Jump to content


Uli Kunkel

Member Since 23 Sep 2011
Offline Last Active May 21 2013 06:49 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: RX100 and the Inon UFL-M150?

11 May 2013 - 05:54 PM

Yep, thats more like what I am after.

I have seen quite a few good shots taken with the S100 and this lens. Even in comparison with the shots you posted in this thread, the image quality is better on the s100 shot. Was there any post processing or cropping done?


In Topic: RX100 and the Inon UFL-M150?

11 May 2013 - 04:01 AM

Thanks for putting up those examples!
Im not too crazy about the image quality though. There looks like quite a bit of blurring on the edges.
I wonder if the result would be the same with the Ike? All of the other housings?

I was in a UWcamera shop in Shanghai (the name Fun-IN) comes to mind- but I could be wrong. Apparently they tested the Nauticam housing with this lens and said the results werent acceptable. Ive never had the chance to see for myself though.


In Topic: RX100 and the Inon UFL-M150?

09 May 2013 - 08:17 PM

Hey thanks for the response and the link

 Im not sure I understand though. Both the Ike and the Nauticam housings have a 67mm threaded port. I have been told before by retailers that the UFL-M150 lens does not work with the Nauticam. If this is the case, why does the Ike work and not the Nauticam? What am I missing?

Im really looking forward to spending more money on an expensive housing.... :D


In Topic: Planet Dive, Anilao

16 January 2013 - 10:23 PM

Awesome!
Fantastic report! Ive been looking at heading to Anilao for a long time. Thanks for sharing.

In Topic: Snoot'ed boxer-crab, same exposure, but not?

17 December 2012 - 09:02 PM

Did you change anything between shots? Strobe position, the cap on the end of the snoot, or the camera orientation to the subject? Could also be that there was some light reflecting off of something (from one of the other holes on the snoot).

It would be interesting to do a few test shots without adjusting anything - when I used that one I noticed that the position of the end cap changed the light distribution quite a bit...