I'm an idiot? Panasonic LX7
#1
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:17 PM
#2
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:28 PM
Oh, guest what? Ikelite makes housing for the LX-7!!!! So there are options beside Nauticam. If you're in the market for this camera, hurry up!
#3
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:40 PM
#4
Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:54 AM
#5
Posted 04 January 2013 - 12:37 AM
I am going to run some comparative tests with the RX100 with regards to image sharpness, low light performance and stabilisation and put them on my blog
As far as I can see the HX30v has the same image stabiliser of the rx100 however it has a slow f3.2 zoom lens, as the stabiliser is optical the better results compared to the RX100 could depend by the smaller size of lens and imaging chip. Honestly I would not take anything with aperture less than f/2 in water with the HX30V you are already 2 and 1/3 fstops behind which means in low light you will be shooting at high gain which means a lot of noise on a small sensor camera
There is an ikelite housing for the lx7 and it is not massive costs around 550 if you are on a budget I would check that one
#6
Posted 04 January 2013 - 03:49 PM
http://picasaweb.google.com/onederway/
http://www.pbase.com/derway
nikon n90s/ikelite housing/twin SS-200 canon G2/ikelite/DS-50/optical TTL slave
sony V3/ikelite/DS-51/Heinrich DA2 slave
#7
Posted 05 January 2013 - 11:38 AM
I believe you can easily do 3+ dives even with S-TTL with the wired connection even more but then you have some sync speed restrictions
#8
Posted 07 January 2013 - 10:03 AM
Anyway, I suspect the image stabilizer in the HX30v is better than the RX100. I read that the RX100 has bigger sensor so it's harder to stabilize. Besides, if you scroll to 1:50 in this video, there is a proof:
When comparing the LX7 and the HV30v. I can notice that the HX30V is much smooth on verticle panning, as if the camera is on a float/fly cam. Horizantally they seem to be the same for me even the LX7 can only do "Standard" IS since it doesn't have "Active".
The LX7 offer more video control, I like that you can have Vivid, monocrome in video mode. The big deciding factor is the LX can offer RAW picture, which I thing it could come in handy.
As far as the HX30 being diving camera, it's all personal. I only dive in tropical water, so visibility and sunlight is good enough for 3.2F Unless it get cloudy. I'm not sure about take video during night dive yet, so I might grow into it.
As for the housing for LX7, I did consider Ikelite, but there are a couple features missing in the Ikelite, one of it is you can use the ND/Focus toggle. Also, the Ikelite doesn't allow shutter button half press to lock focus. All these are quite important to consider when you start to get serious.
#9
Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:06 PM
For photos not much maybe Ikelite considered it more from a still point of view? I am surprised that their housing does not manage all controls
#10
Posted 19 February 2013 - 07:11 AM
#11
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:46 AM
Thanks! It's a nicely build camera, feels very solid. Will take mine under water in May!
#12
Posted 21 February 2013 - 07:02 AM
I just completed a bit of tests on wet lenses. Just waiting for a part to arrive. The auto focus of this camera is excellent and really fast though I will not be using it for pictures surely that is a great advantage compared to other cameras
#13
Posted 21 February 2013 - 07:54 AM
The fiber optic connections, however are ultrareliable. Better than any hard wired strobe I've ever used.
Life is a beach and then you dive.
My Website
#14
Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:46 AM
Using the on camera strobe, the battery on the RX100 only last for 2 dives.
The fiber optic connections, however are ultrareliable. Better than any hard wired strobe I've ever used.
That depends on the strobe you have got. You need an Inon Z240 or a Sea and Sea YS-D1 with the RX100 and for wide angle really two otherwise the internal flash dumps a full blast, drains the battery and takes forever to re-charge
