Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

New Tokina 16-28mm f2.8 announced


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Ferg42

Ferg42

    Eagle Ray

  • Industry
  • PipPipPip
  • 374 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Sussex, UK

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:50 AM

New wide angle lens announced here:

http://www.dpreview....ina16282pt8.asp

Apparently aimed at full-frame slrs, but not sure if it's the long-awaited full-frame fisheye zoom (I guess probably not)- no further details available.
EOS 7D, Nauticam housing, EOS 5D II, Ikelite, Inon z240, Inon D180, Tok 10-17, 15 FE, 17-40, 105 Macro
Sony HC7, Gates Housing
Visit My Website

#2 Alex_Mustard

Alex_Mustard

    The Doctor

  • Super Mod
  • 8376 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:58 AM

Good find Fergus.

The focal length is about right for a fisheye (and very similar to the old Pentax 17-28mm FF fisheye zoom, which I think was made by Tokina). But sadly that hood is too long for a fisheye! It is a rectilinear.

How I would love to be wrong, though!

Alex

Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Nikon D7100 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (Nauticam housing).


#3 Pedro

Pedro

    Damselfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 19 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 04:54 AM

Unfortunatelly, as Alex said, for the aspect is a rectilinear lens. The old Pentax fisheye zoom (made in Tokina) was a 17-28 mm f:3,5-4,5. We hope to arrive, as son as possible, one new fisheye zoom made in Tokina for the full frame format.

#4 Walt Stearns

Walt Stearns

    Eagle Ray

  • Industry
  • PipPipPip
  • 305 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Palm Beach, Florida
  • Interests:Diving and underwater photography of course with a little rebreathers, cave diving, marine science and natural history thrown in.

Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:22 AM

We, or any body else have no clue what exactly this lens will be fisheye or rectilinear
At the moment the only thing certain is that Tokina is making a Tokina SD 16-28mm F2.8 (IF) FX AT-X PRO with a focal length of 16 to 28mm for FX, price Unknown, availability unknown, fisheye or rectilinear not certain, only speculation as the lens that was shown at PMA was only mock up.

http://gadgets.softp...Rs-8120-01.html

http://gadgets.softp...Rs-8120-01.html

Surprising nothing on either Nikon Rumors - http://nikonrumors.com or Photo Rumors - http://photorumors.com except something about a new 14mm from Samyang.

We will just have to wait and see.

Damm! I hate waiting

#5 Ryan

Ryan

    Great White

  • Industry
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Lauderdale, FL

Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:46 AM

The mockups integral shade is definitely not cut for a fisheye field of view.

My Nikon 16-35 /4 VR was delivered yesterday, but I'd be interested in how these compare, and am glad to see more full frame rectilinear lenses with modern designs.

founder of Reef Photo & Video
manufacturer of Zen Domes

distributor of Nauticam in the Americas

 

n2theblue at reefphoto.com


#6 RedSeaDiver

RedSeaDiver

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 238 posts
  • Location:Australia

Posted 24 February 2010 - 05:45 PM

On the labelling on the lens shown there is no mention of Fisheye, whereas on all other Tokina lenses it says fisheye there so that would tend to support the likelihood that it is a rectilinear lens - this is also supported by the lens hood as Alex pointed out.
Red Sea Dreaming....

Canon 7D, Tokina 10-17, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 17-70, Canon 100mm macro, Kenko 1.4x Teleconverter, Nauticam housing when it arrives, 2x Inon Z240 strobes, Lowepro Vertex 300 AW backpack.

#7 Drew

Drew

    The Controller

  • Video Expert
  • 10639 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:GPS is not reliable in South East Asian seas

Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:19 PM

Rectilinear is better than fisheye! :(

Drew
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."

"I was born not knowing, and have only had a little time to change that here and there.


#8 segal3

segal3

    Powerful Sea Gull

  • Admin
  • 1739 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 27 February 2010 - 11:44 AM

Rectilinear is better than fisheye! :)

On this, I agree ;).
Matt Segal - carbonos scuba