travel restrictions
#1
Posted 27 December 2009 - 12:38 AM
FYI,
website | tripreports/journal | facebook | wetpixel map | twitter
#2
Posted 27 December 2009 - 10:38 AM
Regards,
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#3
Posted 27 December 2009 - 10:56 AM
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#4
Posted 27 December 2009 - 11:22 AM
#5
Posted 27 December 2009 - 11:24 AM
website | tripreports/journal | facebook | wetpixel map | twitter
#6
Posted 27 December 2009 - 11:40 AM
Phil
Canon 7D, Subal, dual Inon Z240's, Tokina 10-17, Canon 60mm and 100mm
"Hey Dean! How do you work this crazy thing?!" Jerry Lewis
#7
Posted 27 December 2009 - 12:13 PM
#8
Posted 27 December 2009 - 01:56 PM
Travel Advisory
New International Security Directive
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has issued a new security directive affecting flights departing international locations arriving in the United States. For Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air passengers this affects flights coming from Canada or Mexico into the United States.
Passengers traveling from Canada or Mexico should arrive at the airport a minimum of 2 hours before departure in order to help with the additional security measures.
* Additional Searches: All passengers flying into the United States will be searched at the departure gate, in addition to normal screening at security checkpoints.
* Carry-on Luggage: From Canada or Mexico, carry-on luggage will also be searched at the departure gate. Transport Canada has limited the number of carry-on luggage to one (1) through the security checkpoint for passengers traveling from Canada to the United States. To minimize boarding delays, passengers are encouraged to check all their luggage. Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air will waive baggage fees for items checked as baggage that the passenger otherwise would have taken aboard as carry-on baggage from Canada or Mexico.
* Additional Inflight Security: Added security measures while on the international flights are also being put into effect.
Thomas C. Kline, Jr., Ph. D.
Oceanography & Limnology
Canon Eos-1Ds MkII and Nikon D1X, D2X, D2H cameras. Lens focal lengths ranging from 8 to 180mm for UW use. Seacam housings and remote control gear. Seacam 150D and 250D, Sea&Sea YS250, and Inon Z220 strobes.
www.flickr.com/photos/tomkline/
#9
Posted 27 December 2009 - 02:17 PM
Bob (who had rather fly than swim to Asia)
Carpe carp - Seize the carp
#10
Posted 27 December 2009 - 07:39 PM
Good luck if you're flying international for a while.
Cheers,
Steve
The Fin Foundation
My Images on Flikr
Canon7D & 40D, 60mm, 100mm, 17-40L, Tokina 10-17, Nauticam 7D, Sea & Sea MDX-40D YS-250's ULCS arms, Lightroom
#11
Posted 27 December 2009 - 09:30 PM
I wonder how many terrorists fly from Grand Cayman into the US?
Ellen
www.pbase.com/ornate_wrasse
#12
Posted 28 December 2009 - 02:47 AM
#13
Posted 28 December 2009 - 06:29 AM
Most all of them, especially the grandmothers and toddlers.I wonder how many terrorists fly from Grand Cayman into the US?
![]()
Ellen
It is not possible to search your way to 100% security. The current security strategy is ineffective. It can only become effective with complete body and baggage search, which is impractical. The most effective approach is people screening instead of property screening. But people screening isn't, nor can it be effective in its current form.
#14
Posted 28 December 2009 - 07:38 AM
Mike
#15
Posted 28 December 2009 - 01:00 PM
I think BackScatter X-Rays are already in TSA hands. But I doubt they'll get approval for machines powerful enough to see my endoskeletal image as I pass security. Think of all the cancer lawsuits!
Then again if they have to scan every single passenger with a MMW or X-ray body scan, then I shudder to think of how long it'll take to board an A380 plane!
These "measures" are mostly done to placate and calm the public. Taking away potty privileges, blankets and pillows and inflight entertainment in the last hour of flight is not about effectiveness. There will never be a 100% effective plan. Do people really think any measures from profiling to body scans will remove all risk? Depending on which measurements you use, flying is still safer than driving. Yet we all go on the highway like it's back in the womb safe. There are risks involved in EVERYTHING we do. Every system that involves having humans work it is inherently flawed. Umar got through despite being on a watch list because of human error. The security system works well enough. People just have to accept there are risks involved in living.
Anyhow, with emissions cutting being all the rage, perhaps flying less is a good thing
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#16
Posted 28 December 2009 - 02:32 PM
I live in the Kansas CIty area. You did not say you were coming so I failed to bake a cake. Of course, I am in Cleveland now visiting relatives. Ships passing in the night...I flew today from Tucson through Denver to Kansa City. I was expecting a painful security hassle. Instead we zoomed through. They even informed me that there is no longer any need to keep your boarding pass available when you go through the metal detector. The initial check when you show your ID is enough. 30 minutes from the house to the gate. I wouldn't try that if I was coming in from Amsterdam.
Good luck if you're flying international for a while.
Cheers,
Steve
If you are still in the KC area on 12/31 or later, I could buy you a blvd beer...
Dave
www.shiningseastudio.com
#17
Posted 29 December 2009 - 07:44 AM
founder of Reef Photo & Video
manufacturer of Zen Domes
distributor of Nauticam in the Americas
n2theblue at reefphoto.com
#18
Posted 29 December 2009 - 08:00 AM
In a few months it'll all calm down and then it'll get back to semi-normalcy I hope!
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#19
Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:29 AM
Yesterday Delta/Northwest was only allowing purses to be carried on board flights into the US from Canada, claiming a Transport Canada restriction. No amount of protesting could get my laptop bag classified as a man purse, so I had to check it. United at the same airport was allowing 1 carry on per person. Delta allowed you to carry on laptops by themselves, just no bags to speed security screening. No electronics were permitted to be used during the entire flight.
what about camera bags?
(This just makes the people stealing all checked luggage have a bigger pool of nice items to steal.)
#20
Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:11 PM
Yesterday Delta/Northwest was only allowing purses to be carried on board flights into the US from Canada, claiming a Transport Canada restriction. No amount of protesting could get my laptop bag classified as a man purse, so I had to check it. United at the same airport was allowing 1 carry on per person. Delta allowed you to carry on laptops by themselves, just no bags to speed security screening. No electronics were permitted to be used during the entire flight.
Ryan,
How do you check a laptop without it getting trashed? Sounds like I need to prepare myself to check in my photo equip carry-on just in case this thing turns uglier. Do you have any bag recommendations or should I just pack a Pelican Case and hope to hell I have equipment to shoot with when I get to my destination?
Thanks!
Mike
