Nikon 105mm or Sigma 105mm
#1
Posted 11 August 2005 - 07:53 AM
Owned a Subal housing for NIKON 801 SLR Camera. Recently just bought dome port for 105 mm lens. Which one would you prefer using the Nikon 105mm macro 1:1 or Sigma 105mm 1:1? What are the pros & cons of the individual lens apart from the price which is obviously the Nikon will cost more than Sigma.
How 'bout using the Vivitar 100mm macro with adaptor ring 1:1?
Please advise accordingly...
Singapore
Diver@68
#2
Posted 11 August 2005 - 12:20 PM
Good luck in making your choice
#3
Posted 11 August 2005 - 03:28 PM
#4
Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:59 AM
I've got both lenses and I truly believe that the Nikon is not worth the extra money over the Sigma.
In my opinion, Sigma's optical quality is as good as Nikon's, if not better. True, Nikon is more solid built, but for underwater use this is not important (always my opinion)...
I've not found any noticeable difference in autofocus speed...
But, you should take in consideration:
-At 1:1 position, Sigma is longer than Nikon
-Sigma is noisier than Nikon (and that can be a problem with skittisk animals)...
Both are very reliable.... And I've also tried the Tamron 90mm and is also very, very good....
Hope it helps
Cheers
Matetes
D70, Hugyfot housing, 2 Inon 220, Sea&Sea YS90,
#5
Posted 12 August 2005 - 06:27 AM
Joe
Author, Catalina Island - All you Need to Know
www.californiaunderwater.com
www.visitingcatalina.com
#6
Posted 12 August 2005 - 05:37 PM
Somebody just offer me Vivitar 100mm macro with 1:1 adaptor.. will it take good pictures as compare with the Nikon or Sigma 105mm?
I'm really lost, please help...
#7
Posted 13 August 2005 - 03:37 AM
Also bear in mind that a Nikon lens will probably cost little more to repair (should it ever need repairing) and will retain its value better than the others. You do not need a 'D' (later) lens for the F801 and you should be able to find an older and cheaper non-'D' AF lens to use quite easily.
#8
Posted 13 August 2005 - 07:44 AM
Joe
Author, Catalina Island - All you Need to Know
www.californiaunderwater.com
www.visitingcatalina.com
#9
Posted 14 August 2005 - 05:21 PM
#10
Posted 22 October 2005 - 06:53 AM
I'm using the 60mm with a Kenko MC7 2x lens (which can be used in the 105 flat port) : it works fine regarding quality and you can take 2:1 pictures which is great. The problem: it slow down the AF.Thanks to all for the vital informations. Another option I'm thinking is to get the Nikon macro 60mm with extension tube - will it works & is it more easy to take underwater?
Claude
#11
Posted 01 November 2005 - 08:32 AM
2 Aquatica f/3 housings
Nikon film f/5's and f/3's cameras
Way to many strobes to list
All that Nikonos junk
and now a subal d300 setup
Still a film divasourus with a baby toe in digital world
