Jump to content


divengolf

Member Since 26 Jun 2006
Offline Last Active Aug 23 2017 07:42 AM
*****

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Aquatica housing screw holes

17 August 2017 - 05:38 PM

Are we sure that the threads are SAE and not metric? I have a D7000 Aquatica housing that packed away or I would check.


In Topic: Pet peeve of the Ikelite Strobes

07 July 2017 - 06:04 AM

Agree with jaja. Have had several Ike strobes. Never had a problem. Just don't force anything. The connections align easily and slide in to be tightened.

But I've gone to S&S due to weight mostly and non-propriety batteries.


In Topic: improved zoom ring for tokina 10-17mm (nikon mount) on Nauticam housing?

22 June 2017 - 03:36 PM

Tim,

 

Here's a couple pics of the zoom ring. My lens is packed for a trip to Africa, so the ring is removed. This will give you an idea of what I did.

 

Harry

 


In Topic: improved zoom ring for tokina 10-17mm (nikon mount) on Nauticam housing?

22 June 2017 - 03:36 AM

Had a similar problem years ago with an Aquatica zoom ring and a Tokina 10-17 lens where the zoom ring did not fit tight enough to prevent slippage UW. I installed three small set screws 120 degrees apart on the zoom ring. I positioned them to contact the zoom ring in such a way that they met the lens rubber zoom adjustment at a solid part of the lens. It was some years ago, but I believe they were 6-32 with an allen head. I bought a 6-32 tap and handle, about $10 back then. The biggest trick is to make sure that you drill the holes for the tap the proper size. Also pick the length of the set screws so they are flush with the outer portion of the zoom ring when tightened. And make sure that the set screws are positioned such that they do not interfere with the housing gear as the ring rotates.

 

I have since installed set screws on all of my zoom rings and have not had any slippage problems since.

 

Hope this helps.


In Topic: What do do when cameras can't fly in the aircraft cabin

12 May 2017 - 05:13 AM

For years, I have used a bag in a bag approach to checked luggage containing valuable items, i.e., housings, strobes, etc. I pack a sturdy, reinforced carry-on size bag inside a non-descript, well -worn duffle bag, so it doesn't scream "valuable items inside" as a Pelican does. I use my tee shirts, swim trunks, etc. as padding. Never had a problem as it seldom gets looked at by TSA.

 

But I have never packed cameras or lenses in this manner. Those are always in my carry-on. If this new policy becomes more widely implemented, going to have to give this some thought.

 

One question: Do we know yet if the current policy from the Middle East includes lenses? My reading of the restrictions is unclear.

 

Also time to review my insurance policy for such items. BTW if you're eligible for USAA insurance, they have an All-Risk personal property policy that has zero deductible. And it's very affordable. I had a mechanical failure on a D70 housing years ago and they paid the claim promptly with few questions.