Looks like the one of the best point and shoots is about to get better, but with a slight tweak to the case....will it still fit into the S90 cases or will we have to wait for new ones
http://www.dpreview....owershots95.asp
And to top it all
Started by Mooseman1007, Aug 19 2010 04:47 AM
4 replies to this topic
#2
crawdad
-
- Member
- 151 posts
Wolf Eel
Posted 19 August 2010 - 07:37 AM
Looks like the one of the best point and shoots is about to get better, but with a slight tweak to the case....will it still fit into the S90 cases or will we have to wait for new ones
http://www.dpreview....owershots95.asp
Seems like the major improvement is the addition of the HD which is of no value to me. As to the drop-in fit, no, I doubt it. The case has been modified to incorporate stereo and I notice on the Canon USA site that they list the new housing as the DC-38 vs the DC-35 for the S90.
I will be purchasing a spare S90 as soon as possible now.
Canon S90, FIX90, dual Inon D2000 strobes, Inon UCL165AD, Inon UFL165AD, Inon UWL100 plus dome, Fisheye UWL-04, DIY tray, adapter
Swim down, swim around, swim back up.
http://www.uwphotogr...guide.com/forum
Swim down, swim around, swim back up.
http://www.uwphotogr...guide.com/forum
#3
Alex_Mustard
-
- Super Mod
-
- 8288 posts
The Doctor
- Gender:Male
- Location:La Maddalena
-
Posted 19 August 2010 - 08:33 AM
That's great news. The only weakness I felt the S90 had was a lack of HD video. It is a great little camera (although not cheap).
Alex
Alex
Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (waiting for housing).
#4
leepix
-
- Member
- 95 posts
Moray Eel
- Gender:Male
- Location:JAX FLA
- Interests:Ships, boats and diving
-
Posted 24 August 2010 - 01:42 PM
Ken Rockwell reports that the S95 is a little smaller in size. except thickness. Maybe it will still in fit current Fisheye housing?
he posted this data:
3.93 x 2.30 x 1.16 in. (99.8 x 58.4 x 29.5mm), rated.
The S90 was rated at 3.94 x 2.30 x 1.22 inches (100.0 x 58.4 x 30.9mm).
he posted this data:
3.93 x 2.30 x 1.16 in. (99.8 x 58.4 x 29.5mm), rated.
The S90 was rated at 3.94 x 2.30 x 1.22 inches (100.0 x 58.4 x 30.9mm).
#5
girelle
-
- Member
- 243 posts
Sting Ray
- Gender:Female
- Location:France
-
Posted 25 August 2010 - 02:08 AM
Ken Rockwell reports that the S95 is a little smaller in size. except thickness. Maybe it will still in fit current Fisheye housing?
he posted this data:
3.93 x 2.30 x 1.16 in. (99.8 x 58.4 x 29.5mm), rated.
The S90 was rated at 3.94 x 2.30 x 1.22 inches (100.0 x 58.4 x 30.9mm).
The S 95 will probably fit in the Fisheye housing , but the back buttons seems to be lower .
So I'm afraid it will not be possible to use the S 95 in the S90 housing .
I had the same problem between the Nikon D 80 and the Nikon D 90
Anyway the S 90 is a wonderfull camera and I never do vidéo ..So ..
Better like Crawdad buy another S 90 before it become impossible to find one .
