If you’ve been shooting with a digital camera for any period of time and been online then you’ve probably heard the rave reviews about the Magic Filter developed by Dr. Alex Mustard and Peter Rowlands. This is a filter that goes on (or behind) the lens and is used to filter out “undesirable” light, allowing more vibrant color to reach the camera’s sensor, and ultimately to be recorded. The magic filter builds on principles that were thoroughly explained in an article here on Wetpixel by Craig Jones back in 2003 called “Filters and Ambient Light Photography.” Craig took the concept a step further when he started experimenting with complementary filters, going beyond ambient light photography. To simply explain: a filter is used on the camera lens to reject undesirable ambient light and a complementary filter is used on the strobe, to allow foreground lighting to be used but to appear natural. For example, if you take a photo in a dark room using the complementary filter set, the shot will appear “normal.”
Background:
When I booked a trip to Little Cayman, I reasoned that I would be shooting mostly wide-angle photos and it would be a perfect time to test the filters. Craig recommended one of the easiest filters to use – a CC30m (for magenta). This filter blocks cyan from entering the lens and is weak enough that it can be used in shallow water without making everything appear too magenta. It’s also easy to pick a complementary filter for this one because it is not a mix of colors – a CC30g (for green) is the perfect complement. This combination will knock down your total exposure by about one stop, so be prepared to use a smaller f-stop and more strobe power. I ordered a 77mm CC30m screw on Hoya filter from B&H and some Optiflex CC30g resin filters which are about 1mm think. These can be cut with a hobby knife, but are pretty fragile, so be careful not to crack them. They are a special order item and took about 10 days to arrive. I cut them into round units to fit under the diffusers I made (milk jug material) for my Ikelite DS200 strobes.
Here is an example of what the end product looks like. This photo was taken in about 40 feet of water with excellent visibility.
The following photos are for comparison purposes. Because my wife and I have similar camera set-ups I was able to do what hasn’t been done before – capture an identical scene, under the same sunlight conditions using a “standard” unfiltered wide-angle setup, and a filtered wide-angle setup.
For each shot the white balance was set at 5000K with +10 tint using ACR. Exposure was brought up by 1 ½ stops for the first photo so that the exposure values (in camera at least) will be the same.
Observations:
Clearly there is more cyan in the first photo. This can be corrected in post processing by changing the white balance value; however this can have a “red-graininess” effect and can also result in purple water. The second photo shows much bluer water, but not much color in the foreground. This is due to a number of factors. Firstly, the Caribbean reefs just aren’t that colorful to begin with. Secondly, as a general rule, when using a filter on the lens, it’s best to shoot with the sun behind you, so that it shines down on the subject. However, if you follow this rule, you can’t get a sun-ball into the picture! The important observation (at least to me) for photo number 2 is that the water shows a very pleasing blue, even at 5,000Kelvin.
The third photo says it all. It shows a pleasing blue background and a foreground with colors that really pop. In this example, you can also see that the surface of the water is not “blown out” and does not look magenta. That indicates that the CC30m filter was a good choice.
Discussion:
A byproduct of using the filter on the lens is that it blocks cyan light in photos with a “sun-ball” in the frame. One of the common critiques of digital underwater capture is that the sensor does not render the sun very well. This is because unlike film, the digital sensor has a linear response to light. The direct sun quickly saturates the sensor with blue and green light, basically “filling up” the pixels before red and the other warm colors can be recorded. A filter on the lens which removes some cyan light basically lets you get the same blue water exposure that would result in a blown-out sun, but instead, the green/blue ring around the sun is removed. The following photo is an example – shot directly into the sun at noon in 50’ deep water.
Conclusion:
Complementary filter photography at first sounds pretty complicated, but it’s really easy to get started and it won’t “screw up” your photos. After trying it one just one trip, I am completely hooked. It may take some experimentation to discover the correct complements for all of the red/orange/magenta filters out there, but I’m hoping this article will spur people into putting in some thought and time to experiment for the benefit of the underwater photo community. If you’re interested in trying something different that might just bring your wide-angle photos up a notch then I highly recommend complimentary filter photography.
-James Wiseman
I get my Filter at the theater lighting supply, just check the Rosco web site for the one closest to you, these sheet are made to be installed in front of floodlight and are pretty resilient and best of all, VERY CHEAP to buy, ten bucks will supply you average dive club.
They come in Various CC (color correcting)grade’s including standard 80B, 85B green, magenta..
I’ve been using that magenta/green for some time now and its a blast for Ice diving also
Great article, James. Thanks to you and Craig for bringing it too us. Another Wetpixel classic in the making. I am really looking forward to having a go at this. I think that the lack of turquiosey cyans near the surface in the sponge shot and around the sun in the sunburst shot is very convincing.
My concern with adding too much magenta to UW images is not with the beneficial effect on the cyans, but the problems it causes with background blues. Have a look at your deeper blues away from the sunburst (in the corners of the frame). Magenta rich blues look OK on the screen, but they cause a big problem in CMYK printing (e.g. in magazines) where they can very easily look too purpley.
This tends not to be a problem for on screen viewing or home or photo printing from RGB files, but it is any art ed at a scuba mag will tell you this is a common problem even with straight shots when printing in CMYK.
Alex
The other aspect you didn’t comment on is that the M filter on the lens darkens the water (as this filter attenuates blues more than warmer colours) relative to the foreground, which often creates more dramatic pictures. Alex
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the comments. This is meant to be a really non-technical article so I don’t know if it has the backbone to make it to classic status but I appreciate the kudos :-)
I forgot to mention in the article that for folks wishing to see the rest of the WA photos from this trip check out:
http://www.reefpix.org/gallery2/v/underwater/Little+Cayman+HUPS+Trip/james/wide/
All shots taken w/ the Tokina 17mm were filtered. The 15mm FE shots were not.
Alex, I DID notice in the prints I made that one of them suffers from the “purple water” effect. It’s this one:
http://www.reefpix.org/gallery2/v/underwater/Little+Cayman+HUPS+Trip/james/wide/VC9H1762-cayman.jpg.html
The other print I made looks great though:
http://www.reefpix.org/gallery2/v/underwater/Little+Cayman+HUPS+Trip/james/wide/VC9H1320-cayman.jpg.html
I used the paper/printer profile and “Proofed Colors” in Photoshop before I sent them off to be printed. But you can see just looking at the screen that the first shot has more magenta in the water. Good point you made and will probably save people some headaches (and $$$) when printing.
Cheers
James
I used a cc20 red filter and cyan strobe. How did you decide on the cc30?
Alex, I agree with the comments about water becoming so blue that it tends toward purple. Little Cayman has especially clear water and it’s an example where maybe less filter strength is prudent. My diving has always involved greener water than the sapphire blue there.
Viz’art, Rosco’s website is great. They offer a lot of filter choices and publish spectral responses of all their filters. They’re also inexpensive but they’re made for lighting, not lenses. I’ve ordered some samples and will do some testing to see if they’re useful for lens filters. I hope so because I’m really optimistic over the pink ones! Should be better than magenta because it blocks less yellow. If you use Rosco filters on lenses I’d love to hear your opinions on them.
I do use the Rosco ND gels for strobe testing. I have a translucent “screen” that I layer with the Rosco ND gels. I fire a strobe straight into it and take a perfect picture of the strobe pattern. Works great! It’s underwater safe as well but I haven’t progressed to doing pool tests with it.
Hoovermd, a red/cyan combo is of interest to me but i’ve not tried it personally. I think the 20 versus 30 is just an arbitrary choice. When I first used the technique I was fighting sunbursts with a D100 which has only ISO 200 and 1/180 strobe sync. I needed to slow my camera down so choosing a stronger filter was obvious. The difference between 20 and 30 is only 1/3 stop though. I think the strength is a matter of where you dive. Little Cayman may be better with 20 than 30.
It is also worth noting that if blues have a bit too much magenta this could always be toned down very easily with “Selective Color”, without the need for masking, in Photoshop. But I only see this being a problem for CMYK printing and I would not expect it to be problematic for prints, projection or on screen viewing.
Alex
Thanks Alex - Do you just bring down the magenta slider in “Selective Colors?” That sounds like a good fix.
Thanks
James
Hi Alex, i am new to the this site, but was also curious why you decided to use the green/magenta combination, when the more cyan color, the more obvious choice might be cyan strobes and red filter. Just curious; but your results are definitely impressive....phil