Anyone use a "pole-cam"?
#21
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:17 PM
Canon makes a 10m extention but it has to be ordered with quite a bit of waiting time, and I could use this cable in just two days time...
Pole enthusiasts may want to look at this page: http://www.jordansta...s/housings.HTML
or
http://www.aquatech....accessories.htm
made for surfing photography, perhaps you can get some ideas for your own rig there.
Norwegian snapper who prefers warm waters.
#22
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:33 PM
Ack! It's ridiculous to see what Canon charges for their remote. Worst of all, their remote switch (RN-80N3) is nothing more than three pieces of metal that make contact as you depress the button. The remote alternative that's sold for $10-15 on ebay is actually a nice little circuit board with a switch and there's even a sync port on the side for controlling multiple cameras.
Snappy, I do recommend you solder, silicon and shrink wrap the connections. Remember you're dealing with a wet environment and any water that creeps in is likely to cause your camera to go haywire (trust me! LOL).
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
#23
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:41 PM
Norwegian snapper who prefers warm waters.
#24
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:41 PM
#25
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:45 PM
You can use any kind of bulkhead that will fit in that hole. Ikelite is my favorite since it's so robust and you don't have to worry about effing up those tiny little pins living deep inside the Nikonos bulkhead...:-)
If you are really into this, you could even make a 3 pin wet-mate bulkhead connection.
Cheers
James
Dual Ikelite Strobes
Photo site - www.reefpix.org
#26
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:46 PM
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
#27
Posted 18 June 2005 - 12:49 PM
My Seacam has a remote bulkhead in the side, but I haven't investigated cords/connectors yet. At the time I received my Seacam Mk II housing, the bulkheads were NOT standard and had to be specially requested. That may have changed by now -- does anyone know? (Frink?)
#28
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:09 PM
Tom
Thomas C. Kline, Jr., Ph. D.
Oceanography & Limnology
Canon Eos-1Ds MkII and Nikon D1X, D2X, D2H cameras. Lens focal lengths ranging from 8 to 180mm for UW use. Seacam housings and remote control gear. Seacam 150D and 250D, Sea&Sea YS250, and Inon Z220 strobes.
www.flickr.com/photos/tomkline/
#29
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:23 PM
My Seacam has a remote bulkhead in the side, but I haven't investigated cords/connectors yet. At the time I received my Seacam Mk II housing, the bulkheads were NOT standard and had to be specially requested. That may have changed by now -- does anyone know? (Frink?)
I just got a message from Frink Photographic and apparently Seacam is either finished or nearly finished with some parts for the Mark II and D2x housings for pole-camming. Maybe Seacam "Silver" finish on the extension cord to protect it from creature teeth
#30
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:32 PM
#31
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:51 PM
One thing I haven't seen here mentioned (and forgive me if I overlooked it) was getting a little extra piece of mind and insurance against losing a very expensive rig to the sharks.
Secure connections can be made to the housing, but what if something like this grabs your housing? Last year in South Africa, I pulled my housing (with no strobes) from the INSIDE of the mouth of the this 16ft. shark on a couple of occasions. I had a number of teeth marks on the dome port.
Andre and crew were very helpful (based on their experience) and strongly recommended that I tie a very thick nylon rope from the handle of my housing to the boat, in case a white grabbed the housing and all of a sudden I found myself in a tug of war with a 3,000 lbs. fish. You either let go or go into the drink. The rope is the last resort and hope to retrieve whatever is left.
They joked that the sea bottom around Geyser Rock in Gansbaai is littered with expensive camera equipment, and despite numerous offers of $$$ to the crew to retrieve it, it remains there. Whether true or not, it's a valid consideration, especially if you have $$$ invested in the latest and greatest gear.
Regards,
mpo
www.mpostock.com
www.batfishbooks.com
#32
Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:56 PM
#33
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:00 PM
I agree -- I used steel cable that Douglas Seifert happened to bring along to tie my rig to the boat. I've seen sharks chomp far too easily through rope.
Use gloves. The cable I used had little sharp metal bits fringing off of it in various places, and it wasn't pleasant against the skin.
#34
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:05 PM
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
#35
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:16 PM
Good to see you here, too! I suppose some steel fishing leader (sp?) might do the job considering the shark's sharp teeth. I had a nylon line tied to the lanyard metal loop (I wondered what that was for?) on my camera but it was more in case my whole contraption came apart. If the sharks grabbed my housing I'm sure Jimmy would have jumped in and tickled the Tiger until she released it.
Now... What lb. test line rope should we be using in case one of those big leatherback decides to clutch-on and mate with our camera setup?!?! You know once they grab on there's no letting go!
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
#36
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:20 PM
Great to hear from you. I hope all is well. Let me know the next time you guys are in town.
Concerning traveling with the contraption, one of those containers/tubes used to travel with fishing poles would work fine. The tubes, found in any quality tackle store, come in a variety of widths and can be locked.
regards,
mpo
www.mpostock.com
www.batfishbooks.com
#37
Posted 18 June 2005 - 02:44 PM

ULCS Loves Me!
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
#39
Posted 19 June 2005 - 07:03 AM
One question that was asked was about the remote release fitted to the EOS1DSMkII housing. I have this on mine (at least I have currently replaced it with a Nikonos socket for manual flash triggering, but its easily put back), and it consists of an S6 socket wired up through some Canon cabling which connects into the camera's remote socket. Its very nice and neat and I believe that cabling of up to 10m is available for remote triggering.
When I get around to it I intend to do some in-river photography and am looking into a 'tripod' - the best contender being an 'Overexposed Pro Platform' with ball arm sections fitted between it and the housing - unless anyone has any better suggestions.
#40
Posted 19 June 2005 - 04:56 PM
*This is the option for the 20D.. I don't know if its different for the other models
Good joke, Canon!
Soap box: TheLivingSea.com
