Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panasonic 12-35?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Pajjpen

Pajjpen

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 243 posts

Posted 02 January 2018 - 06:17 AM

Is anyone using the 12-35 for underwater use? Saw one guy using it for filming moving and medium sized subjects that a macro lens just cant do and it seemed to perform well behind the dome.
I havent seen anyone talk about this lens for underwater use on the forums tho.
Anyone?

#2 Architeuthis

Architeuthis

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austria
  • Interests:Diving / Photograpy / Video / Gardening / Cooking / Handcraft

Posted 02 January 2018 - 07:10 AM

Hi Pajjpen,

 

I do not have the Panasonic 12-35mm, but use the Zuiko 12-40mm Pro with the Zen DP170 (as several others here).

 

Both lenses are similar, but the Zuiko is sligthly sharper in the corners and also goes to 40mm instead of 35mm: https://www.dxomark....3_1136_960_1136

 

I can say that the Zuiko 12-40mm performs very good behind the Zen DP170. According to Zen even the extension is identical for the Pana 12-35mm (for Nauticam N85 system), so maybe good performance also here: http://www.jaredpars...p/nauticam-n85/

 

 

Wolfgang



#3 Pajjpen

Pajjpen

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 243 posts

Posted 02 January 2018 - 11:13 AM

I read about that lens too but as I shoot video Ioulent mind the stabilisation. Think I’ll order the 12-35 as I already have the 6inch dome for the 7-14, making it convenient.
Btw, u wouldn’t be interested in selling your 12-35 if u don’t use it?

#4 SWink

SWink

    Lionfish

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 January 2018 - 03:18 PM

Pajjpen.

 

I have the 12-35mm and find that it works really well behind the 6" Dome. But I find that I generally opt for the 7-14mm more often than not when I want to shoot wide.

 

If you only have the dome port it is possible to do some semi-macro with the 12-35mm if shoot 4K and deliver HD with some re-framing. I also have the Olympus 12-50mm but I find that it doesn't really perform that well behind the dome.

 

Cheers

Steve


My Video: Panasonic GH4, Nauticam Housing, 7-14mm, 12-35mm, 45mm, & Olypmus 14-42mm, 12-50mm 60mm. Archon W42VR x 2, Inon LF800-N
My Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube..../SteveWinkworth


#5 Pajjpen

Pajjpen

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 243 posts

Posted 02 January 2018 - 03:29 PM

Pajjpen.
 
I have the 12-35mm and find that it works really well behind the 6" Dome. But I find that I generally opt for the 7-14mm more often than not when I want to shoot wide.
 
If you only have the dome port it is possible to do some semi-macro with the 12-35mm if shoot 4K and deliver HD with some re-framing. I also have the Olympus 12-50mm but I find that it doesn't really perform that well behind the dome.
 
Cheers
Steve

I actually just bought the lens. I won’t use it for much wide angle but more for medium sized subjects like octopus and stuff that tends to move that I just can’t shoot with the 60mm. Gonna give it a go in lembeh later this year

#6 ChrisRoss

ChrisRoss

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 160 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 03 January 2018 - 02:32 AM

I use the 12-40mm Olympus, Certainly for stills it's a better package, it focuses closer and achieves 0.3x magnification compared 0.17x for the Panasonic, very sharp and works well behind the Zen 170mm dome.



#7 bubffm

bubffm

    Eagle Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 03 January 2018 - 01:55 PM

Is anyone using the 12-35 for underwater use? Saw one guy using it for filming moving and medium sized subjects that a macro lens just cant do and it seemed to perform well behind the dome.
I havent seen anyone talk about this lens for underwater use on the forums tho.
Anyone?

 

I am one of those guys using it for filming  :)  I find it quite useful and versatile when you don't want a true WA and a macro is too narrow.

 

Unfortunately I only have a printed zoom gear. I had the Nauticam zoom and focus gear ordered just to find out when it arrived that it didnt fit  - so it went back...  Questions to Nauticam support about it have never been answered...Poor...  Seems to be a lens not that much used.  Still, I quite like it.

 

It works well behind a WA Dome with the right extension as per Nauticam-chart. Very sharp and no vignetting throughout the zoom range.


Edited by bubffm, 03 January 2018 - 02:03 PM.


#8 Pajjpen

Pajjpen

    Sting Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 243 posts

Posted 03 January 2018 - 01:57 PM

 
I am one of those guys using it for filming  :)  I find it quite useful and versatile when you don't want a true WA and a macro is too narrow.
 
Unfortunately I only have a printed zoom gear. I had the Nauticam zoom and focus gear ordered just to find out when it arrived that it didnt fit  - so it went back...
Questions to Nauticam support about it have never been answered...Poor...  Seems to be lens not that much used.  Still, I quite like it.

Oh that's weird. I met someone a few weeks ago who was using the lens and had the nauticam zoom gear. Maybe you got a faulty one?

Skickat från min VTR-L29 via Tapatalk

#9 bubffm

bubffm

    Eagle Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 03 January 2018 - 02:15 PM

Oh that's weird. I met someone a few weeks ago who was using the lens and had the nauticam zoom gear. Maybe you got a faulty one?
 

 

 

yes maybe, although my dealer said that would be highly unlikely, they were also labelled as 12-35. Thats why i contacted Nauticam - without success.

 

By now I am happy enough with my plastic kit to keep it.


Edited by bubffm, 03 January 2018 - 02:15 PM.


#10 makar0n

makar0n

    Wolf Eel

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 05 January 2018 - 01:03 PM

Amazing lens, one of my favourites!

Use it most often as a standard lens with 6" dome (+Nauti gear, fits fine)...Great on night dives, especially fluro with some blue lights and yellow 52mm filter - it's quite good at low light.

Also its quite versatile, you can have both zoom and a nice semi-wide angle.

 

Check as Panasonic has released mk.2 of it - maybe Nauti sent you gear for the newer one ?



#11 thetrickster

thetrickster

    Great Hammerhead

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 892 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spain

Posted 06 January 2018 - 12:22 AM

I think apart from going all black and silver in design, the dimensions and ring layout is the same as the MKi so the gearing should all be the same. ?

Optically they are the same with only a couple of operational improvements (Dual IS 2, Freezeproof and stepless aperture while zooming at f2.8)

I loved the lens for little I did use it, as sadly my iPhone for me seems good enough for pictures of the dog etc

I originally got 12-35mm for underwater, as too had saw lots of good stuff with it and the GH3, but the same week I got the 7-14mm and the 12-35mm never got the use it deserved, as I prefer WA it seems. Hence why now I’m shooting the 14-42mm II and the WWL-1 for the 130’ FoV, which probably isn’t as optically ‘nice’ as the 12-35mm.

Look forward to seeing the results Pajjpeb!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Regards, Richard

---

Camera Rig: Nauticam Lumix GH5/GH5s, 14-42mm II, WWL-1, Atomos Inferno, 48,000lm of artificial sun.

www.richardwait.com