.amazon.co...D/dp/B000592UIG
An thread (old one) discussing some issues
http://www.sonyhdvin...read.php?t=1744
#5
Posted 12 August 2007 - 06:11 AM
What about mixing brands? Say switching to Panasonic Dv tapes?
Sony HC7 & Gates Housing
My diving photos / My diving videos
#6
Posted 12 August 2007 - 09:22 AM
Nipped into a tourist shop and all they had was panasonic dv tapes so shot on that in HDV..No probs, no drop outs...
I've also used JVC PRO HD tapes and they worked fine...
Dive safe
DeanB
#7
Posted 12 August 2007 - 10:17 AM
DiveMaster game - casual divemaster simulator for the iPad
The Ships of Darkness - wreck etude and video editing tutorials
#8
Posted 12 August 2007 - 02:16 PM
Interesting about running black first so no time code break..
Jon
www.ginclearfilm.com
www.facebook.com/ginclearfilm
GATES DEEP EPIC Based in Sydney
#9
Posted 12 August 2007 - 02:25 PM
Most people would say never ever mix brands, or if you do at least only mix certain brands. If you are mainly using Sony tapes then Fuji should be fine, but TDK and JVC should be avoided like the plague. Not sure on Panasonic.
Cheers, Simon
#10
Posted 12 August 2007 - 02:44 PM
However, during my last trip there was a kid on the boat with a HC3. He used the same non-Sony standard DV tape for 9 days of diving, 2 sub dives and land excursions. He would down load to a hard drive and rewind. He never had a problem. I asked him why he was only using one tape and he said the organization that sent him only gave him one tape.
#11
Posted 12 August 2007 - 02:51 PM
1. Blacking/Striping a tape gives continuous timecode and is essential for any shoot.
2. Mixing different brand tapes with different lubricants is bad for your video head.
3. Reusing tape is a bad idea and you should buy new tape everytime.
Timecode
DV tapes rerecords timecode once you rerecord over the existing material. So essentially it's new timecode anyhow. You may also run into problems mixing timecodes. You also double the workload by having to stripe each tape, not to mention the wear on the camera (which is really negligible). Why people advocate doing it is because back in the Beta days, you needed to get consistent timecode.
Why do you need to do it? Because when you review whatever you've shot, the tendency is to overshoot the clip on tape into timecodeless tape. And these people either don't use the END SEARCH function if available OR they didn't roll on for about 5-10 secs after, which gives you the buffer for previewing.
Another possible reason is Sony's own low power standby mode, whereby it stops spinning the drums and powers down the entire tape transport. Now I've never had this problem personally even with QUICK REC on. My timecode has always been pretty good.
Here are a few good habits to avoid timecode disruption:
- Roll about 3 seconds before and 5 seconds after shooting. So even if you try to review, it will have a buffer to protect from creeping into blank tape.
- Use the END SEARCH function on your camera if you have one after review. It'll save you lots of grief in capture.
- QUICK RECORD function: I've never had a problem but some have had it. So if you are not shooting subjects that need faster recording response... turn it off.
Over 10 years later and still it pops up, much like striping/blacking.
When Sony first came up with their DV tape, they used a wet lubricant whereas other manufacturers like Panasonic and TDK went with dry powder lubricant. They obviously didn't mix well together and caused much havoc. This was in 1996. In 1997, Sony and other manufacturers made sure their respective lubricants didn't mess each other up, essentially ending the problem.
Think about it. If the problem existed anymore, then Sony couldn't sell tapes to anyone who's used a drylube tape on their camera or vice versa, risking lawsuits. Do you think they'd live with that for 10 years?
Still it's cheaper to buy tape in bulk so if you have a preference for a brand for whatever reason, stay with it. But don't worry too much if you have to buy another brand in a fix. Just clean the tape head first with a tape cleaner of the same brand.
Reusing Tapes
If you black/stripe a tape, you're reusing a tape. For some who believe in this practice, they also say it's good as it tensions the tape to the camera and removes production flakes which usually occur in the first minute or so of a tape.
Sony has stated their tapes started showing irrecoverable dropouts and defects after 150 recordings. Adam Wilt has used a tape for record and playback for at least 300-500 cycles. Before TIVO, I used my mini-DV deck to record TV shows and have used those tapes hundreds of times with no problems. For most people, if the tape contains some good stuff that needs archiving, backing up to an old tape isn't a bad idea.
Manufacturers of tape want people to keep buying new tape, just like any other manufacturer. For the greener folks, there's plastic and energy waste to consider. For the professionals, $9 for a tape is cheap insurance. Still not every new tape is going to be error free. For underwater use, you're not going to shoot gems every time. So a backup copy on an older tape saves on tape storage space (I have over 400 tapes from shooting video since 95). I started reusing tapes (no more than 5 times) since 2005. I've bought 10 tapes since then.
So good habits to form with shooting is:
- Clean your tape head with a cleaner tape after 50 hours of shooting.
- Use ethynol alcohol to clean the tape head after 25 hours of use or before each trip. Oh and use a clean Q-tip

- Record colorbars for the first minute of the tape to remove manufacturing particles.
- Rewind the tape and remove from the camera before storing the camera away.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#12
Posted 12 August 2007 - 04:57 PM
Panasonic DVM 60 this end they work really well.
Have used $$ Sony DVCAM tapes...got dropouts.
Used $$$ HDV tapes, got dropouts.
So $5 Panasonics DVM 60's go in all the cameras now.
Keep to one brand and only use the tape once.
Share Your Underwater Videos www.hdvunderwater.com | www.flykam.com.au | www.reeftorainforest.com.au
#13
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:18 PM
Messes using the batch capture method though. I don't think it's much of a problem with us small time fry as we mostly suck in the whole tape or just grab the section we want.
Share Your Underwater Videos www.hdvunderwater.com | www.flykam.com.au | www.reeftorainforest.com.au
#14
Posted 12 August 2007 - 05:34 PM
Minidive- ha... I'm still a cheap bastard and will always look for ways to say a few $$... I'm the same way with flash cards for cameras. Can't stand paying the premium for Sandisk's latest/ greatest...
Wags- that's good to hear... The shops around here only seem to be carrying Sony HDV tapes at around USD12-13 a pop and those Panasonic DVM 60's which go for just USD$3. Definitely makes economic sense for you guys doing dailies.
Oh well, watch for a post from me later this month crying about lost footage to dropouts on cheap tapes
Edited by pakman, 12 August 2007 - 05:39 PM.
Sony HC7 & Gates Housing
My diving photos / My diving videos
#15
Posted 13 August 2007 - 01:01 AM
Now I'm a bit confused as the Sony Asia website (link above) calls this "premium grade mini DV tape" but the labeling has no mention of "premium" like the US version. Sony USA site doesn't show this DVM60R but do show the "premium" DVM60PR with the blue packaging which clearly say "premium" on the packaging...
Are these the same?
DVC Premium on Sony USA site
and then the Sony Aussie site has a DVM60EX (Excellence Grade miniDV tape)...
Sony HC7 & Gates Housing
My diving photos / My diving videos
#16
Posted 13 August 2007 - 02:46 PM
OK, went out and bought 12 Sony DV60 tapes in red packaging (DVM60R).
The R in the number stands for Reject
Edited by Mini Dive, 13 August 2007 - 02:47 PM.
#17
Posted 13 August 2007 - 08:52 PM
The R in the number stands for Reject
I suspected that...
Sony HC7 & Gates Housing
My diving photos / My diving videos
#18
Posted 18 August 2007 - 11:04 PM
Last season I kept 6 tapes marked 1-6 and used the same tapes in the Z1 on all my liveaboard trips. I got timecode problems all over the shop because I had QUICK REC set on but I didn't get any dropouts that I remember.
Had trouble in the past with Panasonic and I never change brands now.
#19
Posted 19 August 2007 - 07:03 AM
Nick, as I already said, reusing tape isn't a bad option, especially for the work you are doing. If they are built to withstand 150 passes, 20-30 shouldn't be in the realm of ridiculous.When did you have troubles with the Pana tapes? I find the Pana AMQ and MQ tapes to be top notch and error free for HDV.
I've since transferred all work from the 1st generation tapes (pre 1998) with the anti-social lubricants to newer universally accepted lube tapes. Well all the work that warranted saving.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#20
Posted 19 August 2007 - 11:00 AM
