Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Pool Fashion Shooting


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Rene Zuch

Rene Zuch

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 April 2013 - 11:37 AM

Hi,

 

I experimented yesterday in a pool and wanted to share some of the results with you.

 

All done with the Nikon D800 and the Nikon 16-35mm and a prototype of a new dome.

 

I went with Nat a good friend of mine. She already had some experience with this kind of stuff and is a diver what surely helps.

 

DSC_0811.jpg

 

DSC_0750.jpg

 

DSC_0667.jpg

 

In the end my daughter 3.5 years was jealous and wanted to be a model as well.

 

DSC_0594.jpg

 

I´m interested in your feedback.

 

Cheers René


Edited by Rene Zuch, 22 April 2013 - 11:38 AM.


#2 loftus

loftus

    Blue Whale

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4571 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Winter Park, Fl

Posted 23 April 2013 - 03:52 AM

I like #3, #1 as well. A comment on model posing. Limbs towards or away from the camera and not in the image plane are distorted, so it's important to instruct the model on this. In image #1 the distortion can be assumed to be intentional and works, in #2, the knees and feet look too big and and hands too small, the distortion can be assumed to be unintended so it does not work.


Nikon D800, Nikon D7000, Nauticam, Inons, Subtronic Novas. Lens collection - 10-17, 15, 16, 16-35, 14-24, 24-70, 85, 18-200, 28-300, 70-200, 60 and 105, TC's. Macs with Aperture and Photoshop.

#3 Rene Zuch

Rene Zuch

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2013 - 04:06 AM

Hi Loftus,

 

I'm aware of this problem. But sometimes it's not possible to avoid (because it limits creativity too much) and I found out it's possible to correct this later on in the software, eventhough it's not easy. I did not spent much time on these pics in postprocessing yet.

 

Thanks for your feedback.

 

René



#4 asmigel

asmigel

    Wolf Eel

  • Moderator
  • 111 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:12 AM

Rene,

 

Great shots! I really like # 3 because of the reflections - but that is my personal preference, utilizing the unique aspects of shooting underwater to enhance the images.

Nat looks very comfortable underwater! Sometimes the hardest part is finding a good model :)

 

~abi



#5 E_viking

E_viking

    Manta Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 404 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Munich, Germany
  • Interests:UW Photography, Diving,
    Skiing & Mountaineering

Posted 23 April 2013 - 10:24 AM

Nice Pictures.

I prefer #3 as well, due to the surface reflections and a more "natural" look.

 

/Erik


Nikon D800, Nikon 60, 105, 16-35, Sigma 15, Nauticam D800, Zen 230mm, Subsee +5 & +10, 2*INON Z240


#6 rumblefish

rumblefish

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 134 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Underwater photography and wreckdiving. Contributing editor to dive magazines in The Netherlands and Belgium.

Posted 23 April 2013 - 10:40 AM

+1 for #3. Very nice. Can you tell us more about the lighting and dome?

--Rob


Nikon D600, Nikon D80, Tokina 10-17mm FE, Sigma 14mm, 24mm macro, Nikon 60mm macro, Sigma 180mm macro. Nauticam NA-D600, 45° viewfinder, Subal ND80, GS180 viewfinder. Sea&Sea YS350 and YS90. ULCS arms.


#7 Rene Zuch

Rene Zuch

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:35 AM

@All

 

Thanks for your feedback. My daughter is a bit sad that nobody recognized her potential to become a Nr. one model.

 

@abi

 

You're right. To find a good model is maybe the hardest part. And Nat does this job really great and is fun to be with.

 

@Rob

The lighting was done with two Ikelite DS161 strobes. The dome is a prototype from uwcamerastuff and it´s a 8" full half-sphere(sounds strange but hope you know what I mean).

There are still some buoyancy problems to solve with it as it really wants to float up, but the optical quality and corner sharpness is excellent. And problems are there to solve.

 

 

Here are some more pics:

 

DSC_0674.jpg

 

 

DSC_0737.jpg

 

Regards René



#8 diver dave1

diver dave1

    Great White

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 923 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:chess, u/w photography

Posted 23 April 2013 - 06:56 PM

The photo's of your model make me say, 'nice' or 'very nice'.  The photo of your daughter made me smile.  So the model touched my sense of appreciation but your daughter touched me deeper.  No matter how much we try the artistic, the joy of a child is hard to beat.


Nauticam D7000, Inon Z-240's, 60 micro, 105 micro, Tokina 10-17

www.shiningseastudio.com


#9 Ronyx

Ronyx

    Moray Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 94 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Photography, Diving, Adventure Motorcycling

Posted 24 April 2013 - 05:04 AM

#3 in the first set works the best for me and I like #2 in. The second set

#10 Fireflys

Fireflys

    Triggerfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 39 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:S/W London & S/W Ireland
  • Interests:Diving, Photography,

Posted 24 April 2013 - 11:23 AM

I like the foreshortening effect and I think it works very well and looks natural, they are all excellent in my eyes I’d like to see more.
 
                  Gary.


#11 Rene Zuch

Rene Zuch

    Clownfish

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 April 2013 - 10:06 AM

@All

 

Thanks for the nice feedback

 

@diver-dave

wise words......

 

Thanks René