http://www.tariq.com/fujiacr.html
According to Tariq, he thinks that the Adobe converter treats the "pixels" as arrayed in the conventional bayer pattern - when in fact Fuji uses the SuperCCD which has close-packed hexagonal structure.
Daniel, is this true? Any comments?
Cheers
James
Fuji Converter or Adobe for RAW?
Started by james, Mar 27 2003 08:06 AM
1 reply to this topic
#1
james
-
- Super Mod
-
- 9966 posts
The Engineer
- Location:Houston TX
-
Posted 27 March 2003 - 08:06 AM
Canon 1DsMkIII - Seacam Housing
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#2
Craig Ruaux
-
- Member
- 788 posts
Great Hammerhead
- Gender:Male
- Location:Oregon, USA
-
Posted 27 March 2003 - 08:20 AM
Might have helped if they compared all three with the same picture...
Look at the direction the boy is looking in, and the shape of the waves. The jpeg image on the right is a different exposure/image.
While this may not have any bearing on the results of the comparison, it is slipshod and shows a lack of attention to detail, and thus makes one suspiscious of their attention to detail in other areas.
:freak:
Look at the direction the boy is looking in, and the shape of the waves. The jpeg image on the right is a different exposure/image.
While this may not have any bearing on the results of the comparison, it is slipshod and shows a lack of attention to detail, and thus makes one suspiscious of their attention to detail in other areas.
:freak:
Why would I take a perfectly good camera underwater??
D300, D200, D70, 12-24 f4 AFS DX, 60mm f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 AF-S VR, 105 f2.8 AF-S VR, Tokina Wunderlens.
Photo galleries @ Ruaux.net
D300, D200, D70, 12-24 f4 AFS DX, 60mm f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 AF-S VR, 105 f2.8 AF-S VR, Tokina Wunderlens.
Photo galleries @ Ruaux.net
