http://blogs.suntime.../01/post_4.html
Interesting article on why 3d won't ever be popular by top Hollywood editor
Started by scottleslie, Jan 31 2011 11:21 AM
4 replies to this topic
#1
scottleslie
-
- Member
- 102 posts
Wolf Eel
Posted 31 January 2011 - 11:21 AM
Nova Scotia, CANADA Bay of Fundy: A Natural Portrait, Wetland Birds of North America, Woodland Birds of North America, Seabirds of North America http://www.scottlesliephoto.com
#2
danielandrewclem
-
- Member
- 360 posts
Eagle Ray
- Gender:Male
- Location:Massachusetts
- Interests:writing, photography, fish
-
Posted 31 January 2011 - 11:54 AM
Some rebuttals here: http://andrewsulliva...our-brains.html
Flickr 5D Mk II & 20D | Ikelite
#3
derway
-
- Member
- 1136 posts
Great White
- Location:Pasadena CA
Posted 05 February 2011 - 11:04 AM
And of course, a true holographic 3D system would be indistinguishable from viewing the actual objects.
Don Erway
http://picasaweb.google.com/onederway/
http://www.pbase.com/derway
nikon n90s/ikelite housing/twin SS-200 canon G2/ikelite/DS-50/optical TTL slave
sony V3/ikelite/DS-51/Heinrich DA2 slave
http://picasaweb.google.com/onederway/
http://www.pbase.com/derway
nikon n90s/ikelite housing/twin SS-200 canon G2/ikelite/DS-50/optical TTL slave
sony V3/ikelite/DS-51/Heinrich DA2 slave
#4
Alex_Mustard
-
- Super Mod
-
- 8289 posts
The Doctor
- Gender:Male
- Location:La Maddalena
-
Posted 05 February 2011 - 02:26 PM
Whenever new technology appears there is always someone willing to speak out against it.
I'm not a great fan of 3D, but I think that an attitude of rejecting new technologies in their early days is misguided. Remember how many people were willing to speak out against digital still photography underwater, when it first appeared.
Alex
I'm not a great fan of 3D, but I think that an attitude of rejecting new technologies in their early days is misguided. Remember how many people were willing to speak out against digital still photography underwater, when it first appeared.
Alex
Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (waiting for housing).
#5
Kimmeineche
-
- Member
- 95 posts
Moray Eel
- Gender:Male
- Location:DK, Holstebro
- Interests:Stereo/3D Underwaterphoto/video-graphy, Marinelife and archaeology, diving and building cameraequipment.
-
Posted 06 February 2011 - 02:03 AM
You are so right Alex!
Reminds me of another guy (Don't remember his name...) who once upon a time said somthing like: It will never be possible to send human speach through a wire.... and if it ever will, it will be absolutely useless! Just another eksample on a statement that couldn't be more wrong....so who knows... maybe 3D has a future in a way we can't imagine!? :-)
So far, no visual effect more than 3D, has made me lost my lower jaws since I saw it for the first time, 13years ago. Hooked on 3D and putting a lot of money and time into it, I now got so many positve comments when I'm out, showing my 3D underwaterpictures for smaller audiences.... even I know it's far away from Hollywood.
The best regards from Kim! :-)
Reminds me of another guy (Don't remember his name...) who once upon a time said somthing like: It will never be possible to send human speach through a wire.... and if it ever will, it will be absolutely useless! Just another eksample on a statement that couldn't be more wrong....so who knows... maybe 3D has a future in a way we can't imagine!? :-)
So far, no visual effect more than 3D, has made me lost my lower jaws since I saw it for the first time, 13years ago. Hooked on 3D and putting a lot of money and time into it, I now got so many positve comments when I'm out, showing my 3D underwaterpictures for smaller audiences.... even I know it's far away from Hollywood.
The best regards from Kim! :-)
Whenever new technology appears there is always someone willing to speak out against it.
I'm not a great fan of 3D, but I think that an attitude of rejecting new technologies in their early days is misguided. Remember how many people were willing to speak out against digital still photography underwater, when it first appeared.
Alex
