Nikon TC-17E II AF-S 1,7x
#1
Posted 07 June 2012 - 02:41 AM
does this teleconverter from Nikon the Nikon TC-17E II AF-S 1,7x fitt the nikon 105mm 2.8 afs vr and the nikon 70-200 2.8 vrI???
Rob
Nikon D800 in Seacam D800, Nikon 16mm, 16-35mm, , 60mm, 105mm,1.4 and 2x TC, 2x Sea&Sea 110a, 2x Seacam Seaflash 150
#2
Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:05 AM
None of the optical shortcomings of the Kenkos.
Alex
Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (waiting for housing).
#3
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:47 AM
None of the optical shortcomings of the Kenkos.
Alex
Question. Would a Nikon TC be better choice than a Kenkos for CFWA?
#4
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:57 AM
Question. Would a Nikon TC be better choice than a Kenkos for CFWA?
Nope: Nikon have carefully made them incompatible with wide-angle lenses...
Tim
#5
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:57 AM
#6
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:02 AM
The Nikon TC's do not work with the Tokina 10-17. But they are really excellent quality - the 2x TC with the 70-200 is phenomenal.
I agree. The 3rd generation 2x was supposedly designed specifically for the 70-200mm VR2. I am going to buy one next time it is in stock at my local camera shop.
Alex
Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (waiting for housing).
#7
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:07 AM
I agree. The 3rd generation 2x was supposedly designed specifically for the 70-200mm VR2. I am going to buy one next time it is in stock at my local camera shop.
Alex
It's a stoater: I've used it to turn my 105mm micro lens into a quite nice 210mm telephoto!
Puffins
Tim
Edited by tdpriest, 07 June 2012 - 05:14 AM.
#8
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:33 AM
Nope: Nikon have carefully made them incompatible with wide-angle lenses...
Tim
I understand now.
Thanks for the clarification,
Elmer
#9
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:03 AM
It's a stoater:
Tim
ĦAy cramba! Now we need to understand Scottish expressions?
"England and America are two countries separated by a common language." - GBS
Bob
Carpe carp - Seize the carp
#10
Posted 08 June 2012 - 09:14 AM
Edited by mreid, 08 June 2012 - 09:17 AM.
#11
Posted 09 June 2012 - 02:30 AM
In regards to teleconverters compatibility you can also go to the nikonusa website and it shows you which lens are compatible and if fully functional I.e. can you use autofocus.
Strangely enough the site claims:
Prod. #
Lens Description
TC-14E II
TC-17E II
TC-20E II
TC-20E III
2160
AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
AF not possible
AF not possible
AF not possible
AF not possible
I am using the 105 and TC-20E III and it doesn't have any problems autofocusing (not even during a nightdive). SO I am not 100% sure how accurate the table is. Did anybody else experience any problems with AF?
#12
Posted 13 June 2012 - 03:04 AM
Strangely enough the site claims:
Prod. #
I am using the 105 and TC-20E III and it doesn't have any problems autofocusing (not even during a nightdive). SO I am not 100% sure how accurate the table is. Did anybody else experience any problems with AF?
This is basic NCTA (Nikon Covering Their Ass) fine print. A 2x converter on the 105mm pushes the total aperture just above the specs of the "old" autofocus sensor which is good up to f/5.6. I know the math doesn't seem right but actual test show that the real aperture with a converter pushes it beyond the 5.6 mark.
With the other combinations (1,4 and 1,7) I don't know why they would be listed as non compatible. However the new specs on the D4 and D800, autofocus up to f/8, puts all combinations within specs. I have had no problems using this combination with the D4.
Cheers,
Espen
Edited by EspenRekdal, 13 June 2012 - 05:31 AM.
