Jump to content


adamtaylor

Member Since 30 Aug 2013
Offline Last Active May 18 2018 05:01 PM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Advice... wolf eels and giant octopus

17 May 2018 - 07:04 AM

Do not know the operations in Washington State but hear good things about Rendevous in Barkely Sound on west coast of Vancouver Island, and have greatly enjoyed my outings with Pacific Pro Dive in Campbell River.

 

If you enjoy your first trip and want to head somewhere a little more remote and wild I highly recommend Port Hardy area at the north end of Vancouver Island. It may take you an extra day of travel from the Seattle area but trust me, it is worth it.

 

Google Gods Pocket and you will see what I mean. The owners of the resort are retiring and they will not be accepting new bookings until the new owners get set up. Was there a couple weeks ago and while the underwater life was amazing, seeing multiple whales, dolpins, sea lions etc from the boat kept the short boat rides interesting. As did the rafts of sea otters, and the lone wolf we saw swimming between islands. 

 

Enjoy your hunt for Wolfies and GPO

 

Adam


In Topic: A few videos from a new Wetpixel member

08 April 2018 - 05:45 AM

Hi All! I just joined Wetpixel. My work is basically all film based... I keep trying digital but there's something about the process that's involved with film I can't give up. On top of that, most of my work is motion picture film... 16mm and more recently, 35mm. I process and print my own black and white motion picture film but I send off my colour to labs in Montreal.
 
Anyway, here's a couple of my little films, I hope you enjoy:
 
Dream

 
Reclaiming the Deep: Solving the Riddle of Nitrogen Narcosis

 
Chuuk: Adventure on the Thorfinn (my one digital video!)

 
Cheers!
 
-Jesse-

Nice work Jesse,

Fun to see some Vancouver faces in your films.

I recall the call for participants on Facebook for your Dream video, and am not surprised seeing it was the 'usual suspects' who helped out.

Enjoyed them all.

Regards,


Adam

Sent from my SM-G903W using Tapatalk

In Topic: Lighting the scene

25 January 2018 - 09:17 AM

 
Let's see if a mod can split this thread ;)
 
On WA shots I used to place my light arms more or less at the same height of my camera. Now I try to place them higher than my camera trying to have a light angle coming from above. I like the shadows I get. Of course every reef is different so your mileage may vary.
 
Now I have 4 lights. Two old Keldan Luna 8 CRI (5K lumen each I guess). Two prototypes built by a friend of mine (12K lumen each). I never mounted them together. IMHO I would get a correctly exposed flat image, nothing more.
 
When a keen buddy is available I give him the most powerful set. I fill the subject in front of me with my Keldan and my buddy "flies" 1,5 meters above my head trying to light up the scene/subject from above. Then we play with different angles.
I find that in this way you get amazing shadows. Sometime we get a sense of depth impossible to get in other ways.
Sometime we try a different approach: I light up part of the scene in front of me filming my buddy which in turn light up further far away. Sometimes we get clips we like a lot, sometimes just trash.
 
This video was made from two dives we experimented a lot this technique. I made a lot of mistakes (i.e. I left my lights on while being well far away from the subject getting only a lot of backscatter. The Gerardia Savaglia was completely burnt on the highlights cause I haven't zebra on my GH3) nevertheless you can see several examples of what I'm trying to explain. 
 

 
The amphora at 1:12 and 1:24 is light up from my lights and from my buddy above. The same scene at 1:30 is light up only by me and as you can see it's not simply a matter of exposure. The clip at 1:12 has a completely different depth of field.
 
We used the same "tricks" on most of the clips of this video:
 

 
You can see what you can get on a big sponge light up from the opposite at 2:13.
Again the small gerardia savaglia from 2:40 is light up from above even in the close up clip.
At 3:22 you can see my buddy moving upwards while I film the small dendrophyllia and you can see how the reef appears under this kind of light.
At 4:29 an example of me lighting up part of the scene in front of me while my buddy, in turn, lights up further far away. We gently move together giving a great "sense of depth" IMHO.
 
I understand that I have very particular tastes for UW imaging. I do not pretend to be mainstream and sometime I'm very contentious here ;)
Once you have several lights and some collaborative buddy you can be very creative.
 
In conclusion... we never get bored underwater.
 
Bye

Following with interest as this lighting technique is what we are experimenting with on glass sponge reefs.

My local waters are often dark & murky near the surface, and clear up somewhat at depth. There are a handful of reefs just within recreation diving limits, but even at +/- 100 feet it is often like twilight down there.

There are larger, and even darker reefs in the 250-300 foot range but I leave those for a technical dive team depth and when lucky a submersible.

Filming another diver lighting up the reef with no lights on camera has reduced backscatter and created a dark, moody scene where the diver is basically a bubble of light travelling through and alien landscape.

3200 ISO gets grainy and 6400 looks terrible. Any suggestions for cleaning up noise appreciated as I am new to video editing.

As was suggested in this thread positioning the camera with lights to illuminate foreground, while dive buddy with second set of lights adds depth additional illumination swimming the reef in the background.

My dream shot is to have multiple divers turn on lights in sequence creating pools of light illuminating the reef off into the distance.

Unfortunately given live boat deployment and site conditions it is difficult to get more than 2-3 divers down in the excact same place.

Will try to upload some sample video later tonight

Regards,


Adam

Sent from my SM-G903W using Tapatalk

In Topic: IS IT WORTH IT? GH5s - No Stabilization

09 January 2018 - 09:31 AM

I agree with almost everything everyone is saying.
 
The lack of IBIS is a major bummer for me, wasn't expecting them to remove that. But it seems its not due to the sensor size or aspect - it seems the target audience for this camera where screaming for the removal of IBIS, as it was ruining in-car, on-gimbal shots - so Panasonic listened.
 
Pajjen raised a valid point for deep / dark ambient shooting where a clean high ISO would be really useful and where lights wouldn't reach.
 
If the visibility is right, I really enjoy videoing wreck exteriors, where even super powerful lights wouldn't reach, so potentially having a super high iso - and clean would be cool.
 
Will find out when the body arrives.

I am also looking forward to any deep & dark dive footage. Deep wreck exteriors would be similar low-light conditions to what I am trying to shoot, and I find the GH5 sorely lacking.

Off-camera lighting helps (filming a diver from a distance) but the dark areas have terrible grain at higher ISO

Still on the fence regarding GH5s


Regards,



Adam

Sent from my SM-G903W using Tapatalk

In Topic: GH5S Rumours...

08 January 2018 - 11:34 AM

Here it is
https://www.huffingt...4b0cd114bdb350a

It has 4k 60p only at 8bit and no IBIS. Makes it (not such) a tough call whether its worth the upgrade.

I was cautiously optimistic that this camera would be a good replacement / companion to my GH5 for use filming deep, dark glass sponge reefs....

Would love to see some real-world footage showing low-light performance.

-Adam

Sent from my SM-G903W using Tapatalk