Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

is nikon SB 105 strobe really that bad?


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 gorantrener

gorantrener

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:06 AM

hello, i am wondering why SB 105 strobes are that cheap?
i mean, these days you can buy unused piece for less then 200 $.
that is significantly cheaper then any other strobe currently being popular.
is really SB 105 that useless or has much less power or what is the trick?
thanks for opinions.
P.S. i am aware of current process where nikon changes 103s with 105 s for free, but
that cannot be the only reason i suppose

#2 Steve Williams

Steve Williams

    Humpback Whale

  • Moderator
  • 3044 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tucson, Arizona
  • Interests:Protecting our Ocean, Environmental Education,
    Having fun and Living Well

Posted 12 January 2013 - 07:07 AM

It's just a little behind by todays standards. Bigger than the more powerful strobes available today, only has three power levels, not as wide as current units. That said a lot of folks still use them and they work. You just give up some capability and ease of use.

Cheers,
Steve

The Fin Foundation
My Images on Flikr

Canon7D & 40D, 60mm, 100mm, 17-40L, Tokina 10-17, Nauticam 7D, Sea & Sea MDX-40D YS-250's ULCS arms, Lightroom


#3 MikeVeitch

MikeVeitch

    1.7kbps Manta Boy

  • Senior Moderator
  • 6185 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:In Bali, Indonesia but from Vancouver, BC
  • Interests:Teaching Underwater Photography

Posted 12 January 2013 - 10:24 AM

Nothing wrong with the 105 strobe, its a good one! However, it won't work with TTL with most of the modern cameras as far as I know. You will have to shoot full manual with it. but that shouldn't be a problem

Join us for an Underwater Photography Workshop in Ambon March 2015
Blog and Photo Archive/Portfolio Site www.mikeveitchblog.com
Learn underwater photography in Indonesia or Join me on a trip www.underwatertribe.com


#4 JimG

JimG

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 258 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorkshire, UK
  • Interests:Photography - underwater and avian, natural history

Posted 13 January 2013 - 01:18 AM

I have used them for years. Super, quite powerful bit of kit with Nikon quality. As said above, always on manual and I don't believe they are compatible with TTL converters. Don't spread the word round or the price will go up!

Jim Greenfield - Canon 5D Mark 3/Aquatica
My Web Site


#5 gorantrener

gorantrener

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 January 2013 - 03:31 AM

hahaha good point Jim! also Mike and Steve, thanks for sharing opinions. i shoot strectly manual so TTL incompatibility doesnt bother me too much. also i see from specs that it has not so wide coverage but in 99% situations you can get away with it. also the weight and power supply doesnt look like too big problem (travell issues)

#6 scuba_d

scuba_d

    Lionfish

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough
  • Interests:photography

Posted 13 January 2013 - 05:01 AM

I am still happily using 2 of them. The size has an advantage too. When I put the big dome port on my housing and 2 SB105 the system is just a little negatively buoyant as I like it.

Pete

#7 Ken Kurtis

Ken Kurtis

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 100 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beverly Hills, CA

Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:43 PM

I recently switched from dual SB-105s to dual S&S YS-D1s (which I love). That being said, I also loved my SB-105s but there are definitely limitiations you have to adapt to. Lack of TTL is not an issue for me since I shoot in full manual. It was a little bit of a PITA to only have three power settings (Full, 1/4, 1/16) which means any change is a 2-stop change. But you learn to adapt. And I mostly shot with them on 1/4 power and then adjusted my subject-camera distance &/or f-stop to get what I wanted. The biggest proboem is getting them serviced if something goes wrong. No one seems to want to touch them anymore. I live in Los Angeles where's there's a walk-in Nikon-operated factory repair center and they farm them out to someone up in the Bay area where the minimum repair charge is $224.

FWIW, if you've still got your heart set on SB-105s (they're compact, run off of AA batteries, and are powerful), I've got 6 - 2 working great and 4 in various stages of working/not-working - that are just taking up space on my shelf. Contact me privately (kenkurtis@aol.com) if you're interested in giving them a new home.

- Ken

P.S. i am aware of current process where nikon changes 103s with 105 s for free, but
that cannot be the only reason i suppose


According to the folks I talk to at Nikon here in LA, they stopped that program in the middle of 2012-ish.

- Ken
Ken Kurtis
(Nikon D200 in an Ikelite housing w/dual YS-D1s & a GoPro Hero2 in a Backscatter housing w/dual Sola 1200s)
NAUI Instr. #5936 • Owner, Reef Seekers Dive Co. • Beverly Hills, CA
www.reefseekers.com

#8 gorantrener

gorantrener

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2013 - 07:39 AM

Ken you are right, service problem is an issue, also in Europe noone wants to touch 105s for repair.
About Nikon Europe, i managed to change old forgotten 103 for 105 somewhere mid summer 2012, guess i was lucky then.
After that bought another 2 in ebay, so dont really need another. Thanks for offer anyway, maybe some1 else will catch you when
it is now obvious that nothing is wrong with 105s.