Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Getting more than 1:1 macro from 1:1 lenses


  • Please log in to reply
101 replies to this topic

#101 Glasseye Snapper

Glasseye Snapper

    Tiger Shark

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edmonton, Canada
  • Interests:Fish ID & behaviour and photos thereof

Posted 24 October 2013 - 05:42 PM

Just a word of warning against an overly optimistic chase after magnification. Higher magnification only helps if the level of detail in your image is limited by the sensor, eg. pixel size. If the detail is not in the optical image, just increasing magnification is just throwing away field of view and loose depth of field without being able to see any extra detail. The 16Mpix mFT sensor is equivalent to a 64Mpix FF sensor, so pixels are pretty small and you need a very sharp lens to max out the sensor. The 12-50mm lens is a decent lens but there is only so much you can expect from a kit lens and with an aperture of F6.3 at 50mm I expect resolution is limited by the lens and not the sensor.

 

After this depressing message some good news. Diopters and extension tubes can in principle increase the optical resolution of the image (a teleconverter never does) but the biggest gain of the diopter may simply be by shooting through less water. Still my advice would be to get the right tool for the job. The 60mm macro is a very sharp lens, will give you true 1:1 with longer working distance, focus from 10cm to infinity with no need to juggle diopters, and F2.8 to improve focusing and view finder image. Yes, you do loose the ability to shoot wider-angle images on the same dive but to some, me included, that is an advantage. The 12-50mm will remain a great general purpose lens with amazing macro-like abilities build in. And as a bonus, both lenses fit the same port. Pretty sweet.

 

Bart


Olympus OM-D EM5/Nauticam, 12-50mm & 60mm macro
Sea&Sea 110a, iTorch, GoPro3 BE

#102 troporobo

troporobo

    Eagle Ray

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 304 posts

Posted 24 October 2013 - 06:38 PM

Thanks for your thoughts.  Very good points about resolution. I know that the 60 lens would be the way to go for serious macro, and it is on my list.  I am still curious what the working distance would be for the 12-50 with a diopter.