Anyone tried Topaz Lab Plugin's?
Which one's, if any, are worthwhile?
Is the noise reduction substantially better than LR4?
2 replies to this topic
#1
diver dave1
-
- Member
-
- 903 posts
Great White
- Gender:Male
- Interests:chess, u/w photography
-
Posted 10 April 2013 - 08:43 AM
Nauticam D7000, Inon Z-240's, 60 micro, 105 micro, Tokina 10-17
www.shiningseastudio.com
#2
rtrski
-
- Member
-
- 973 posts
Great White
- Gender:Male
- Location:Texas, USA
- Interests:Slowly learning digital photography and underwater digital photography. Like drinking from a salt-water firehose... ;-)
-
Posted 10 April 2013 - 12:25 PM
I've read it is, but haven't taken the plunge myself. The new price for all the NIK plugins has me much more curious about them, frankly.
http://www.niksoftwa...ntro/main.shtml
If all else fails, get a bigger hammer...
Current rig: Sony SLT-alpha55 in Ikelite housing, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro in 6" 5503.80 dome (+2 diopter optional), Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM behind UWCamStuff custom 5" mini-dome. Dual INON z240 Type IVs. Homebuilt LED/fiberoptic triggering.
Current rig: Sony SLT-alpha55 in Ikelite housing, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro in 6" 5503.80 dome (+2 diopter optional), Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM behind UWCamStuff custom 5" mini-dome. Dual INON z240 Type IVs. Homebuilt LED/fiberoptic triggering.
#3
mattia
-
- Member
-
- 7 posts
Starfish
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:36 PM
Lightroom had very good NR, but the NIk suite offers a great deal for difficult shots. It works much better with photoshop (edits as layers rather than exported duplicate tiffs), and at te new pricing, its a steal. I use DxO or LR for normal processing, and move to NIK in photoshop for images that go to print, require more complex editing and/or local adjustments. I haven't needed to do much actual masking since getting NIK thanks to the control point system.
