Removing scratches from a dome port
#21
Posted 11 September 2006 - 09:20 AM
I buy my own photographic kit. Diving equipment manufacturers and diving services suppliers get even-handed treatment from me whether they choose to advertise in the publications I write for or not. All the equipment I get on loan is returned as soon as it is finished with. Did you know you can now get Diver Mag as an iPad/Android app?
#22
Posted 11 September 2006 - 11:19 AM
Hi John!
Thank you for the info!
I googled "Duraglite" and found it to be the same like "Brasso" what is a wellknown product for polishing kobber and silver in DK!
I know Lars and will check with him for the details and the experience he has! :-)
Best regards and thank you again from Kim!
#23
Posted 11 September 2006 - 03:25 PM
I must say I was suspicious at this suggestion, so I searched round the house for some acrylic to test it out on - rather than my dome port. I selected one of my BSoUP runner up trophies made of some nice flat acrylic and set to work with a lump of wadding out of the tin. The smell of solvent and the tin warnings to keep it off my hands did not feel right.
After washing it off with water things looked very good indeed. If I look very closely at the acrylic I can just see some barely noticable abrasive marks that were not there before. However they were only just noticable under the right light.
I conclude that this suggestion seems quite good. All I need now is to scratch my dome port!
#24
Posted 11 September 2006 - 04:11 PM
I've used the micromesh on a dome. It's worth noting that only the 1st coarsest mesh removes the scratch. The rest of the meshes remove the scratches left by the previous mesh, each mesh only goes so deep.
It's not a sandpaper, it's a fine mesh, the residue you've ground off comes through the mesh without clogging the mesh like normal sandpaper.
I screwed up a few times and had to go back to coarser meshes and start over. I did it in about 30 minutes on an 8" dome, bet I could do it in 20. I'm sure Udo was slowed down by drying and photographing. it's a lot of steps, but it's not a lot of elbow grease, it's not rocket science. The way it goes step by step, many fine steps, it's easy. The 2 step liquids may take more elbow grease to do the same job, I'm not sure.
The final liquid is also an anti-static paste, it helps the dome shed any dust and particles that might be left after the process. I think it helped and was more than toothpaste, just my opinion.
#25
Posted 12 September 2006 - 07:37 AM
There are three liquids in the kit included: A Detergent, an abrassive and an anti static. The abbrasive liquid is probably less rough then toothpaste, which also works fine for cleaning copper and silver (like brasso etc. etc.) I'm sure supercleaner for your car is also something similar. But none of these products will easily remove deep scratches that can be felt with your fingernail.
But anyway, the micromesh acrylic restoral kit works great and i justed wanted to show you people that it's safe to use it. The largest part of this 1.5 hours of polishing was mainly for removing the deep scratch.
I ordered the kit via CIBO in Belgium, their web- or emailaddress is linked on the official micromesh webpage.
cheers, udo
Edited by Udo van Dongen, 12 September 2006 - 09:39 AM.
www.udovandongen.com
Nikon D800, D800E, Hugyfot housing, 15 mm fisheye, 16-35 mm WA, 105mm VR Macro, 60 mm Macro, Subsee +5 an +10 wet diopters, Inon Z-240 strobes (3x), Inon float arms, Nauticam armclamps, Bigblue and Inon focus lights.
#26
Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:17 AM
Actually sometimes you don't need to go through all those different paper grades, though it does make the job much quicker. I would often just clog one of the papers up using a fine oil like baby oil, I found this works better than water!
#27
Posted 14 January 2007 - 03:22 AM
#28
Posted 27 February 2007 - 09:20 PM
Thanks to all of you and Wet Pixel
Bill
#29
Posted 08 May 2007 - 08:26 PM
My second-hand Sea & Sea Compact Dome Port arrived with some light scratches on the inside. Any handy hints for how to best reach these?
#30
Posted 15 May 2007 - 09:59 PM
Flickr: CADiver
Blog: 葉
Nikon D90, Tokina 10-17, Nikkor 60, 105VR, Nexus, Inon Z240 IV, Hartenberger Nano, FixLED 1000DX.
#31
Posted 12 July 2007 - 04:28 PM
Debbie Abrahams
Inside Sales Mgr
Micro-Surface Finishing Products, Inc.
1217 West Third Street
PO Box 70
Wilton IA 52778
Phone: 563-732-3240, ext # 223
Phone: 800-225-3006
Fax: 563-732-3390
Email: debbie_abrahams@micro-surface.com
URL: www.micro-surface.com
Cheers...
Gwangi
#32
Posted 27 August 2007 - 10:59 AM
#33
Posted 06 October 2007 - 08:44 AM
Yes, I have and it's impossible to get close to the edges of the Dome port. I damaged my dome by trying to fit it without the extention ring after changing to a 12-24mm Lens. What happens is that the repair scratch area get larger each time you change the micro mesh. You have your hand half inside the dome and use your fingers to hold the mesh on the foam pad provided with the kit, whilst trying to keep even pressure on the pad. Unfortunately, the pad is flat and against the double inside curve of the port, only the edges of the mesh are in contact with the dome. I also tried to remove the dome from the port backing and failed - ended up buying a replacement port from Aquatica. Unless you can remove the dome from the backing plate your going to have a nightmare of a job. Also another point to consider is, if you only polish a small area you will change the optical properties of the dome and end up with localised distortion when looking through the port. This is a fact I have learnt from polishing aircraft canopies. Good luck.Has anybody tried this on the inside of the dome port? I have an acryllic dome port that has some small circular scratches on teh inside surface due to a zoom ring becoming dislodged during a dive (?!).
#34
Posted 06 October 2007 - 11:11 AM
Has anybody tried this on the inside of the dome port? I have an acryllic dome port that has some small circular scratches on teh inside surface due to a zoom ring becoming dislodged during a dive (?!).
I had the same problem as you and D200digitaldiver (scratches from a zoom ring being dislodged AND scratches from trying a lens that was too big for the port!)
the scratches were not a problem until I started shooting in clear, sunny, shallow water.
so I decided to use the mesh kit on the inside of the dome port. the scratches weren't deep, so I didn't start with the coarsest paper.
I never tried to removing my dome port from the backing. I did not use the foam pad, I used my fingers directly on the micro-mesh strips. It would not have been possible with the foam pad. I spent extra time with each micro mesh in the hard-to-reach areas of the inside of the port. it was hard on my fingers! overall the job seems to be a sucess, my images appear to be fine now. the very outer edges of the inside of the dome port don't look perfect, but I haven't noticed anything in any of my photos.
take you time and I think in the end you will be at least as well off as you were before, probably better off. good luck!
scott
Edited by sgietler, 06 October 2007 - 11:12 AM.
Underwater Photography Guide
#35
Posted 09 April 2008 - 10:30 AM
Any thoughts on how repeated scratch-removal via abrasive polishing might possibly affect the depth integrity of the dome? It would seem that for every micrometer of plastic you remove, the dome would be weaker at depth - even if only by tiny fractions at a time....?
I've been shooting through some real doozies of dings & scratches, due mainly to rough shore entries/exits, and I think it's about time I looked into the solutions noted here.....
cheers
#36
Posted 09 April 2008 - 11:47 AM
Its hard for me to believe that anyone has had a housing fail because a domeport imploded because of pressure. Unless it was shattered against something. There has got to be so much conservatism on the structure of a housing. Housings leak because of seals and controls not structural failure.
Total newbie to diving and UW photography.
Nikon D70: 60 mm, 12-24mm, 105mm, 15mm, 10.5mm, 18-200mm
Ikelite iTTL Housing, dual Ikelite DS125
Canon Digital Elph Canon Housing, S&S 15mm and 2x lenses
#37
Posted 25 April 2008 - 02:08 AM
Edited by RVRinTAS, 25 April 2008 - 02:10 AM.
#38
Posted 07 May 2008 - 02:01 PM
I had the same problem as you and D200digitaldiver (scratches from a zoom ring being dislodged AND scratches from trying a lens that was too big for the port!)
the scratches were not a problem until I started shooting in clear, sunny, shallow water.
so I decided to use the mesh kit on the inside of the dome port. the scratches weren't deep, so I didn't start with the coarsest paper.
I never tried to removing my dome port from the backing. I did not use the foam pad, I used my fingers directly on the micro-mesh strips. It would not have been possible with the foam pad. I spent extra time with each micro mesh in the hard-to-reach areas of the inside of the port. it was hard on my fingers! overall the job seems to be a sucess, my images appear to be fine now. the very outer edges of the inside of the dome port don't look perfect, but I haven't noticed anything in any of my photos.
take you time and I think in the end you will be at least as well off as you were before, probably better off. good luck!
scott
Same deal with using the pad. What I found out is if you work (slowly and meticulously) about 3/4 inch from edge and work it perpindicular to the edge and than do the vertical for the center it came out better. I ended up starting with the 3600 and working to the finest worked for me. At least my wife is happy I'm not spending more money on domes.
#39
Posted 16 May 2008 - 11:41 AM
#40
Posted 17 May 2008 - 01:17 PM
What i don't understand is why the "sand paper method" involves grinding the entire dome
It looks scarry... Wouldn't it be enough to polish the scratched area ?
