Gone DSLR with the Canon 10D at last!
#21
Posted 11 June 2003 - 05:24 AM
#22
Posted 11 June 2003 - 06:47 AM
It was very small and light and seemed well made. The one I got to try had a Jonah flat port.
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#23
Posted 11 June 2003 - 07:14 AM
By the way James... did you see the "Northwest Diver" piece by the Drafahls? It was _hilarious_. Rumor has it that there is a "Part Two."
#24
Posted 11 June 2003 - 07:15 AM
#25
Posted 11 June 2003 - 07:20 AM
You can mount pretty much any kind of dovetail base or ball on the Jonah handles it looks like.
HTH
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#26
Posted 11 June 2003 - 07:27 AM
Moving back on topic... I am curious about the types of batteries people are using in their 10Ds. Specifically, does any suggest avoiding any particular brand? Does anyone highly recommend any particular brand? Also, what about chargers?
Sorry for the general questions, but I will literally be buying everything at once and need to ensure I get it perfect because once I get to where I am going, there will be no second chances.
#27
Posted 11 June 2003 - 09:50 AM
What are you planning strobe wise? There are no housings for the 550EX except for the one from UK Germany and you need a 6 pin connector for that, all other regular UW strobes will only work manually.
Stu
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
#28
Posted 11 June 2003 - 10:47 AM
I assume that it is similar with the 10D only that you get a couple more pics out of one battery.
Simon
#29
Posted 11 June 2003 - 10:50 AM
I own a YS90DX and have been extremely happy with it, but have had good luck with Ikelite strobes in the past too, I would just need to buy the DS-125 at this point if I decide to go with that.
Since all strobes only work manually with the 10D, I will probably just stick with the ones I have. The word of the day is "semi-neutral" - right now, I am focused on resolving the housing issue and trying to understand which batteries and chargers to go with depending on which camera I get.
Two people have recommended the Fuji S2 over the Nikon D100, but the issue here is that I would still have to buy Nikon lenses regardless of which camera I bought. I read through the info about the S2 on DPreview and the two cameras look basically identical.
James... you shoot with the S2. Would you mind if I asked why you chose it over the D100?
#30
Posted 11 June 2003 - 10:57 AM
Also better resolution ~ somewhere around 9 megapixels (see the dpreview for the "lines"tests). The S2 is an amazing camera for what it costs.
I get about 350 shots off of a set of 1800 mah batteries. I bet I could get 400 or 450 w/ some new 2200's
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#31
Posted 11 June 2003 - 11:09 AM
From a purely logical perspective, I am thinking I need a charger with 8 slots, so I can fully recharge two complete sets of four (while using a second two sets of four). Or is that overkill?
Just thinking out loud here...
#32
Posted 11 June 2003 - 11:38 AM
www.nexusamerica.com
I have 2 DS125's now which don't take AA's but now that my GF has a DSLR camera (D60) it is still really nice to have.
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#33
Posted 11 June 2003 - 11:49 AM
I dont want to have my charger catching on fire when I am 400 miles from shore.
#34
Posted 11 June 2003 - 12:31 PM
Take the GP powerbank with GP rechargable batteries. It's the only reliable solution I know from trying that really charges 4 batties within 60 minutes. It's awesome! We use it for all regular bats. For the Canon 10D you should buy a second battery. They charge very fast (less than one hout, too).Anyone else have any recommendations about battery chargers? Specifically, manufacturers to avoid?
market overview of the essential equipment for digital uw photography
#35
Posted 11 June 2003 - 03:22 PM
Also recommend the Ansmann batteries...
Contact Woody Mayhew at www.nexusamerica.com he's in Dallas as well.
Stu
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
#36
Posted 11 June 2003 - 03:43 PM
Woody is actually in DUPS (Dallas Underwater Photographic Society) with me and we have been talking quite a bit the past two weeks. He _loves_ his D100 but also understands my dilemna: Do I say a prayer (and chew my fingernails) and hope a housing for the 10D is available by August or do I bite the bullet and get the S2 or the D100 and get a more readily available housing, purchasing an additional set of lenses along the way?
I sure do love my Canon lenses... especially the macro lenses.
Decisions, decisions...
Thanks for the suggestions on chargers.
#37
Posted 12 June 2003 - 10:51 AM
The 10D does have faster, better AF, but underwater if you're using the 50 macro, the motors on that lens are slow enough that you won't notice the lack of AF speed on the D60, with wide angle like the 16-35L, it's not really precision focus you're looking for anyway...compared to macro.
My point is, why get a new system where you not only need a new body, but new glass as well...Nikons work in reverse for us used to Canon, the lenses mount in reverse, the functionality is different (not better or worse, just different) This is not something I'd look forward to using underwater, it would get confusing...IMHO.
Stu
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
#38
Posted 12 June 2003 - 11:19 AM
The Canon 10D has a hotshoe mounted flash (the 550EX) that someone built an underwater housing for. At this time, this is apparently the only "strobe" that will allow a 10D to fire using TTL.
Is it just me, or does it seem like there is no way in Hades that this flash would be strong enough to shoot anything past a few feet? And even if you were shooting macro, it seems like you would be pretty limited to what you could do with it. And what would you mount it to - you couldn't stick it on the top of the housing because the shadows would look too harsh.
What I was planning to do was to shoot dual strobes, setting one manually and using one for my primary light and then using the other as a slave at a significantly reduced power setting for fill light.
Is anyone here planning on using the 550EX underwater? If so, would you enlighten me as to what advantage you see by doing so?
I dont want to stick with the "old" way of doing things just because ... but I dont see how this flash would really work effectively underwater for anything other than macro shots. (And even with that, I see issues.)
#39
Posted 12 June 2003 - 11:32 AM
Excellent question Stu - why would I want to use Nikon when I am used to Canon? The answer is simple: I don't.I'm curious though, you've got Canon lenses already, so why get a D100 or S2? I'd get the D60 and the Subal housing for it.
My point is, why get a new system where you not only need a new body, but new glass as well... This is not something I'd look forward to using underwater, it would get confusing...IMHO.
Stu
The problem is this: I could get ahold of the D60 and a housing fairly easily because I know someone who put together a system last winter then never had a chance to even use it. However, if I bought his system (which I still consider as an option), then I would still be wishing I had the 10D simply because it is a better camera.
Unfortunately, the housings for the 10D may not be available by the timeframe I am working under (although I may have that resolved now) - I have to have the housing no later than say... early- to mid-August.
Since I am determined to bring a DSLR on this trip, I am very loosely considering buying the Nikon D100 or the Fuji S2 simply because housings are readily available for both cameras. The downside is that this would require me to buy Nikon lenses (at least two), and as you said, this would be a huge change for me.
Would it be intolerable? No... probably not. The good part is that once you get underwater, I would simply need to know how to navigate the camera. The bad part is that I would have to maintain an entirely separate set of lenses for underwater use. The good part about that (maybe?) is that this means any damage done to the lenses I am using underwater would not impact top-side photography since I would continue using my Canon lenses for that.
Basically, switching to Nikon lenses (and the D100 or S2) is an absolute last resort. A very last resort.
And I think you are right... I do think it could get confusing.
I can already envision me underwater... going
#40
Posted 13 June 2003 - 11:43 AM
Though a good friend only shoots with 1 strobe over the port for macro and he has stunning shots....
My 2 cents...good luck on what you end up with....
stu
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
