Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

OM-D with +5 or +10 diopter for 12-50mm Olympus?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 robert_t

robert_t

    Damselfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 24 December 2012 - 05:23 AM

Hi everyone!

I got the following plan for taking the O-MD underwater:

Nauticam housing
4" dome port for 9-18mm and 12-50mm

With the austrian custom zoom gear I will be able to operate the 12-50mm behind the 4" nauticam semi dome.
That should have the advantage of the increased field of view on the wide end compated to operating it behind the standard 12-50 Nauticam port.

Since I will not be able to get to macro mode with that option, I want to add the Nauticam flip diopter holder to the port to add either a Subsee +5 or + 10 diopter.

Since I have no experience with diopters yet, I am however not sure which one to choose.

I also plan to get the Olympus 60mm macro in the near future. I have read in some other forum, that one will also fit behind the Nauticam 4" dome port as it's nearly the same length as the 12-50mm
That would then give me a very compact setup with only one port which would be ideal when I want/have to travel light.

So the big question now is which diopter to choose for this setup. The Subsee +5 or +10


I may in the future add the Nauticam port for the 60mm macro to have a dedicated macro port which would give some more magnification compared to the dome port. Alex Mustard also confirmed that the 12-50 can be operated behind this port without any restricions.
So here again I could add the flip diopter holder to get macro functionality on the 12-50 when operating it behind this dome.

Like I said I have no experience with diopters, so I have no clue if it would be better to choose the +5 diopter for this setup or go with the +10 diopter.
With the 60mm macro I will be able to get to 1:1 anyway, so I'm not sure if the +10 diopter may not be a bit of an overkill here and if it would be better to only have a +5 diopter.
For the 12-50mm I have no idea how much the difference between the +5 and +10 will be. Since I'm planning to get the 60mm for serious macro work anyway, I'm currently leaning more towards the +5 diopter because it will be enough to get good macro with the 12-50 but must not be 1:1 since I will have the 60mm for that anyway when needed.

Any input will be very much appreciated.

Many thank's,

Robert

#2 MikeO

MikeO

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1025 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA, USA

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:49 PM

Will the dome work with the diopters? I would have thought you'd need a flat port . . .

Mike Oelrich
Canon EOS 40D in Seatool housing, 100mm macro, Tokina 10-17, INON Z-240s.


#3 Karl

Karl

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 171 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rockingham, Western Australia

Posted 26 December 2012 - 03:46 AM

Will the dome work with the diopters? I would have thought you'd need a flat port . . .


AFAIK - yes they will only work with flat port. I wouldn't even know how to fit a diopter to a dome port - if it is at all possible??

Why not get the Nauticam port for the 60mm as this should work very well with the gearing you have bought and you can screw the M67 wet lenses directly onto the front of the port.

Karl
Everyone is entitled to my opinion!!

#4 robert_t

robert_t

    Damselfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 04:38 AM

Will the dome work with the diopters? I would have thought you'd need a flat port . . .


Yes, there is a new Nauticam diopter holder for the dome port.
It's this one here at reefphoto for example

It is designed specifically for the Nauticam 4" wide angle port.

#5 robert_t

robert_t

    Damselfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 04 January 2013 - 02:32 AM

Does nobody here have any experience with using SubSee diopters with normal (non macro) lenses??

#6 Alex_Mustard

Alex_Mustard

    The Doctor

  • Super Mod
  • 8375 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough

Posted 04 January 2013 - 02:47 AM

With a flat port I found the dioptre worked with the 12-50 through almost all the range (from 15-50mm). Wider than 15mm it cut off.

http://wetpixel.com/...pic=48650&st=40

Alex

Alexander Mustard - www.amustard.com - www.magic-filters.com
Nikon D4 (Subal housing). Nikon D7100 (Subal housing). Olympus EPL-5 (Nauticam housing).


#7 robert_t

robert_t

    Damselfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:34 AM

With a flat port I found the dioptre worked with the 12-50 through almost all the range (from 15-50mm). Wider than 15mm it cut off.

http://wetpixel.com/...pic=48650&st=40

Alex


Thank's for the information and that's good news.
With the wider view of the dome port I expect that I will have to zoom in a bit more, but should probably work at least from 25-50mm, which is good enough.

So for that purpose do you think the +5 diopter will be enough or is it better if I go directly for the +10 diopter?
I'm currently leaning more towards the +5 diopter since it will be smaller and lighter than the +10
With the 60mm macro lens I'm planning to get anyway, I think it should be good enough as I can go a bit more over 1:1 which is probably all I will need anyway.


But I may be wrong so I thought I'll better ask first :)