I realise a greater aperture is possible but could one not just raise the iso in this case to counteract the slower flash sync speed at the same aperture?
Thanks
Paul
Edited by Scubysnaps, 07 November 2012 - 08:24 AM.
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:22 AM
Edited by Scubysnaps, 07 November 2012 - 08:24 AM.
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:51 AM
Could anybody maybe elaborate on this, and perhaps show some examples where it is needed faster than 1/200 and poor results may be given to anything slower?
I realise a greater aperture is possible but could one not just raise the iso in this case to counteract the slower flash sync speed at the same aperture?
Thanks
Paul
Carpe carp - Seize the carp
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:55 AM
Posted 07 November 2012 - 02:57 PM
Nikon D800, Nikon 60, 105, 16-35, Sigma 15, Nauticam D800, Zen 230mm, Subsee +5 & +10, 2*INON Z240
Posted 07 November 2012 - 03:39 PM
I suppose that it should give you a bit more maneuverability for the color of the Background. Nowadyas, ISO gives you wiggle room there anyway...
I assume that it could help a bit for freezing action. I can not really see that it makes a big difference between 200us & 250us.
If I am correct most Canons have 200us as synch and they seem to take just fine Pics!
Carpe carp - Seize the carp
Posted 07 November 2012 - 11:38 PM
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:54 AM



Edited by Aussiebyron, 08 November 2012 - 01:56 AM.
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:59 AM
Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:34 AM