Posted 06 March 2010 - 03:58 PM
I saw the last results of the contest "Our World Underwater 2010" and was very intrigued by the creative lighting used by Keri Wilk giving fantastic, original results.
See links below
Do you have any idea how he managed that kind of lighting?
1) Used a full frame camera and a torch with a small beam at high ISO
2) Used a Strobe and fitted a funnel to the desired beam
3) others ...
Marine Biologist, Pearl Farmer, and photographer at heart...
My Blog: www.dstassen.com
My equipment: Canon 7D, Nauticam ND7, Nauticam 180 degree viewfinder, lenses (canon) 100 mm, 60 mm, 10-22 mm. Twin Inon Z240 strobes, 3 x Sea&Sea YS110 alpha.
Posted 14 March 2010 - 05:39 AM
Nothing wrong with that, just don't send it into any National Geographic or photojournalism contests/publications or they will crusify you (rightfully) for changing the truth and meaning of the image. Anyway for illustrative and creative purposes this does not count.
He is a good photographer and the shots are great. I believe they would still be good without all the burning.
Edited by Adventure4ever.com, 14 March 2010 - 05:46 AM.
Posted 14 March 2010 - 07:00 AM
Blog and Photo Archive/Portfolio Site www.mikeveitchblog.com
Learn underwater photography in Indonesia or Join me on a trip www.underwatertribe.com
Posted 14 March 2010 - 07:29 AM
I think the 'creative' lighting was made in Photoshop by burning out the dark parts into the extreme.
To add to what Mike said, they were in Macro Traditional and Super Macro Traditional catagories which are more limited in what type of changes can be made to the images to
. The "Traditional" divisions allow for the adjustment of brightness, contrast, color, and sharpness only. Cropping, cloning, and other digital manipulation is not allowed in this category.
So it would seem that burning could (would?) run afoul of the rules and the judges would have caught it. Some pretty keen eyes on the panel and in fact a couple of years back no one in Super Macro won because of what the judges saw in terms of potential conflicts with the rules, so they will enforce them. Keri is extremely talented and I would bet most contests and National Geo would feel the same when seeing Keri's shots.
Now if Keri could be banned from contests from now on to give us mere mortals a chance, that would be good
Posted 14 March 2010 - 08:08 AM
I imagine that you don't have time to do that on the standard 50 minute regulated tourist dive.
I've been on a dive trip with Ernie Brooks. Famed B&W UW photographer. He was burning and dogging UW photos before I was born. You show him a photo and he starts immediately suggesting where you should burn it.
Life is a beach and then you dive.
Posted 15 March 2010 - 09:55 PM
Posted 16 March 2010 - 12:33 AM
In Our World Underwater the judges always check the original RAW files of all finalists in the traditional categories so any images that have been modified would have been caught.
website | tripreports/journal | facebook | wetpixel map | twitter
Posted 16 March 2010 - 07:15 AM
Keri hinted at what he does with snoots Here! and the images he is getting using the superacro techniques he's pioneered along with his prototype snoots.
"I think the 'creative' lighting was made in Photoshop by burning out the dark parts into the extreme"
Frits, you were absolutely miles off the mark.
There's no dignity in diving. Especially as you get older.
Nikon D800 Subal ND800 housing Nikkor 16-35, 60, 105 and a Sigma 15 FE. Inon Z240's. ULCS arms.
Posted 16 March 2010 - 08:26 AM
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
"I was born not knowing, and have only had a little time to change that here and there.
Posted 16 March 2010 - 09:43 AM
Olympus E-520, TLC arms, Inon Z-240s, 50mm, 14-42mm woody's diopter
Posted 16 March 2010 - 04:09 PM
When I was at Alex Mustard's workshop in Grand Cayman in January, he offered all of the participants in the workshop the chance to work with snoots. He did state, though, that everyone who tried it at his last workshop gave up on it pretty quickly as it was too difficult to get good results. I didn't even try it, based on what Alex told us. Based on that, Keri must have had difficulties when he tried it initially, but then practiced and practiced until he got the shots he wanted. That rates at least 10 in my book for working at a task in underwater photography until it's perfected. Bravo for Keri!
Posted 16 March 2010 - 07:16 PM
Canon 5D Mk III, 7D & 40D, 60mm, 100mm, 17-40L, Tokina 10-17, Nauticam 7D, Sea & Sea MDX-40D YS-250's ULCS arms, Lightroom
Posted 17 March 2010 - 04:38 AM
I shot some snoot shots in December and what he did with two is very difficult and frustrating in implementation.
I am quite confident Keri is and always has been within the rules of competitions. Congrats again Keri.
all photographs posted © Todd C Mintz