Doesn't matter how the audio stands up. I doubt any of the housing manufacturers will set up a hydrophone for the camera. Let it be known that the ones that do will get my recommendation for forward thinking(provided they ALSO have access to all the other functions including liveview for video
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
#121
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:14 AM
Doesn't matter how the audio stands up. I doubt any of the housing manufacturers will set up a hydrophone for the camera. Let it be known that the ones that do will get my recommendation for forward thinking(provided they ALSO have access to all the other functions including liveview for video
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#122
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:36 AM
You replace a camera when it's just out for repair? The economy needs you!
Doesn't matter how the audio stands up. I doubt any of the housing manufacturers will set up a hydrophone for the camera. Let it be known that the ones that do will get my recommendation for forward thinking(provided they ALSO have access to all the other functions including liveview for video
). The audio is PCM 44k 16bit stereo.
Really thinking more above water use for the time being and was curious how the audio help up from how the camera records it. I know it is not XLR inputs, but was figuring the video and sound has to be better than the HC-3 (or equal). Though financially the HC-3 and the 50D/40D does make a lot more sense....
#123
Posted 10 January 2009 - 10:42 AM
I don't think the 5DII will is much of a substitute for most camcorders for general-purpose video. The fact that it won't AF while shooting video actually makes its usefulness quite limited, as far as I see it, limited to a handful of lenses, and/or situations where the distance of subjects changes relatively little during a clip.
www.UnderwaterReflections.com
Canon 5DMkII in Aquatica, 1DsMkII in Seacam, G9 in OEM...Inon Z240's...too many lenses
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damned fool about it." WC Fields
#124
Posted 10 January 2009 - 11:05 AM
I went down to our camera store ready to buy a D90. After playing with it a little, that factor alone made me hold off till the next generation. I'm still really keen on the concept, but I don't think either the Canon or the Nikon implementation is where this needs to be...... yet.Drew (RealDrew, not "just" Drew),
I don't think the 5DII will is much of a substitute for most camcorders for general-purpose video. The fact that it won't AF while shooting video actually makes its usefulness quite limited, as far as I see it, limited to a handful of lenses, and/or situations where the distance of subjects changes relatively little during a clip.
#125
Posted 10 January 2009 - 11:09 AM
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#126
Posted 10 January 2009 - 01:48 PM
Thanks
Guess I will get a sense if my camera comes back in time, can always order something as needed. My credit card stopped burning a hole right now...sort of
I liked the old rangefinder cameras...
#127
Posted 10 January 2009 - 02:01 PM
My Website
#128
Posted 10 January 2009 - 04:06 PM
Couldn't you get a lot of mileage out of the whole "1/2 the hyperfocal distance" thing when shooting video with something like a 10-17 fisheye?
There has been a couple of mentions of cropped sensor lenses in the last few posts... don't forget the 5dii is full frame.
Canon EOS5Dmkii + EOS7D + Aquatica | Megadome | Minidome100 | AQUAVIEW 45 | Inon Z240 | Inon LE550w
#129
Posted 10 January 2009 - 06:02 PM
Couldn't you get a lot of mileage out of the whole "1/2 the hyperfocal distance" thing when shooting video with something like a 10-17 fisheye?
Is there a quick way of estimating (not with a calculator, but in your head on the fly) hyperfocal distance? That would certainly come in handy with this camera!
www.UnderwaterReflections.com
Canon 5DMkII in Aquatica, 1DsMkII in Seacam, G9 in OEM...Inon Z240's...too many lenses
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damned fool about it." WC Fields
#130
Posted 10 January 2009 - 06:38 PM
Is there a quick way of estimating (not with a calculator, but in your head on the fly) hyperfocal distance? That would certainly come in handy with this camera!
There is a formula ... but I found this just poking around ...
http://www.nikonians...yperfocal2.html
Edited by jeremypayne, 10 January 2009 - 06:39 PM.
My Website
#131
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:13 PM
Is there a quick way of estimating (not with a calculator, but in your head on the fly) hyperfocal distance? That would certainly come in handy with this camera!
I had a windows shareware program that you could enter a focal length and a format (and even your preferred circle of confusion) into and it would produce the components of a "wheel" that you could print out, laminate and assemble for a particular lens. I used it in the field for my large format work. It was years ago and the machine I had it on is long gone. Can't find it on the web, but found the following alternative:
If you go to this page you can download a calculator wheel that you can cut out and assemble. Covers full frame (35mm) lenses and he has one for medium format too.
While not "in your head", it is more convenient than the online calculators, unless of course you have a waterproof iphone ...
Edited by photovan, 10 January 2009 - 07:15 PM.
Canon EOS5Dmkii + EOS7D + Aquatica | Megadome | Minidome100 | AQUAVIEW 45 | Inon Z240 | Inon LE550w
#132
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:50 PM
There is a formula ... but I found this just poking around ...
http://www.nikonians...yperfocal2.html
That's great, but since I occasionally use my camera when I don't have internet access
Here's a related observation. Since getting a wide DoF seems to require both a fairly wide lens and a small aperture, I can envision lower light situations requiring (or at least benefiting from) higher ISO when shooting video with the 5DII. How much will its video suffer from higher (e.g., 1600) ISO settings? Same as stills?
www.UnderwaterReflections.com
Canon 5DMkII in Aquatica, 1DsMkII in Seacam, G9 in OEM...Inon Z240's...too many lenses
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damned fool about it." WC Fields
#133
Posted 10 January 2009 - 08:31 PM
Remember underwater you focus on the virtual image.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#134
Posted 10 January 2009 - 09:30 PM
.... How much will its video suffer from higher (e.g., 1600) ISO settings? ....
From what I've seen of my 5dmkii, 1080p video seems a lot more forgiving on a big flatscreen than a pixel-peeped 22MP still. The high iso performance of the video seems to work just fine in what I've shot so far.
Edited by photovan, 10 January 2009 - 09:30 PM.
Canon EOS5Dmkii + EOS7D + Aquatica | Megadome | Minidome100 | AQUAVIEW 45 | Inon Z240 | Inon LE550w
#135
Posted 03 February 2009 - 06:45 AM
http://www.neutralda...eos-5d-mark-ii/
Earlier I responded to Craig about why I am a Nikon 'fanboy' due to previous quality issues with Canon and other brands.
#136
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:03 AM
I've been using my 5DII extensively for about a week now and it has worked very well. No complaints at all. I'll be taking my camera offshore next week into a salty environment so we'll see.
If I remember correctly, Nikon has had a few problems in the past as well (BGLOD for example) so we need to just be aware of potential problems w/ the tight delivery schedules the camera companies are working to.
Regards,
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#137
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:10 AM
Stu
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
#138
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:14 AM
Hi Jeff,
I've been using my 5DII extensively for about a week now and it has worked very well. No complaints at all. I'll be taking my camera offshore next week into a salty environment so we'll see.
If I remember correctly, Nikon has had a few problems in the past as well (BGLOD for example) so we need to just be aware of potential problems w/ the tight delivery schedules the camera companies are working to.
Regards,
James
It would appear that this is a weather sealing related issue, as it appears to be humidity related rather than temperature related.. At least in their mid-range, prosumer cameras, Nikon seems to scimp a little less than Canon in this area.
Sure all cameras / products will have issues, I do think there are overall quality issues between brands, at least that has been my experience.
J.D. Power surveys seem to support this as well.
http://www.jdpower.c...aspx?ID=2008038
Edited by loftus, 03 February 2009 - 08:20 AM.
#139
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:15 AM
#140
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:26 AM
Earlier I responded to Craig about why I am a Nikon 'fanboy' due to previous quality issues with Canon and other brands.
Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (waiting for housing).
