Wetpixel Printable Content :: Digital Underwater Photography and Videography

Wetpixel Printable Content, courtesy of Wetpixel.com. All content © Wetpixel.com and content authors.
This article may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without explicit consent from Wetpixel.com.

Join our community at Wetpixel! [back to Wetpixel.com] [close window]

Are 25 new digital SLRs really necessary?

And, should there be housings for each?

Posted: 06 February 2008 12:55 AM
Last Update: 06 February 2008 01:11 AM
Categories: News,  Photo News
Author: Matt Segal ( segal3 )
Related Link: 25 new DSLRs (and housings?)

After Digital Photography Review’s Phil Askey mentioned the introduction of a possible 25 digital SLRs at this year’s PMA 2008, Wetpixel associate editor Alex Mustard started a discussion asking if it is really necessary for housing manufacturers to attempt to support each and every new model of camera. Alex says:

While I love my Subal housings, I would be the first to admit that my Subal D2X does not have the attention to detail of a Subal F5 housing. It was also a damn sight more expensive. Of course it works and the ergonomics are perfectly acceptable, but I miss those good ol’ days!...Maybe if we did not demand a housing for every DSLR we would have cheaper, better housings.

Do you think the rush to produce the first housings (and small amounts at that) for a camera is leading to a loss in quality and support? Should manufacturers only focus on the most popular cameras of each pricing level? Discuss in the forums

[Back to Wetpixel.com] [Close Window]