The monitor is/was calibrated (Spider 3 - at 6500K, 2.2 - or more recently D65, L* on Coloreyes) and I have always been happy with how my images look on screen and how they print (in magazines - I am not a home printer). Many people often comment that my pictures are regularly the best printed in a mag (particular in Dive in the UK, where I write a column each month). I just calibrated semi-regularly and never gave it much further thought.
But since the move - I have not been getting calibrations that look right to me - they are not far off - just look a bit greeny or muddy looking on yellows! It is very minor - and I have had no complaints from anyone I have sent images too recently. I also think it might be because I have got used to my laptop screen as a standard while I have been on the road!
But this slight colour cast is across everything on my desktop - even a blank document. I have resorted to calibrating at a slightly high K - 6700, to get them looking right - but this doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Or is this a reasonable compensation for drift in my ageing monitor.
Anybody got any suggestions? Maybe it is time for a new screen, or maybe my spider hardware needs replacing? Or should I just ignore it! This is a minor thing - it is just something that was zero problem before.
What are other people calibrating their studio displays to? If I use D65/6500K settings - mine is slightly too greeny/muddy.
Alex
p.s. Here are a couple of images for evaluation - please note they are in Adobe RGB 1998 colour space - so should be downloaded and viewed in Photoshop. One is a saturated and colourful reef scene, one is a UK shot, with a natural greeny colour cast. I would like to know if you see a colour cast across both images or not (I am not interested in minor comments on colours).
