had the D300 and then a Oly OMD5 and now the D500.
For mostly macro, i would take it. Specially for supermacro, simply because of the DOF against any FX.
If you add some plus lenses or even combinate them, your field of raser sharpness will get so small....
If you pm me an email adress, i can send you pics, and you try what you can get out of them.
There will be allways a better, newer camera,
but the question is do we need it???
Or is sometimes the "old"one better for our Goal?
PS: can add you a pic from last weekend in front of a mountain hut.
5 am, lots of stars, a little bit of moon and 15 sec....
- vigfus likes this