Guadalupe White Shark Photography
#1
Posted 06 June 2012 - 08:27 AM
1) the Tokina 10-17mm behind the S&S NX Dome Port
2) the Canon 17-40mm behind the S&S NX Dome Port plus the 40mm Port Extension
Having researched this in depth I am concerned that I may have made a bad decision with the 17-40mm and perhaps should have went for the 10-22mm (but its not too late to correct the mistake!). I understand there will be no 'right' setup 100% of the time - but I chose this setup as I think it will give me a good mix of shots of the sharks. Any input anyone has on shooting sharks from cages would be appreciated - especially in the good viz conditions at guadalupe. Should I bite the bullet and get the 10-22mm as well????
Thanks,
#2
Posted 06 June 2012 - 08:49 AM
Steve
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#3
Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:10 AM
Having researched this in depth I am concerned that I may have made a bad decision with the 17-40mm and perhaps should have went for the 10-22mm (but its not too late to correct the mistake!). I understand there will be no 'right' setup 100% of the time - but I chose this setup as I think it will give me a good mix of shots of the sharks. Any input anyone has on shooting sharks from cages would be appreciated - especially in the good viz conditions at guadalupe. Should I bite the bullet and get the 10-22mm as well????
When I was at Guadalupe I shot with a 5D (full-frame sensor) and a 16-35mm lens. It was rare that the animals were so close that I couldn't frame the shots well. When I was down 30 feet in the submersible cage the sharks were often too far away to shoot with the 16-35. All that being said, if I were to do it again I would shoot with my 16-35, but I would also bring my 15mm fisheye just for a different style of shot.
Here are my photos so you can get an idea of how that lens was shooting out there: (but please note that I was new to u/w photography at the time and those shots aren't great).
-Gina
#4
Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:46 AM
When I was at Guadalupe I shot with a 5D (full-frame sensor) and a 16-35mm lens. It was rare that the animals were so close that I couldn't frame the shots well. When I was down 30 feet in the submersible cage the sharks were often too far away to shoot with the 16-35. All that being said, if I were to do it again I would shoot with my 16-35, but I would also bring my 15mm fisheye just for a different style of shot.
Here are my photos so you can get an idea of how that lens was shooting out there: (but please note that I was new to u/w photography at the time and those shots aren't great).
-Gina
Thanks - Gina - that's what I hoped to hear:) Great shots!
#5
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:41 PM
Have a great trip!
Phil
Canon 7D, Subal, dual Inon Z240's, Tokina 10-17, Canon 60mm and 100mm
"Hey Dean! How do you work this crazy thing?!" Jerry Lewis
#6
Posted 06 June 2012 - 05:56 PM
I'm headed to Guadalupe in August on the Nautilus Explorer and I am looking for any input anyone has on the setup to shoot the sharks from the cages. I have the T2i and 2 lens set ups I plan on using:
1) the Tokina 10-17mm behind the S&S NX Dome Port
2) the Canon 17-40mm behind the S&S NX Dome Port plus the 40mm Port Extension
Having researched this in depth I am concerned that I may have made a bad decision with the 17-40mm and perhaps should have went for the 10-22mm (but its not too late to correct the mistake!). I understand there will be no 'right' setup 100% of the time - but I chose this setup as I think it will give me a good mix of shots of the sharks. Any input anyone has on shooting sharks from cages would be appreciated - especially in the good viz conditions at guadalupe. Should I bite the bullet and get the 10-22mm as well????
Thanks,
Please share your photos when you are back!!!
#7
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:09 AM
When I was there a couple years ago, I shot the 10-17 on my 40D and it was too wide for 90% of the shots. If I were going back today, I'd bring my Sigma 17-70 for the extra reach, so I think your 17-40 should be perfect.
Have a great trip!
Phil
Would like to see some examples of the shots you took with the 10-17. Since they come in pretty close, surprised that the 10-17 was too wide. It's been awhile since I've been there and didn't use a 10-17 the last time so would love to see some of your examples.
Steve
www.lafcpug.org
Steve Douglas
www.worldfilmsandtravel.com
I have worked as an unpaid reviewer for the editing websites since 2002. Most all hardware and software is sent to me free of charge, however, in no way am I obligated to provide either positive or negative evaluations. Any suggestions I make regarding products are a result of my own, completely, personal opinions and experiences with said products.
#8
Guest_patrickwilson86_*
Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:56 AM
Sharks are spooked by sudden bursts of motion. Their instinctive reaction is to get away from the “noise” maker. Therefore, the best approach is to remain calm, move slowly, and avoid big clouds of bubbles. A small steady stream of bubbles is less intrusive than the large explosion associated with holding your breath!
