You find your images in the weirdest places.
#1
Posted 13 February 2009 - 12:02 AM
website | tripreports/journal | facebook | wetpixel map | twitter
#2
Posted 13 February 2009 - 01:12 AM
Once a month or so I check my referrer logs to see anything weird. Just found a picture of mine linked from a tropical diseases medical centre in their solomon islands vaccination section. Im soo tempted to replace the image with something less appriopriate. They're asking for it!
If you're gonna steal an image, have the courtesy to properly steal it right?
Replacing it with a text saying, "I'm cheap - so I steal other peoples photos" might be a proper response.
Wreckphotography from the cold north
#3
Posted 13 February 2009 - 02:05 AM
Replacing it with a text saying, "I'm cheap - so I steal other peoples photos" might be a proper response.
But seriously Cor, You should defenetly give them a little lesson!!!
www.karelbernard.com
Karel Bernard
Canon G9 in Ikelite Housing; SubStrobe DS-160
WA lens Ikelite W-20; Inon UCL-165 M67 Close-up Lenses
#4
Posted 13 February 2009 - 03:04 AM
That must be a very cheap webmaster then, he deserves a lesson!
#5
Posted 13 February 2009 - 08:26 AM
Once a month or so I check my referrer logs to see anything weird. Just found a picture of mine linked from a tropical diseases medical centre in their solomon islands vaccination section. Im soo tempted to replace the image with something less appriopriate. They're asking for it!
If you're gonna steal an image, have the courtesy to properly steal it right?
Having had images stoeln, I am not sure if the courtesy makes it that much better
#6
Posted 17 March 2009 - 02:33 PM
#7
Posted 17 March 2009 - 07:04 PM
If you aren't familiar with spongmonkeys, take a look at this video.
Not porn, but I found it amusing..
#8
Posted 18 March 2009 - 06:00 AM
Replace it with porn. They will stop using your photos.
I know the post was made in jest and it did sound good at first, but it's not the right answer.
Unless you shoot the porn yourself, then you would just be compounding the situation by using someone else's photograph without permission (even if it was porn) to replace your photograph which was used without your permission.
Doesn't seem very ethical in my mind, and would certainly make it harder for you to be taken seriously when pleading copyright infringement.
Nikon D2x, D7000, Aquatica D2x, AD7000, SunStrobe 200 x2, Inon Z240 x2, TLC Arms
#9
Posted 18 March 2009 - 04:11 PM
If you aren't familiar with spongmonkeys, take a look at this video.
Not porn, but I found it amusing..
Quiznos in Canada does not use the Sponge Monkeys but now, thanks to mandarinfish, I'm obsessed with them. Hover Bacon ROCKS!!!
Thanks for the laugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!
********************************************************
Canon S2 IS, Ikelite 6140.02, Inon UWL-100 WA Lens & Ikelite DS-125
www.pbase.com/kiml
#10
Posted 18 March 2009 - 08:47 PM
It definitely gave me a break from searching for latin names for obscure Lembeh crabs. I almost peed myself laughing.If you aren't familiar with spongmonkeys, take a look at this video.
Cheers,
Marli
www.marliwakeling.com
Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together. ~Carl Zwanzig
#11
Posted 06 May 2009 - 06:19 PM
Cheers,
Marli
aka Spongmonkey fan, "cause they're CANADIAN, and cool. "
Edited by scubamarli, 06 May 2009 - 06:25 PM.
www.marliwakeling.com
Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together. ~Carl Zwanzig
#12
Posted 14 July 2009 - 07:19 PM
I for example enable photos to be displayed from my web server on this site and a few other forums.
#13
Posted 17 July 2009 - 12:03 AM
Sort of caveat emptor, I guess...
If your image is capable of being linked, then that's tantamount to giving tacit permission for it to be used, isn't it?
In my other life, if you let me stick a needle into your arm, then you have given consent, even tho' it's not in writing...
Tim
#14
Posted 17 July 2009 - 12:09 AM
website | tripreports/journal | facebook | wetpixel map | twitter
#15
Posted 23 July 2009 - 10:59 PM
If your server is running Apache, put something like this in your .htaccess file:It is possible to configure the server with a .htaccess file so only authorized web sites can display your work. That way you don't have your bandwidth stolen as well.
I for example enable photos to be displayed from my web server on this site and a few other forums.
Options +FollowSymlinks +SymlinksIfOwnerMatch
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} .
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?bubblevision\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?wetpixel\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?bing\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?google\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://images\.google\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://video\.google\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://.*\.search\.yahoo\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://web\.ask\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://search\.lycos\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/images/hotlink\.gif$
RewriteRule \.(jpe?g|gif|png|ico|css|js|swf|mp4|wmv|mpg|avi|flv|php)$ /images/hotlink.gif [L]This allows the sites in that list to hotlink your files, but other sites will see your hotlink.gif file instead. In my case that looks like this:

The last line in the code lists the types of file that you want to prevent hotlinking for.
I can't remember what the first line does but it doesn't seem to do any harm.
There is a good apache forum on webmasterworld.com if you run into trouble with this stuff.
#16
Posted 03 September 2009 - 03:27 AM
If your image is capable of being linked, then that's tantamount to giving tacit permission for it to be used, isn't it?
In my other life, if you let me stick a needle into your arm, then you have given consent, even tho' it's not in writing...
No. Using an image requires permission. Just cos its easier to steal than seek permission does not absolve the thief from their responsibilities.
Before the needle goes in my arm, you would have asked and verbal "yes - hurt me" would be sufficient for you to stick it in. I am assuming I'm conscious and its not a matter of life and death......
This is copyright infringement. I would contact the infringer. Firstly to recover damages and secondly to license the ongoing use.
www.simonbrownimages.com
