Jump to content

  2. → Viewing Profile: Posts: Borut

Borut

Member Since 16 Mar 2011
Offline Last Active Mar 19 2011 08:49 AM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Sensor size in UW photography

19 March 2011 - 08:45 AM

My experience with the Tokina 10-17 and the little Zen dome have suggested to me that I get better image quality with that combo than if using my large acrylic fisheye port. Lots of variables, but I'm not sure I'd cast off the little domes so quickly.


Hi Steve,

Is your acrylic fisheye port realy 180 deg. and your lens perfectly alighned in it, so that light rays really pass through the glass under the right angle?

Borut

In Topic: Sensor size in UW photography

17 March 2011 - 06:21 AM

Hi Alex,

Thank you for your comments. I am happy to hear that other photographers came to the similar conclusions. If I had two bodies housed (DX + FX) I would almost certainly use them in the similar way as you: DX for macro, tropics and CFWA while FX for wrecks and bad light conditions.

But what about your D7000 which, I was told, has a very good low light capabilities? Is it not good enough to replace your FX body?

Borut

  1. Wetpixel :: Underwater Photography Forums
  2. → Viewing Profile: Posts: Borut
  3. Privacy Policy