The housing is sold.
- Wetpixel :: Underwater Photography Forums
- Viewing Profile: Posts: ToddB
Community Stats
- Group Member
- Active Posts 39
- Profile Views 1658
- Member Title Triggerfish
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Seattle, WA
Previous Fields
-
Show Country Flag:
United States
-
Camera Model & Brand
D800
-
Camera Housing
Nauticam
Friends
ToddB hasn't added any friends yet.
Latest Visitors
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Nauticam NA-D800 and Sigma 15mm For Sale
07 May 2013 - 11:53 AM
In Topic: S&S YS-250PRO Strobes
28 February 2013 - 10:04 AM
SOLD, thanks.
In Topic: Nikon announces the D7100
24 February 2013 - 10:23 PM
It looks like a decent iteration. It will undoubtedly have a higher quality sensor than the D7000 and the body is a bit more robust. Better video. It feels like Nikon just realized they needed to bump megapixel again but they are still ignoring the high-end DX user in my opinion. Glad they finally added the weather resistant body.
It is *not* a full on replacement for the D300s. It's a shame that Nikon has still left off features I had on my 2007 D300.
- Same stupid left hand dial to let me select "landscape" or "portrait". Really? That's flagship? I'd rather have the old WB/ISO buttons from the D300
- 51 autofocus points? Yes, that's nice, but it's a shame the D7100 is essentially getting the same focus system I had on the D300 6 years ago - shouldn't it be even better?
- Dual SD cards? Compact Flash is still faster. I'm betting the D7100 will still have a small buffer and will stop shooting at the most inopportune time.
- Where's the DX primes? Or anything cool and new in DX lenses?
Please don't misunderstand; this is definitely a better body than the existing D7000 and a very nice evolution. But it also shows me that Nikon wants to move the former D300 user off to FX just like I said in a thread about 3 months ago -- I predicted back then Nikon would never release a D400 but would instead make the next rev of the D7000 it's new top of the line DX.
For an underwater photographer who currently has a D7000, does this make you want to iterate and buy yet another $
2500, (sorry, $3000-$3300) housing for what is essentially a megapixel increase or does this make you want to jump to FX? Is this a good enough iteration to keep people from jumping to Olympus OM-D which is much cheaper and has a better lens selection?
At least Nikon has finally told us the D400 is not to be...
Cheers,
JP
I don't know that the D400 is truly not to be, the below link is mildly encouraging, I can't figure any better reason to limit the buffer as they did than their wanting to provide a compelling point of differentiation with an upcoming pro-dx to squeeze a few more bucks out of folks.
In Topic: uw3some.com | Through The Lens Contest
30 October 2012 - 04:01 PM
Thanks Servane.
Best,
Todd
In Topic: GoPro HD Hero2 Surf + Accessories
29 September 2012 - 10:38 AM
- Wetpixel :: Underwater Photography Forums
- Viewing Profile: Posts: ToddB
- Privacy Policy
