Jump to content

- - - - -

Tokina 10-17 dome port comparison

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 rumblefish


    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 142 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Underwater photography and wreckdiving. Editor in chief of 'Onderwatersport', the monthly magazine of the Dutch Dive Branch.

Posted 16 March 2013 - 03:38 AM

Hi all,

I made some unscientific test shots in the pool the other day, to see how the Tokina 10-17 FE performs on a 24 mp full frame camera behind two different dome ports. 

Camera: Nikon D600, Tokina on 15mm, ISO 6400 (ambient light), Aperture priority. Focus point was at the center. I ran the raw files through Lightroom to adjust white balance and lighting. No cropping, sharpening or noise reduction were applied. I sharpened for screen upon exporting to jpegs. 


First three shots using the Tokina 10-17FE behind Subal 4" minidome (DP-54 B)

Last three shots same lens behind Subal 6" dome (DP-SW B). No extension rings.


I guess f11 is the limit. At 15mm behind the 6" port the dome shade is visible in the corners (slight vignetting), limiting it's use to the long end. 

Best regards,


Attached Images

  • 10-17minidome-1.jpg
  • 10-17minidome-2.jpg
  • 10-17minidome-3.jpg
  • 10-17dome-1.jpg
  • 10-17dome-2.jpg
  • 10-17dome-3.jpg

Nikon D810, D600, D80, Sigma 15mm FE, Nikon 16-35mm, Tokina 10-17mm FE, Sigma 24mm macro, Nikon 60mm macro, Nikon 105mm macro, Sigma 180mm macro. Nauticam NA-D810, 45° viewfinder, Subal ND80. Sea&Sea YS-D1 (2x), YS350 and YS90. ULCS arms.