Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4.0 vs Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
#1
Posted 01 February 2004 - 02:27 AM
Thanks
Rob
#2
Posted 01 February 2004 - 03:13 AM
The Lens is very good but also very thick (82mm). this can be a problem when housing it. So first check
1) If there is a fitting Port and a Zoom Gear for your housing
2) If you can find a fitting Diopter (which you'll probably need) for a reasonable price
Simon
#3
Posted 01 February 2004 - 03:33 AM
You should consider the 18-35 Nikkor also Fantastic Lens, I have the Sigma 17-35 and that's quite a sharp lens, but adding filters/dioptres is Very expensive due to the 82mm diameter. Edge definition is good on both too. Out of the three I'd pick the Nikkor 18-35mm.
#4
Posted 01 February 2004 - 03:37 AM
First thank you very much for your uick reply.
Yes there is a port at aquatica and it wouldn't need a diopter.
what are your experiences with your regarding edge sharpness at f 2.5-8 and what canon camera do you use for the lens?
Rob
Nikon D800 in Seacam D800, Nikon 16mm, 16-35mm, , 60mm, 105mm,1.4 and 2x TC, 2x Sea&Sea 110a, 2x Seacam Seaflash 150
#5
Posted 01 February 2004 - 03:50 AM
Thanks for your reply.
The thing is I sure would like the nikon 17-35 mm but that lens is way over my budget so I have to choose between the nikon 20-35 or the sigma 17-35.
What are your experiences with edge sharpness at f2.5-5, do you think I would miss the extr 3mm?
Rob
Nikon D800 in Seacam D800, Nikon 16mm, 16-35mm, , 60mm, 105mm,1.4 and 2x TC, 2x Sea&Sea 110a, 2x Seacam Seaflash 150
#6
Posted 01 February 2004 - 04:06 AM
#7
Posted 01 February 2004 - 04:06 AM
Simon
#8
Posted 04 February 2004 - 11:13 PM
Rob
Nikon D800 in Seacam D800, Nikon 16mm, 16-35mm, , 60mm, 105mm,1.4 and 2x TC, 2x Sea&Sea 110a, 2x Seacam Seaflash 150
