http://www.ikonoskop.com/a-cam3d/
Ikonoskop A-CAM IIId, a 3D HD Raw format camera
#1
Posted 20 April 2010 - 05:21 PM
http://www.ikonoskop.com/a-cam3d/
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#2
Posted 20 April 2010 - 06:20 PM
Now what kind of dome is needed?
A big one
Edited by jonny shaw, 20 April 2010 - 06:21 PM.
www.ginclearfilm.com
www.facebook.com/ginclearfilm
GATES DEEP EPIC Based in Sydney
#3
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:12 PM
Canon EOS5Dmkii + EOS7D + Aquatica | Megadome | Minidome100 | AQUAVIEW 45 | Inon Z240 | Inon LE550w
#4
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:41 PM
Ikonoskop quiet released a custom built 3D camera based on their yet to be released A-CAM dII RAW HD camera. This 3D version can be custom ordered and will sport 2 of the S16 CCD sensors and record separate files in DNG,
Wow. Just when we get semi-comfortable with the idea technology keeps going and things change, there always seems to be more....
#5
Posted 21 April 2010 - 05:31 AM
have these 3D cameras got a way of adjusting for parallax at different shooting distances? Just that the little Fuji 3D camera I'm testing does...
I'm sure the issue of optics will complicate underwater use. Look at the IMAX 3D cameras... how big are those domes!
With these smaller cameras, the domes would have to be almost madonna bustier like but then the sensor distance of 90mm doesn't make it easy. I'll leave it to the real engineers to figure it out. I'll just bitch about the lack of sharpness and become unpopular with them until they get it right.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#6
Posted 21 April 2010 - 05:37 AM
Canon EOS5Dmkii + EOS7D + Aquatica | Megadome | Minidome100 | AQUAVIEW 45 | Inon Z240 | Inon LE550w
#7
Posted 21 April 2010 - 10:22 AM
The logistics of that will be sizeable.
Steve
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#8
Posted 10 May 2010 - 08:08 AM
They don't use domes in IMAX 3D because the virtual image screws up the 3D effect on the big screen. I had a long conversation with Howard about this -- they tried it, but the effect was totally wrong in the theater (they used a dome that was nearly 3' in diameter, which added a few hundred pounds to the weight of the camera).I'm sure the issue of optics will complicate underwater use. Look at the IMAX 3D cameras... how big are those domes!
I'll bet you could get away with it for small screen presentation, but large screen 3D is not very forgiving.
#9
Posted 11 May 2010 - 12:00 AM
#10
Posted 11 May 2010 - 12:36 AM
Divergence is done in post in IMAX by moving the projectors apart, which pushes the image back in the window. This can't really be done for non-projection display, and has to be done in post, which means that you either have to crop in and adjust, lose part of the image on the side, or warp the image...
#11
Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:16 PM
3D on land is difficult enough...for underwater work it's a serious challenge. However, things are moving fast.
I recently saw the 55 inch Samsung LCD 3D panel using their active shutter glasses. Very impressive indeed.
Based on how my family and non-diving friends reacted so positively to the 3D underwater IMAX films, I think underwater videography in 3D will be particularly popular with audiences...an immersive experience, so to speak.
