Wetpixel Printable Content, courtesy of Wetpixel.com. All content © Wetpixel.com and content authors.
This article may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without explicit consent from Wetpixel.com.

Join our community at Wetpixel! [back to Wetpixel.com] [close window]

Posted: 21 July 2005 11:45 AM
Last Update: 30 November 2007 04:50 AM
8 comment(s)

8 Comment(s):

1. What bodies do these support? I’m getting ready to put my Pentax 67 on ebay. Hopefully they will be cheaper than my D2x since all it is is a back :~) !!

   Posted by onbelaydave  on  07/21  at  08:13 PM

2. Hi Dave,

   These digital backs are designed for use with medium format cameras.

   Cheers
   James

   Posted by James Wiseman  on  07/22  at  08:46 AM

3. And you thought diving with digital 35 mm format cameras was expensive. There used to be a Hasselblad housing (why would you dive with 12 frames of 6x6) available, unless you have lots of dive sherpas and really lots of money, I am not sure the bigger negatives make enough sense.
   BVA

   Posted by bvanant  on  07/22  at  04:14 PM

4. I think Aquatica may still make medium format housings.  Who wants to try one? :-)

   Cheers
   James

   Posted by James Wiseman  on  07/25  at  11:14 AM

5. As someone who has a MF Hasselblad - that is still in use - I would say that MF is not well suited to UW shooting because of lack of DOF. Also these backs cost big bucks - and are not well suited to flooding! Alex

   Posted by Dr. Alex Mustard  on  07/26  at  02:42 AM

6. I don’t believe most of us have $20,000+ for a digital back.  I thought Carl Rosseler used medium format for his coffee table books and one of the guys I have talked with at Sub Aquatic Camera repair still uses a Rolleimarine housing. Eventually as the price comes down I believe there will be a niche market for underwater digital medium format where extreme detail is desired. Pentax used to make a housing for its 6X7. I wish that digital backs were made for the Pentax 6X7 or 67 but they are not.  I have seen a four lens Pentax system go for $2000.  Folks are dumping their medium format gear to buy high megapixel DSLRs.  Pentax is making a 645 digital body that will use the old lenses.  Their medium format systems were always extremely competitive from a price and feature stand point.  Hopefully they will have afforadbly priced medium format digital cameras. For me the idea of having a large view finder on a housed medium format camera to compose through is appealing.  My first camera was a Mamiya 120 rangefinder that I made contact prints from when I was nine years old.  I still have it.  All the best.
   Andy

   Posted by 2Oceans  on  07/26  at  02:15 PM

7. I have been using the mamiya RZ67 Pro II system on land and underwater with the Aquatica RZ67 Housing.
   The prisms viewfinder is simply exquisite (large and bright) especially with a Beattie Screen on.
   The 220 back offers 20 frames and the ProWinderII allows for a 1 FPS shoot speed. 20 frames is a little more convenience than 10, yet less than the new digitlas.
   I am waiting for prices to come down in a self contained HR digital back for the housing camera package.
   The RzPRo II with an adequate digital back will fit the current housing with little modificationthe. The housing, which is no longer in production is occassionally found on e-bay.

   Depth of field is less, yes but at f22 for what I do it is very nice....it is a hoot to shoot this rig!!

   Mauricio Handler

   Posted by handlerphoto  on  07/29  at  12:25 PM

8. While I was in Undersea II at Brooks Insitute of photography, Ernie Brooks taught me that 1/125 at f8 is what he has been shooting with his hasselblad with a ziess port for over 30 years.  Lucky I got my hands on the same camera setup 12 years ago. I shoot mostly the same way and get tack sharpe results edge to edge. The ziess port with the diopter makes the difference (focused at 2 meters).  I see the port on ebay every few years, even recently. Although, I don’t think it had the matching diopter. I plan on renting a digital back for the SWC to test it before I buy.
   I would only use the digital back for my advertising clients who would need to see the shot on set. Any Oceanscapes I would still shoot film as long as it is around.

   Ric

   Posted by Ric Frazier  on  11/30  at  06:50 AM

[Back to Wetpixel.com] [Close Window]