Canon 7D settings and audio hardware
#1
Posted 07 October 2011 - 01:33 AM
I will be doing a shoot in the next 2 weeks that will require me to use my Canon 7D for the full shoot,including b-roll and interviews.Now i've used the 7D before for mainly b-roll,where primary audio did'nt really play a role,however it will now.
Has anybody shot broadcast inserts or documentaries using the 7D,what audio options did you go with,clapper board,external recorder,etc or a lapel and short rifle mic
The 7D takes a small audio jack,should i use a lapel or 416 with XLR to small jack conversion?Also how does the 7D handle audio control in situations like wind,since you cant control the audio,is this a problem?
Im interested to know any settings anybody has used for broadcast.We will probably use GoProHD for the underwater sequence if we cannot get the 7D housed in time,so any Gopro tips for shooting in relatively green waters of depths of between 10-18 meters would help.
I have read the other threads in the forum on HDSLR but im looking for what settings people are using for video and what audio hardware too.
Thanks
Sony DSR 400P,Panasonic DVX 100B,Futura Pro Housing,Macbook Pro i5 (FCP,Aperture&Lightroom)
#2
Posted 07 October 2011 - 02:04 AM
Sony DSR 400P,Panasonic DVX 100B,Futura Pro Housing,Macbook Pro i5 (FCP,Aperture&Lightroom)
#3
Posted 07 October 2011 - 06:58 AM
I also agree your go-pros are not going to be much use in low light.
www.toddwinner.com
#4
Posted 07 October 2011 - 08:27 AM
Unless you are willing to use hack firmware (Magic Lantern) to get good audio control on the 7D, I 2nd using an external audio recorder and sync. If you are shooting an interview and don't mind having a mic visible, a lapel/lavalier mic hooked into a recorder is a good solution. Shotgun mic to recorder is also a good option but depends on your budget and also location. Not a good idea in a noisy place
Gopros are great for shallow work in good light, and so long as there is good light, it's good way to shoot C cam shots. They're using them for 2-3 sec shots in quite a few prime time productions.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#5
Posted 07 October 2011 - 09:20 AM
If you do wind up using the GoPro, switch out the GoPro's housing for either the Sartek or Eye of Mine housing which will enable superior focus, but as others have stated, it really is not the best cam to use for critical use on a project.
Steve
Ps Beachtec also has the DXA-SLR for audio capture with DSLRs. I have one but have not tried to use it yet for testing and review.
Edited by Steve Douglas, 07 October 2011 - 09:23 AM.
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#6
Posted 07 October 2011 - 10:00 AM
Can you please explain how the Eye of Mine or Sartek housings enable "superior focus" vs just changing out the dome for flat ports on the existing GoPro housings?
There are a bunch of polycarbonate and even acrylic lenses now available for the gopro housings. Unless one needs to go say pass 120ft, in which case those Eye of Mine housings are tested to 200ft. However I suspect that the Gopro can go pass that by more than a few feet. The Sartek glass port is probably more resistant to scratching, the bane of all polycarbonate ports. But then again a bit of polish and work and those scratches can be removed.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#7
Posted 07 October 2011 - 02:40 PM
I use a Tascam DR-100 for audio capture which I've found to be marginally better than the Zoom's. I don't even bother with plural eyes for sync I just make sure that I start and stop the 7D and audio capture within a couple of seconds of each other and as long as you have long(ish) clips like you'd get for interviews it is easy to sync in post.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, Simon
#8
Posted 07 October 2011 - 03:08 PM
Unless they have made some changes to it since the Go Pro first came out, I found that while their housing topside was just fine, underwater, even at shallow depths the image was very, very soft and appeared out of focus. When I put the Go Pro into either the Sartek or Eye of Mine housings, there was a great deal more clarity to the image. I have tried switching the domes and ports, just switching the different manufacturers housings. Why this is so, I am not an engineer and can not say but the difference is very noticeable.
Steve
Simon, sent you a PM
Edited by Steve Douglas, 07 October 2011 - 03:08 PM.
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#9
Posted 07 October 2011 - 09:31 PM
The Gopro dome can't focus underwater because of the virtual image is too close to the lens. The camera is has a fixed focus lens. It's been discussed before:
http://wetpixel.com/...showtopic=37243
In the last year, smarter people have come up with ways around this issue with flat ports. Eye of Mine and Sartek went the route of replacing the housings. Other companies went with replacing the housing lens. Just google/bing "gopro flat lens replacement"
I personally went with lens replacement because
1. It's absolutely a waste of polycarbonate to throw out the old housing just to change the lens. I use the 3D housing and my old Hero housings are still there for other use. Be green!
2. I wouldn't use the gopro past 100ft anyhow.
3. Cost: A new housing is $100 and up. Lens replacement: $20-40.
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#10
Posted 08 October 2011 - 02:22 AM
Cheers, Simon
#11
Posted 08 October 2011 - 06:59 AM
As a last resort i can use a A1U for underwater sequence,not ideal but will it work,i know it compressed HDV.
Sony DSR 400P,Panasonic DVX 100B,Futura Pro Housing,Macbook Pro i5 (FCP,Aperture&Lightroom)
#12
Posted 08 October 2011 - 07:06 AM
Dean
#13
Posted 08 October 2011 - 09:54 AM
Moderator
"Journalism is what someone else does not want printed, everything else is public relations."
#14
Posted 08 October 2011 - 10:35 AM
Steve
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#15
Posted 08 October 2011 - 10:58 AM
The 5D2 would be perfect but they looking for 1ooo pounds sterling for a weeks rental which is out of budget .
The housing rental on its own is affordable except i have a 7D,not a 5D2
Sony DSR 400P,Panasonic DVX 100B,Futura Pro Housing,Macbook Pro i5 (FCP,Aperture&Lightroom)
#16
Posted 08 October 2011 - 11:13 AM
Sony DSR 400P,Panasonic DVX 100B,Futura Pro Housing,Macbook Pro i5 (FCP,Aperture&Lightroom)
