a couple of questions regarding 7d lenses and possilbe OM D
#1
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:09 PM
My other option is to get Olympus OM D and sell off my 7d. This option would initially be more expensive because I would have to purchase the camera and lenses in additon to everything else. I could pay for it by selling the 7d along with my 17-55, 70-200, 100-400, two sigma's 30 and 50mm and the two i mentoned above. As you can see over the years I have collected some nice glass and am apprehensive about switching systems. Does this sound like a crazy thing to do?
#2
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:19 AM
I would see no reason to go out and buy a new camera, lenses etc when you already have all that glass!
Now, the 100mm, IS vs non IS, I'd say that for underwater work the IS is not all that interesting since you are almost always shooting very fast shutter-speeds when doing macro anyways, I mean, how often do you do a 1/10 sec exposure with a 100mm? Also since we always use strobes to expose our macro subjects, the IS makes even less sense, the IS was (correct me if I'm wrong) made to do handheld exposures on land without flash.
Stick with your 100mm USM, great lens!
For the wide-angle, I only tried out the 10-22 briefly (for a single dive) and I liked it, its for sure a good lens, would be good for photographing divers, wrecks, sharks etc, basically subjects where you don't want the massive barrel-distortion of a fisheye lens like the Tokina 10-17.
What I love about the 10-17 is the option to put it in a mini-dome. It makes "close focus wide angle" lighting so much easier and allows you to get really close to critters such as large frogfish, seahorses, scorpionfish, anemone fish etc. Another nice thing about a minidome is that its, well, small and therefore great to travel with.
I was just looking through some lens charts from aquatica, and you can actually fit the 10-17 and 10-22 behind the same dome, check it out here: http://www.aquatica....anon_type_2.pdf
According to this chart the 10-17 and the 10-22 should both work behind the 6" dome.
With the 6" dome of course CFWA becomes increasingly difficult, but should still be sort of ok.
Good luck working out what to buy!
-Morten
Manager @ The Siddhartha Dive Resort & Spa, Bali
http://aquaticphotography.webs.com/
#3
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:24 AM
The tokina & canon lenses are two different lenses so depending on what you want to shoot as to what lens to go for.
I have just purchased a 7D & nauticam setup & have the 10-22 lens but have only taken it underwater once & it is plenty wide.
Cheers pete.
My Vimeo page vimeo.com/user8157547
PHOTO - Canon 7D-Nauticam Housing/60mm macro/10-22mm/twin Z240 strobes.
VIDEO - Panasonic HVX200/Gates Housing/EM43 Monitor/SWP44/L&M Sola 4000s.
#4
Posted 07 January 2013 - 11:24 AM
Morten, do you think a 6" dome is enough? I don't have any experience focusing with domes.
#5
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:13 PM
I should probably mention that I am by no means an expert in dome-port optics but what I know is that the length of your extension ring (ring that goes between housing and dome) is extremely important for overall sharpness/ability to focus (see the lens chart).
I always shoot with the 10-17 and a very small 4" dome and I love it, because of the strong curvature of the small dome you do get unsharp image corners at high apertures. If you want to have the corners tack sharp then you need to stop down to f.8 or lower, but then again, how important is it really that the corners are totally 100% sharp?
Hehe, think of that gorgeous shark over-under shot with the one eye above the surface, teeth clearly showing, almost bumping the dome with his snout, while the sun is setting in the background, now tell me if you really care about having tack-sharp corners
As far as I can see, the only major disadvantage of using a small dome such as my 4" mini-dome is that over-unders are basically impossible to get right, for that you need a bigger dome, I believe a 8" or even a 9,5" is preferred by most.
With a 8" or 9,5" dome of course then it would be impossible/very hard to get close-focus-wide-angle shots of critters :/
It seems there is never a perfect choice that is great for everything but I guess the 6" dome is a good choice to start out with!
Happy bubbles, Morten
Manager @ The Siddhartha Dive Resort & Spa, Bali
http://aquaticphotography.webs.com/
#6
Posted 07 January 2013 - 11:06 PM
http://photofocus.co...ng-term-review/
and this on selling Canon gear in favour of the OM-D:
http://photofocus.co...-gear-for-sale/
Plus there's rumours of a 7Dmk2 announcement in Jan/Feb:
http://www.canonrumo...non-7d-mark-ii/
#7
Posted 08 January 2013 - 09:44 AM
Even if a 7Dmk2 were to come out, you'll be waiting easily till the summer till a new housing is ready for it.
Cheers
S.
www.stewartsy.com
SLS Photography, when your images matter....
Aquatica, Amphibico, TLC, ULCS (Philippines), Stix, iTorch, Magic Filter Dealer
Philippine Dive Trip Specialist
#8
Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:13 PM
